IM dyno comparo: VICS vs VTCS vs Flat-top (EUDM)

VTCS mani was de-butterflied.
VICS mani switchover was 5400 RPM
Tested on 2.0L n/a stroker motor by FM.
Last edited by JasonC SBB; Dec 13, 2011 at 09:17 PM.
IM resonance effects are not affected by absolute pressure. So with boost, should be about the same.
Affected more with temperature. Higher temperatures and pulses and sound move slower. So with high IATs, maybe the resonance effects are moved to a lower RPM.
Affected more with temperature. Higher temperatures and pulses and sound move slower. So with high IATs, maybe the resonance effects are moved to a lower RPM.
Yes operational, at 5400 RPM. I find 5600 RPM the "correct" point when RPMs are slowly rising. If RPMs are rising rapidly a lower switch point is better.
Last edited by JasonC SBB; Dec 14, 2011 at 12:08 AM.
180whp with a stroker for 10k? Isn't emilio making 170whp with the non North American motors, slight head work, rb header, and tune. I could replicate Emilio's motors for 3k or so...
I understand this, but I still want to see it
Gutted in this context means reaming out the entire Helmholtz chamber and everything else into a giant plenium. Just removing VICS butterflys would make the manifold worse IMO. VTCS is another story - removing those butterflys is a no brainer.
--Ian







