Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

The AI-generated cat pictures thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 07:28 AM
  #43581  
rwyatt365's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,459
Total Cats: 132
From: ATL
Default

Those look like welds that I would do!!
Originally Posted by Braineack






Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 10:05 AM
  #43582  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,794
Total Cats: 1,342
From: Rochester, NY
Default


Old Nov 24, 2021 | 06:08 PM
  #43583  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Gee Emm
Nah, the approach was RS. You fly these things on at a constant rate of decent until the wheels hit, that E2 was all over the shop. There may have been reasons to be desperate to get on board, but otherwise that approach would have resulted in at least one unpleasant interview, and a spell of practicing approaches. He did a great job to keep it out of the water though!

https://youtu.be/lUT7v90eCU0 shows an E2 landing, note the relatively stable view out the front of the aircraft on finals until the wheels hit.
Sorry I'm late to this party.., the E-2's approach was fine (not perfect, but fine) and had nothing to do with the wire parting. This was a fleet CQ (carrier qualification) event with a veteran crew and if I remember correctly, the LSO grade was "not enough power in close and flat in the wires, "FAIR-4"... it was fine. If there was anything an LSO would really critique, it was dropping the nose (flat) in the wires... this causes not only the nose to drop, but the tail (tailhook) to rise, and the tailhook missing the ideal "3-wire" and grabbing the "4-wire" instead. Still, the pass was fine, no unpleasant interview required.

The wire parted due to a combination computer and mechanical malfunction in the arresting gear engine itself.

The co-pilot of that E-2 is a former squadron-mate of mine and a great American. I had the fortune to interview him regarding the incident shortly after the event when I was the E-2 Community Rep at the Naval Safety Center... he said that the instant the wire parted, he was absolutely confident that they still had enough speed to fly it away. Not kidding... he said that he knew before they went off the edge again that he knew they were going to be fine.

You can give a lot of credit to the constant-speed prop system that instantly provides 10,200 of Pratt & Whitney's finest horsepowers on demand. That, and being light-loaded on fuel for CQ, was moving just over 40k/lbs... its a metric ****-ton of power for a propeller plane... roughly twice the power to weight of a P-51 Mustang if that helps.
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 06:59 PM
  #43584  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
You can give a lot of credit to the constant-speed prop system that instantly provides 10,200 of Pratt & Whitney's finest horsepowers on demand.
That is one of those technologies which, as an engineer, I recognize was not at all obvious until someone thought of it.

"This engine is only efficient at this one very specific and narrow range of RPM."

"Well, let's design things such that it always operates at exactly that RPM."


And I respect that.
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 09:29 PM
  #43585  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

So, this one hit me pretty hard:



Despite being in Nigeria, I can vouch for the fact that this is a legit post, not a scam.

This is from a FB group for broadcast engineers. We have a large number of members from Africa / southern & eastern Asia, who are doing really heroic work to keep radio & TV on the air in their communities. These are places where internet access is not taken for granted.

[edit]
My snark may not have come across earlier. To be clear: these are places where electricity, clean water, and a non-warlord government are not taken for granted.
[/edit]

The specific box which he's offering is a fairly common SDI to analog converter. It costs $295 new, and I literally have a pile of them on the shelf in my spare-parts room, along with other piles of similar devices. In my world, they're as consumable as toilet paper. I just order them in bulk every time I notice (or one of my engineers informs me) that we're running low of a commonly-used model.

But to this guy, it's a unique thing which he no longer has a specific need for, and yet it has residual value which merits him taking the time to try and find a new home for it, with the hope that it will bring him some money in return.

That sort of thing gives me pause.

Last edited by Joe Perez; Nov 24, 2021 at 10:09 PM.
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 10:01 PM
  #43586  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
But to this guy, it's a unique thing which he no longer has a specific need for, and yet it has residual value which merits him taking the time to try and find a new home for it, with the hope that it will bring him some money in return.

That sort of thing gives me pause.
You know the old adage, one man's trash an all. This guy is 100% going to make someone's day with this device, kinda like how I'm currently interested in laying hands on a BIPES ACU.
To some, these devices are archaic trash or "common as toilet paper" but to others, they can be incredibly useful. Even if just for the sake of wanting to try it out for ones own edification.



Last edited by EO2K; Nov 24, 2021 at 10:13 PM.
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 10:53 PM
  #43587  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,603
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
Sorry I'm late to this party..,
No problem glad you made it. I was hoping someone a little closer to the scene would drop in.

the E-2's approach was fine (not perfect, but fine) and had nothing to do with the wire parting. This was a fleet CQ (carrier qualification) event with a veteran crew and if I remember correctly, the LSO grade was "not enough power in close and flat in the wires, "FAIR-4"... it was fine. If there was anything an LSO would really critique, it was dropping the nose (flat) in the wires... this causes not only the nose to drop, but the tail (tailhook) to rise, and the tailhook missing the ideal "3-wire" and grabbing the "4-wire" instead. Still, the pass was fine, no unpleasant interview required.
That was my point, I may have overcooked it a bit in the light of your comments.

The wire parted due to a combination computer and mechanical malfunction in the arresting gear engine itself.
I never questioned or disputed that.

The co-pilot of that E-2 is a former squadron-mate of mine and a great American. I had the fortune to interview him regarding the incident shortly after the event when I was the E-2 Community Rep at the Naval Safety Center... he said that the instant the wire parted, he was absolutely confident that they still had enough speed to fly it away. Not kidding... he said that he knew before they went off the edge again that he knew they were going to be fine.
This surprises me - they went down a long way and stayed quite a while before reappearing, seemed to me to be a brown underpants event. Certainly would have been for me if I was riding in the jump seat.

You can give a lot of credit to the constant-speed prop system that instantly provides 10,200 of Pratt & Whitney's finest horsepowers on demand. That, and being light-loaded on fuel for CQ, was moving just over 40k/lbs... its a metric ****-ton of power for a propeller plane... roughly twice the power to weight of a P-51 Mustang if that helps.
That makes the co-pilot's comments more understandable.
Old Nov 24, 2021 | 10:57 PM
  #43588  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Old Nov 24, 2021 | 11:07 PM
  #43589  
Gee Emm's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,603
Total Cats: 248
From: Canberra, sort of
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
That is one of those technologies which, as an engineer, I recognize was not at all obvious until someone thought of it.

"This engine is only efficient at this one very specific and narrow range of RPM."

"Well, let's design things such that it always operates at exactly that RPM."


And I respect that.
Constant speed props have been around since WW2. Dunno about the mega HP engines, there may have been difficulties associated with the sheer amount of grunt to be transmitted.

However, efficiency is not the be all and end all - 'effectiveness' may happen at a higher rev number, and while greater power will come at a lower efficiency, that can be a worthwhile trade - like when going off the end of a carrier deck while trying to get the bird up to flying speed, or taking off hot and high at MTOW.. That's why they have a prop speed lever, and a power lever (or used to, probably a digital engine control unit in the mix somewhere these days).
Old Nov 25, 2021 | 09:20 AM
  #43590  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Gee Emm
Constant speed props have been around since WW2.
Yes, I am aware of this.

As I said, it's one of those things that nobody thought of, until one day, someone did. And then everyone was like "of course!"

Anyway, this is the pictures thread.









Old Nov 25, 2021 | 01:32 PM
  #43591  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Old Nov 25, 2021 | 05:49 PM
  #43592  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

For @Braineack, whose true name cannot be pronounced by native speakers of English:

Old Nov 26, 2021 | 10:09 AM
  #43593  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

https://www.facebook.com/groups/2808901859324201/posts/2973841996163519/
Old Nov 26, 2021 | 11:27 AM
  #43594  
chiefmg's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
Total Cats: 1,157
Default


Old Nov 26, 2021 | 12:16 PM
  #43595  
good2go's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,815
Total Cats: 1,237
Default


Old Nov 26, 2021 | 03:46 PM
  #43596  
chiefmg's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
Total Cats: 1,157
Default


Old Nov 26, 2021 | 04:31 PM
  #43597  
poormxdad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,375
Total Cats: 163
Default

Originally Posted by good2go
OMG. OMG. OMG. B-52 Radar Navigator chiming in. That made my year!
Old Nov 26, 2021 | 04:37 PM
  #43598  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

I thought the B-52 was supposed to be retired by 2175?
Old Nov 26, 2021 | 04:45 PM
  #43599  
good2go's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,815
Total Cats: 1,237
Default

Originally Posted by poormxdad
OMG. OMG. OMG. B-52 Radar Navigator chiming in. That made my year!
What a beast it is! I'm continually amazed that the platform is still so viable. I read that they expect to utilize them through 2050 (i.e. approx 100 years of service!!)


Another favorite oldie of mine, the DHC-2 Beaver:



Last edited by good2go; Nov 26, 2021 at 04:59 PM.
Old Nov 26, 2021 | 06:51 PM
  #43600  
DeerHunter's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,061
Total Cats: 2,325
From: Canada
Default

Beaver will never fall out of fashion




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.