MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

Idle VE Table Values?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2018, 08:41 PM
  #21  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Is this the basemap from DIY? I would think that would be pretty baked out.

Have you tested the fuel pressure?
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:45 PM
  #22  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Oh and incorporate AFR is not the same as EGO
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:49 PM
  #23  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

you have alpha-n enabled for your secondary fuel load with 100ve values accross the board
then you have it multiplying ve1 vs ve2
18psi is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:49 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Going through the circuit, R33 and R18 are reading open... (active flyback clamp circuit?) Would this cause any issues?
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:50 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
you have alpha-n enabled for your secondary fuel load with 100ve values accross the board

lol

then you have it multiplying ve1 vs ve2
Yeah.... I wanted to have it engaged but not doing anything so I could tweek it later if I was ready for that level of complexity.
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:53 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Oh and incorporate AFR is not the same as EGO
Okay. Noted. So incorporate AFR allows AFR target to help adjust along with VE? EGO changes whatever is necessary to match the target?
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 08:54 PM
  #27  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Is this the basemap from DIY? I would think that would be pretty baked out.

Have you tested the fuel pressure?
Yes, base map from DIY
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:00 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Im going to try and find a write up for how to test the active flyback clamp circuit parts. If anyone has a link they know of, that would be awesome, but Ill try to piece it together from the hardware manual.
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:11 PM
  #29  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

If you have an oscope, you can look at the injector low-side turn off. If it rings up and doesn't clamp, then the clamp isn't working. MS2 had a different clamp voltage than MS3, much lower I believe.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:19 PM
  #30  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
If you have an oscope, you can look at the injector low-side turn off. If it rings up and doesn't clamp, then the clamp isn't working. MS2 had a different clamp voltage than MS3, much lower I believe.
Yeah... havent invested in a scope yet. All my money went to the car... Is there a way to test it with a multimeter and an adjustable voltage source?

To ensure Im not chasing ghosts, this active flyback circuit is important for high-z injectors as well as low-z, right? Mine are 15ohm. I know the PWM flyback damping circuit isnt needed.
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:32 PM
  #31  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Flyback is for any low side switched inductance. It prevents the switch from being overvoltaged. The injector acrually closes faster without it, or if the flyback voltage is pretty big (like the 36V in the MS3).
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:36 PM
  #32  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Flyback is for any low side switched inductance. It prevents the switch from being overvoltaged. The injector acrually closes faster without it, or if the flyback voltage is pretty big (like the 36V in the MS3).
So what you're saying is that I dont need it? Or that it should be deleted?
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:38 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ted75zcar
Is this the basemap from DIY? I would think that would be pretty baked out.

Have you tested the fuel pressure?
I have not tested the fuel pressure. I hear the pump prime and the car was running super rich, so I wasnt thinking supply would be an issue.... IIRC not all cars run the same pressure.... is there a setting in MS to compensate for supply pressure? If I go grab a rental feul pressure gauge from Autozone, what should I be reading as "good"?
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 09:40 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Should I just say "screw it" and run my stock ECU until my sequential injector card comes from JBPerf? I am fine with that, but just worried ill be wasting time sitting on my hands and still have this problem then too...

I'm coming up on 15 hours of troubleshooting and I'm gonna lose my mind.
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 10:40 PM
  #35  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Originally Posted by JaveStack
So what you're saying is that I dont need it? Or that it should be deleted?
no, without it you blow up the injector drivers
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 10:42 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

According to some other forum posts and adaptronic educational material, my setup for semi-sequential is not optimal. Tomorrow Im going to switch to untimed injection, reset my VE table, and start over. I will let you guys know how it goes. Thanks for all the help thus far.
JaveStack is offline  
Old 06-20-2018, 10:55 PM
  #37  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Originally Posted by JaveStack
I have not tested the fuel pressure. I hear the pump prime and the car was running super rich, so I wasnt thinking supply would be an issue.... IIRC not all cars run the same pressure.... is there a setting in MS to compensate for supply pressure? If I go grab a rental feul pressure gauge from Autozone, what should I be reading as "good"?
~43.5 psi with the pump on and the engine off.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:15 AM
  #38  
Tweaking Enginerd
iTrader: (2)
 
Ted75zcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,778
Total Cats: 359
Default

Honestly man, it is unlikely to be fuel pressure. You PW is like1.6ms when it should be more like 3 or so with a req fuel of 12.1, VE of 50%, load of 30kpa, 100% fuel correction. For sequential, you need 4 separate drivers. If your HW only has 2 batch drivers, then you are probably getting way more squirts than you think.
Ted75zcar is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 08:14 AM
  #39  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,501
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by JaveStack
Can anyone tell me the proper injection timing values for running semi-sequential? I switched to batch and now it is super lean... leads me to believe this may be the problem.
look at my basemap.

According to some other forum posts and adaptronic educational material, my setup for semi-sequential is not optimal. Tomorrow Im going to switch to untimed injection, reset my VE table, and start over. I will let you guys know how it goes. Thanks for all the help thus far.
semi-seq > untimed.

dont listen to aussies.
Braineack is offline  
Old 06-21-2018, 09:04 AM
  #40  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JaveStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
look at my basemap.
Where might I find the most recent version of this fabled document? You have about a gazillion posts on here and I don't want to mix up an old post as "correct" like I have in the recent past...
JaveStack is offline  


Quick Reply: Idle VE Table Values?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM.