Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Morpheus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 12:14 AM
  #141  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

GTA just posted the gallery that Amanda Gift from Snaps Studio shot @ SLB.
So cool!!!










Link to full gallery - http://s1293.photobucket.com/user/GlobalTimeAttack/library/2016%20GTA%20Super%20Lap%20Battle/SNAPS%20Studio%20Amanda%20Gift%20Harvie?sort=2&pag e=1

Last edited by Blackbird; Nov 16, 2016 at 12:24 AM.
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 02:26 PM
  #142  
stefanst's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
From: Lambertville, NJ
Default

500cc V8: Memorable Motorcycle: 1957 Moto Guzzi V8 Photos - Motorcycle USA
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 03:54 PM
  #143  
ridethecliche's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 146
From: New Fucking Jersey
Default

I can't wait to see how you stack up once you build up that engine.

I remember reading Savington calling some of the rotrex'ed cars deceptively fast because you could just get on them earlier. Looks like it translates.
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 04:20 PM
  #144  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche
I can't wait to see how you stack up once you build up that engine.
Me neither.
I have all kinds of horrible ideas in the last few days..
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 04:49 PM
  #145  
BMWidmer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 12
From: LI, NY
Default

I thought you were doing a honda powerplant?
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 05:15 PM
  #146  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

The plan for Creampuff is a turbo K24.
Morpheus was never meant to have more than a supermiata S2 level engine, which on E85 and a high power tune would make what, 160-ish?
But nothing is set in concrete, I have a few ideas that I've been playing with, so it might be that Morpheus will be getting a different engine..
Old Nov 16, 2016 | 11:59 PM
  #147  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Many more pics posted tonight, courtesy of MCV Imagery
Still need to weed though the full gallery, but this one is pretty cool, right on time for wheels up Wednesday!

Old Nov 17, 2016 | 09:04 AM
  #148  
BMWidmer's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 110
Total Cats: 12
From: LI, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
The plan for Creampuff is a turbo K24.
Morpheus was never meant to have more than a supermiata S2 level engine, which on E85 and a high power tune would make what, 160-ish?
But nothing is set in concrete, I have a few ideas that I've been playing with, so it might be that Morpheus will be getting a different engine..
My bad, its easy to confuse the two projects. Will you implement the same aero on creampuff that is on Morpheus?
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 10:40 AM
  #149  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Yeah, I can see how they are easily confused
To answer your question, some pieces will be carried over (like the DRS wing), but the plan also involves going even further down the rabbit hole with venturi tunnels etc..
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 11:06 AM
  #150  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

My best effort @ Super Lap Battle, uploaded in 1080HD.
Excuse the rusty driving, been on the sidelines for 2 years and I'm not yet up to speed.. driving as smooth as a lumberjack
Car has a 1:58.xx in it, will report as times come down, enjoy!

Old Nov 17, 2016 | 12:58 PM
  #151  
dcamp2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 818
Total Cats: 69
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by ridethecliche

I remember reading Savington calling some of the rotrex'ed cars deceptively fast because you could just get on them earlier. Looks like it translates.

My rotrex car was that way. SUPER predictable/smooth power. Obviously a turbo car could make more power, but Rotrex is very easy to drive.
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 02:14 PM
  #152  
d k's Avatar
d k
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Total Cats: 3
From: Portland
Default

I wouldnt say a SC car is easier to drive.

As a matter of fact, I would say turbo cars are easier.



When you have a traction event in a supercharged car, you all of a sudden have way more boost than you were originally anticipating.

Ask me how I know
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 04:58 PM
  #153  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,622
Total Cats: 2,619
Default

Originally Posted by d k
I wouldnt say a SC car is easier to drive.

As a matter of fact, I would say turbo cars are easier.



When you have a traction event in a supercharged car, you all of a sudden have way more boost than you were originally anticipating.

Ask me how I know
Disagree. SC car much easier to drive than turbo. Having boost not solely related to rpm but also related to time and load adds a 3D map that the driver has to adjust too. In a straight line it's easy with a turbo. Pull trigger, wait, go fast. The issue is when adjusting line on corner entry and mid corner when there is a bit of lag and no TPS based boost control. It requires a different, and slightly less precise driving style because the driver can never, be 100% in control of torque unless it is at WOT and the time factor has stabilized (driver waited for boost). The SC, OTOH, is just a N/A motor with some help. Easy peasy.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 05:09 PM
  #154  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

All this makes twin-charging sound very appealing
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 05:10 PM
  #155  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Disagree. SC car much easier to drive than turbo. Having boost not solely related to rpm but also related to time and load adds a 3D map that the driver has to adjust too. In a straight line it's easy with a turbo. Pull trigger, wait, go fast. The issue is when adjusting line on corner entry and mid corner when there is a bit of lag and no TPS based boost control. It requires a different, and slightly less precise driving style because the driver can never, be 100% in control of torque unless it is at WOT and the time factor has stabilized (driver waited for boost). The SC, OTOH, is just a N/A motor with some help. Easy peasy.
A lot of ECU's can give you this feature.

I understand its not what you were getting at (an analog driver controlled TPS based boost control), but it gets you closer than nothing
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 06:12 PM
  #156  
d k's Avatar
d k
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Total Cats: 3
From: Portland
Default

To each their own I guess...

There are certainly benefits on both sides. SC is definitely more responsive, but I feel that a turbo is more forgiving.

Having driven both, in my limited experience, I feel that a turbo is easier to drive overall.


Originally Posted by emilio700
Disagree. SC car much easier to drive than turbo. Having boost not solely related to rpm but also related to time and load adds a 3D map that the driver has to adjust too. In a straight line it's easy with a turbo. Pull trigger, wait, go fast. The issue is when adjusting line on corner entry and mid corner when there is a bit of lag and no TPS based boost control. It requires a different, and slightly less precise driving style because the driver can never, be 100% in control of torque unless it is at WOT and the time factor has stabilized (driver waited for boost). The SC, OTOH, is just a N/A motor with some help. Easy peasy.
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 06:32 PM
  #157  
Scaxx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,654
Total Cats: 887
From: Seattle, WA
Default

*cough* N/A ftw *cough*
Old Nov 17, 2016 | 06:32 PM
  #158  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Leaving the turbo vs. SC topic behind, MCV Imagery kicks butt!













Old Nov 17, 2016 | 06:39 PM
  #159  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

Even more awesome photos from MCV!













Old Nov 17, 2016 | 07:33 PM
  #160  
Blackbird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 842
Total Cats: 415
From: Northridge, CA
Default

I just can't get over how well the 3D mapping of the upper body work turned out.
It took a lot of time to map in 3 dimensions every dot of space in the span between the hood and the trunk so that we'll be able to smooth out the fairings.
It worked out so well that the body is as flat as a pancake, and I'm not even entirely done with it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.