Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

My NA 1.8 NA made 110/102. Input?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:00 PM
  #61  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
that's a bit pricey for a dynojet.
They got me by the ballzzzzz. My only other option is to pack it up and take it to AZ and have it professionally tuned, which I realize is my best option but money is tight (7mo old baby and a stay at home mom, I'm the income) and this is essentially just a toy car to me. I was hoping to put that off until next year.

There is a Mustang dyno in El Paso but the owner genuinely and deeply dislikes me... I'll look into it anyways.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:24 PM
  #62  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

You can't street drive this car? A bunch of tuning (especially fuel) can be done on the street.

Also, it is important that there be a way to circulate coolant in the block while the car is warming up. That's what the permanently open side-route through the Miata heater core is for. If you're planning to do a reroute with only the Kia waterneck, what are your plans for this? No thermostat? Enlarged hole in thermostat? Never thought about it?
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:33 PM
  #63  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
You can't street drive this car? A bunch of tuning (especially fuel) can be done on the street.

Also, it is important that there be a way to circulate coolant in the block while the car is warming up. That's what the permanently open side-route through the Miata heater core is for. If you're planning to do a reroute with only the Kia waterneck, what are your plans for this? No thermostat? Enlarged hole in thermostat? Never thought about it?
I can and do street drive it and that's where we've done a majority of the VE tuning but for WOT pulls I'd much prefer to be stationary and not breaking any laws.

Never thought (knew) about that layout. I purchased this car as a 95% complete SM that I have since just turned into a lapping toy, it never had a heater core and the only coolant setup this thing has ever had is the stock upper setup and an altered lower which consists of only the rad hose, nothing else on the housing, IIRCC... I'll snap some pics this evening...
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:34 PM
  #64  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,716
Total Cats: 364
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

After reading "some" of this thread, I get the impression that you have a 99 head on a 97 or earlier block. This would drop your compression quite a bit less than either stock 97 or 99 setup. Great for a turbo.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:35 PM
  #65  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

This thread has gone from "Why is my WHP low?" to "Why is my car such a basket-case?"
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:47 PM
  #66  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Therein lies the problem with buying someone elses modified car. When you start from stock, you can compare your setup to tens of thousands of other stock '94s. When you start from a previously modified car, you have nothing to compare to.

Good luck getting all this stuff sorted out.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:51 PM
  #67  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy
After reading "some" of this thread, I get the impression that you have a 99 head on a 97 or earlier block. This would drop your compression quite a bit less than either stock 97 or 99 setup. Great for a turbo.
Shiiiiiit, I'm trying to figure out how to make my simple NA setup function properly, I don't need to get all crazy with turbos and boosts and positive manifold pressure.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:58 PM
  #68  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

I lied. We altered the cooling system. We drink a lot when we work on this thing. Like, a lot.



Attached Thumbnails My NA 1.8 NA made 110/102. Input?-fca88eb4.jpg  
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:07 PM
  #69  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

You are going to seriously cook your rear cylinders running you coolant system out of balance like that. Search for "Miata coolant flow" or something like that to see a picture of how coolant flows through the engine. Pretty sure Joe Perez has posted a clip out of the OEM FSM that shows it.

Given that you've blocked off the rear coolant outlet from the head, I'd say that a proper reroute needs to be moved way up in priority.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:10 PM
  #70  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,192
Total Cats: 1,398
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Wow. Stop touching Miatas.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:10 PM
  #71  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
You are going to seriously cook your rear cylinders running you coolant system out of balance like that. Search for "Miata coolant flow" or something like that to see a picture of how coolant flows through the engine. Pretty sure Joe Perez has posted a clip out of the OEM FSM that shows it.

Given that you've blocked off the rear coolant outlet from the head, I'd say that a proper reroute needs to be moved way up in priority.
It's been like this since April of '12.

Yeah, I'll fix it right. :(
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:11 PM
  #72  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Wow. Stop touching Miatas.
No dude.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:16 PM
  #73  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Stock
It's been like this since April of '12.
Fortunately, by running pig rich, having low compression due to using 94-97 pistons with a 99 head and running at high elevations, you're not making any power (hence the thread). Might have saved you. LOL.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:17 PM
  #74  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

he wants you to stop touching miatas, so you can start touching him.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:20 PM
  #75  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
Fortunately, by running pig rich, having low compression due to using 94-97 pistons with a 99 head and running at high elevations, you're not making any power (hence the thread). Might have saved you. LOL.
God works in mysterious ways. Praise be to him.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 02:20 PM
  #76  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
he wants you to stop touching miatas, so you can start touching him.
I'm not saying no but I haven't said yes.
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 12:21 AM
  #77  
Stock's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 797
Total Cats: 219
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Hello.

So we had our annual night event on 7/16 and I made had some changes. Adjusted the MAT correction table per Brain's example, worked on my BARO correction table, trying to zero it out even thought it looked like it already should have been and got my CLT sensor seeing actual honest to God values. Obviously, this threw my VE table for a loop...

Ari and I did a few laps while he did some adjusting, looking for 12.5:1 - 13:1 to redline. Got it dialed in and the car felt good, not like a "holy ****, that's incredible!" but it just felt better. I made the comment that it still kinda felt like it was "choking", like it had more in it and we both agreed that that was probably the timing.

So we did some logs and that was that. I turned laps for about 6 hours and drove it home. When I looked at the logs I was surprised to see that it was showing 10.5 - 12:1 by redline so I thought about the AEM calibration thread I saw a while back and went ahead so I went ahead and followed the modification shown here and it seems like the laptop and gauge matched up for the short time I let it idle today. I'll take it to work tomorrow afternoon and see if it really helped.

I'll attach the last log so you guys can tell me I'm a moron.
Attached Files
File Type: msl
2014-07-19_17.11.58.msl (231.5 KB, 113 views)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
Oct 26, 2018 11:00 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
Apr 21, 2016 03:00 PM
JxPhan
Meet and Greet
3
Oct 2, 2015 02:17 AM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
Sep 30, 2015 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.