
06032008, 02:23 AM

#1

Boost Pope
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago (Over two miles from Wrigley Field. Fuck the Cubs. Fuck them in their smarmy goathole.)
Posts: 26,317
Total Cats: 1,914

Is there a statistician in the house?
I need some help visualizing this.
Assume that two fair coins are tossed. For each toss, there is a 25% chance that both will be heads, a 50% chance of one heads one tails, and a 25% chance that both will be tails.
Now assume that, outside of your sight, I toss both coins and reveal to you that they are not both tails. What is the probability of one heads and one tails? Is it still 50%, or does the elimination of one of the possible outcomes make it 66.6% heads/tails and 33.3% both heads?



06032008, 02:26 AM

#2

Elite Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,614
Total Cats: 2

Helping the kids with homework or something??



06032008, 04:00 AM

#3

Trackspeed Engineering
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 937
Total Cats: 10

I say the 2nd, 66.7% and 33.3%.
Usually 4 possible outcomes.
coin 1, coin 2
H, H
H, T
T, H
T, T
Thats how you get the 25/50/25.... eliminate the double tails and you have...
H, H
H, T
T, H
1 of the 3 (33.3%) times it is two heads.
2 of the 3 (66.7%) times it is one heads and one tails.



06032008, 04:13 AM

#4

Supporting Vendor
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 14,362
Total Cats: 1,323

If it were 50% odds of one heads/one tails, it would have to be equal odds to have the opposite (one tails/one heads), and that leaves no room for the heads/heads possibility. It's 66/33.



06032008, 09:57 AM

#5

Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,198
Total Cats: 1

This isn't a stats question, it is a probability question. Case one considers the case of unconditional probability, whereas case two considers conditional probability.
This is the same concept that is applied to justify prooftesting.



06032008, 11:07 AM

#6

Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,730
Total Cats: 2

If I cant see it, how do I know you flipped it?



06032008, 02:16 PM

#7

Boost Pope
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago (Over two miles from Wrigley Field. Fuck the Cubs. Fuck them in their smarmy goathole.)
Posts: 26,317
Total Cats: 1,914

Agreed on pretty much everything that's been posted, except I'm not quite so certain of the outcome.
Before I toss the coins, each of the four possible outcomes (HH, HT, TH, TT) has a 25% chance of occurring. In fact, even after I toss the coins, the odds are the same. The question becomes after I look at the coins and reveal to you that they are not TT, do the odds change?
Bear in mind that if we did this enough times, in one out of every four tosses I'd have produced TT, and thus the remainder of the experiment could not have taken place. Or put another way, the fact that I am able to ask you the question on three out of four executions (having not tossed TT) seems to validate the fact that the 25% TT probability did exist, thus maintaining the balance of probabilities.
To me, it's almost a Schroedinger problem. Do the odds change simply because I look at the coins and describe the result? I'm sure that there is a solid, concrete answer, I just don't know what it is.



06032008, 02:22 PM

#8

2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,038
Total Cats: 407

joe I refuse to answer the question until you make a video demonstrating the procedure. Please include at minimum 30 coin tosses that are not tailstails results and a spreadsheet showing the occurrences of the remaining outcomes.
ok i'll answer a little: if you have four possible states (HT, TH, TT, HH) and the chances are each 25% out of a possible 100% of tosses, removing one state makes the total possible chances 75%. hence overall you are still 1 in 4 but for the subset it becomes 25%/75% or 33.333%. For HT/TH you get 66.667% chance.



06032008, 02:22 PM

#9

Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 172
Total Cats: 0

I see what your saying, you know its impossible for it to be TT, so there is only 3 possible outcomes it could still be. Right?



06032008, 02:39 PM

#10

2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,038
Total Cats: 407

right.. you synthetically turn a 1 in 4 into a 1 in 3.



06032008, 02:53 PM

#11

Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 172
Total Cats: 0

Basically I guess what your doing is saying its impossible to get TT or the universe will end because its the laws of physics.
SO the only possible outcomes are H H, H T and T H



06032008, 02:56 PM

#12

Supporting Vendor
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 14,362
Total Cats: 1,323

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Before I toss the coins, each of the four possible outcomes (HH, HT, TH, TT) has a 25% chance of occurring. In fact, even after I toss the coins, the odds are the same. The question becomes after I look at the coins and reveal to you that they are not TT, do the odds change?

It's not a 25% chance of TT occurring, it's a 0% chance for this particular experiment, because you told me it most definitely is NOT TT. Since HT and TH must have equal chances, that makes up for 2/3s, and HH makes up the other third.



06032008, 03:15 PM

#13

Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,730
Total Cats: 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
To me, it's almost a Schroedinger problem. Do the odds change simply because I look at the coins and describe the result? I'm sure that there is a solid, concrete answer, I just don't know what it is.

HA HA.
I actually wrote "Schroedinger called, he said whats up". Then I edited it out. :(



06032008, 03:39 PM

#14

Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,198
Total Cats: 1

I guess I wasn't explicit enough in post #5. The first case is an experiment of unconditional probability, the second being conditional probability. P[xx=HH]=0.5 (probability of headsheads is 0.5)regardless of the experiment, however P[xx=HHxx TT]=0.33 (probability of headsheads given that the result is NOT tailstails). The conditional probability is a subset of the total probability. Chapter 1 of any probability textbook; "Law of Total Probability."



06032008, 03:51 PM

#15

Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: High Point NC
Posts: 4,854
Total Cats: 8

50/50 chance, didn't read thread, sorry if answered



06032008, 03:56 PM

#16

Elite Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,868
Total Cats: 66

Are we taking wind speed/direction, air temp. , humidity and altitude into consideration? Don't forget you'll need to also use a 20% correction factor.
So if we were to flip these coins at let's say, 6,000 ft with an air temp. of 55* and 30% humidity and no wind, then i'd have to say there is a 100% chance that you'll get a result and that those results will be disputeable because not everyone is going to agree with your correction factor.
But since you're asking the question after clearly omitting one of the probabilities, then you must use a correction factor of 33% and 66%.



06032008, 04:10 PM

#17

Boost Pope
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago (Over two miles from Wrigley Field. Fuck the Cubs. Fuck them in their smarmy goathole.)
Posts: 26,317
Total Cats: 1,914

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savington
It's not a 25% chance of TT occurring, it's a 0% chance for this particular experiment, because you told me it most definitely is NOT TT. Since HT and TH must have equal chances, that makes up for 2/3s, and HH makes up the other third.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta93LE
I guess I wasn't explicit enough in post #5. The first case is an experiment of unconditional probability, the second being conditional probability. P[xx=HH]=0.5 (probability of headsheads is 0.5)regardless of the experiment, however P[xx=HHxx TT]=0.33 (probability of headsheads given that the result is NOT tailstails). The conditional probability is a subset of the total probability. Chapter 1 of any probability textbook; "Law of Total Probability."

Yes, I think you've nailed it. The one coin toss in question is not any toss, but a member of the subset of tosses where the outcome is not TT. For that subset of tosses, the probability of of HT/TH is not the same as for the entire set including TT.



06032008, 04:21 PM

#18

Boost Czar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,854
Total Cats: 1,788

nerds...just take the money and run.



Thread Tools 
Search this Thread 


Posting Rules

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off




