Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2014, 09:02 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 648
Total Cats: 216
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
So Pinky...

Results?
I went ITB's, the Mazda manifolds are sitting on a shelf in my shop.
Pinky is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 09:07 PM
  #42  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

I've got some dyno time coming in the next month, Pinky, with my new Miata build. I also have a stock, unmodified 99 IM, and would not mind doing back to back pulls, and it will be built for 8500rpm, giving further data on the mod through a larger rev range.

Seriously. PM me if you want to try to get something worked out - I'd like to see this happen.

Last edited by blaen99; 03-16-2014 at 11:15 PM.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 02:27 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default

Here's what I did. I'm not limited by rpm control.

https://www.miataturbo.net/general-m...linkage-59754/

Before and after.


And then eliminated the hump.
Attached Thumbnails Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.-p1000691_zpsa85ec23e.jpg   Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.-p1000693_zps3c7cbc9b.jpg   Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.-p1020112_zps57c916e1.jpg  
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 02:35 AM
  #44  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

...and? back to back pulls?

Not that I'm considering this. I just have been doing some searching about putting an MSM engine into a '99 and happened upon this thread. Seems like an interesting question.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 10:34 AM
  #45  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I keep saying this: gutting makes no sense.


someone please just make it so the damn VICS makes a longer/shorter runner and test that.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 11:04 AM
  #46  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 856
Default

Pinky should get Mani to Blaen99 for the A/B testing and complete this science project. Interesting thread resurrection.
DNMakinson is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 01:01 PM
  #47  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,893
Total Cats: 399
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I keep saying this: gutting makes no sense.


someone please just make it so the damn VICS makes a longer/shorter runner and test that.
Yes damnit. Please.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 01:06 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default

[QUOTE=turbofan;1112247]...and? back to back pulls?

I'd have to go back and look, but I made an extra 14 ponies by eliminating the hump.

Originally Posted by Braineack
I keep saying this: gutting makes no sense.
someone please just make it so the damn VICS makes a longer/shorter runner and test that.
For me, it made sense to try to increase the plenum volume under boost and still keep the longer runner length for velocity during non boosting driving.
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 01:22 PM
  #49  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

You also gutted part of the IM, which likely negatively impacted you based on similar dynos, unless you have before and after plots.

PM'd Pinky myself. Let's get this test done Pinky.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 02:47 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
You also gutted part of the IM, which likely negatively impacted you based on similar dynos, unless you have before and after plots.

PM'd Pinky myself. Let's get this test done Pinky.
No, I gutted a lot of the intake manifold. I don't see how increasing the plenum volume an a FI engine is a bad thing. When your not driving in boost wouldn't it be beneficial to try to keep something resembling stock runner length? I realize we are putting lipstick on a pig of a manifold/tb, but I don't think that going Honda is any better than what I've done. There is a mind numbing amount of information on plenum sizing/runner length for FI engines out there. I gave up for now cause I'm happy with how the manifold works. It was cheap. This year I'd kinda like to enjoy driving it instead of figuring out the manifold that will control the universe.


So why doesn't someone come up with a grant fund we can contribute to for this kinda stuff. Submit your proposal, that's based on time of completion, etc. just sayin........
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 02:55 PM
  #51  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

gutted manifolds have already been proven not to do jack ****.

what no one has dynoed yet is using the VICS as a short/long runner rpm controlled manifold so you get the best of both worlds.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 02:59 PM
  #52  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

I've set up a deal with Pinky.

It's happening. Expect dynos within a month from today at the latest OR BAN*, you hear Brainy?

*: Assuming Pinky gets the IM to me in a reasonable amount of time.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 04:03 PM
  #53  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

I won't even ban
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 04:03 PM
  #54  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Bro, do you even admin?
Leafy is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 10:47 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default

Cool. I would like to help. I have this top that is already shaped and polished.
Let me know where to send it.


Attached Thumbnails Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.-p1020119_zps472f3eb2.jpg   Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.-p1020118_zps5ab0f832.jpg  
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 11:25 PM
  #56  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

You know what?

If anyone else wants a particular IM tested in a back to back situation, PM me.

Sending you a PM now, 2many.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 03-17-2014, 11:44 PM
  #57  
Newb
 
canyonarrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 2
Default

Hmmmm....I wonder if 18PSI shipped me his squaretop yet. That could be interesting to throw into the mix.

Either way, I won't be installing it anytime soon. Think we should add it?
canyonarrow is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 12:00 AM
  #58  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

yes I did. sent you tracking too
18psi is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 12:06 AM
  #59  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by canyonarrow
Hmmmm....I wonder if 18PSI shipped me his squaretop yet. That could be interesting to throw into the mix.

Either way, I won't be installing it anytime soon. Think we should add it?
Sounds good to me.

It'll be interesting to get data on the squaretop up to 8500 as well.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 02:05 AM
  #60  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

I had virtual dyno runs with the manifold gutted. Showed a nasty hole between 5-6.5k rpm but it showed a nice bump just at redline few horses above the vics dyno. That said it does help however not in our stock 7k redline.

Jeff i know we talked about my idea of shortening the main runners and leaving the vics chamber in tact few weeks before the local dyno event. Did you ever mess around with that further or no?

Gotta get the hole on my manifold welded and give it a shot some day.
triple88a is offline  


Quick Reply: Upper VICS Mod for turbo cars.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.