Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Everyone Needs Some Boost In Their Life

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2016 | 12:18 AM
  #81  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

well, it's running, right?
so it did it's job. the rest of 99% tuning will still need to be done.
All we're saying is you guys are putting way too much faith in these "base maps". Some people start and drive immediately, but that's not true across the board. its still an untuned full standalone
Old May 31, 2016 | 07:17 AM
  #82  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Did either of you verify your spark timing with a timing light yet? I'm betting not.

Some cars run better than others on a base map because some are closer to the condition of the car the base map originated from. All require tuning. I worry about the ones where the base map runs "well enough" right away because the noob owners never bother to tune it completely. Time bomb.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:00 AM
  #83  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
well, it's running, right?
so it did it's job. the rest of 99% tuning will still need to be done.
All we're saying is you guys are putting way too much faith in these "base maps". Some people start and drive immediately, but that's not true across the board. its still an untuned full standalone
I mean... it coughs to life for a half second like a dying smoker, so if you consider that "running" then sure.

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Did either of you verify your spark timing with a timing light yet? I'm betting not.
Doesn't the car kinda have to be running for more then 2 seconds to verify that? Or does checking it with the stock ECU count? Its never been advanced/retarded from the stock 10 degrees.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:03 AM
  #84  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I give up. Good luck
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:05 AM
  #85  
Wingman703's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 600
Total Cats: 648
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

My bad. That might have come off harsher then intended.

I'll need all the luck I can get though, so thanks.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:07 AM
  #86  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Did either of you verify your spark timing with a timing light yet? I'm betting not.

Some cars run better than others on a base map because some are closer to the condition of the car the base map originated from. All require tuning. I worry about the ones where the base map runs "well enough" right away because the noob owners never bother to tune it completely. Time bomb.
Fairnuff. Checked my timing before starting, it was close enough. Got it started and then used the angle offset or whatever that is called to make it match when set to static timing.

I was just expecting a bit closer than <10:1 afr (max my guage will read). If it were 11-12 or 16-17 I would just assume the tune was off. Being as rich as it was I was thinking it may have been a setting I missed somewhere.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:14 AM
  #87  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by x_25
Fairnuff. Checked my timing before starting, it was close enough. Got it started and then used the angle offset or whatever that is called to make it match when set to static timing.

I was just expecting a bit closer than <10:1 afr (max my guage will read). If it were 11-12 or 16-17 I would just assume the tune was off. Being as rich as it was I was thinking it may have been a setting I missed somewhere.
Until the car hits 160 degrees you have a few things that could cause it to be rich. First is your warmup enrichments may be to high, so it is running rich, the second is the idle cells in the VE table are probably a bit to rich.

You can either change all the warm up enrichments to 100 across the board and let it warm up to above 160 and then work on tuning the idle cells. Or you can leave WUE alone and just pull some fuel out of the idle cells until you get it to a somewhat reasonable range for an idling AFR. Once you give above 160 you will probably have to mess with it again. Save the original tune off somewhere and then don't feel bad about playing around with fuel a bunch to get it closer to what you want.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:14 AM
  #88  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Wingman703
My bad. That might have come off harsher then intended.

I'll need all the luck I can get though, so thanks.
ok I'll be nice and give it one more shot:

if your car is dying and blowing smoke, its likely super rich. in which case hightlight a large group of VE table cells around idle area and start lowering them until you can maintain an idle that's not pouring fuel through the exhaust.

then sync timing per the instructions.

then start actually setting up your car, like doing idle test and setting idle valve stuff, tuning fuel, spark, warmup, startup, and the gajillion other things.

hope that helps

PS: you gotta actually put effort into it though. it's a steep learning curve, but it's not impossible. you can't just throw up your hands in the air when a base map doesn't run the car like OEM and "ask for help" when you're not even sure what's actually wrong or what you're even asking for.

that's like saying "hey doc, something hurts, can you tell me what disease I have?"
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:18 AM
  #89  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Until the car hits 160 degrees you have a few things that could cause it to be rich. First is your warmup enrichments may be to high, so it is running rich, the second is the idle cells in the VE table are probably a bit to rich.

You can either change all the warm up enrichments to 100 across the board and let it warm up to above 160 and then work on tuning the idle cells. Or you can leave WUE alone and just pull some fuel out of the idle cells until you get it to a somewhat reasonable range for an idling AFR. Once you give above 160 you will probably have to mess with it again. Save the original tune off somewhere and then don't feel bad about playing around with fuel a bunch to get it closer to what you want.
I got it up to about 150f or so. WUE was down to 106% so it is just really far off. I will be playing with it when I get time over the next few days and will try scaling the idle cells a bit.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:35 AM
  #90  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by x_25
I got it up to about 150f or so. WUE was down to 106% so it is just really far off. I will be playing with it when I get time over the next few days and will try scaling the idle cells a bit.
I would drop all the cells around the idle kpa/rpm by increments of 5 until it gets up into the high 13 range. Don't worry about getting a perfect 14.7afr idle right now. Anywhere in the 13.5-14.0afr range will be good enough to drive the car around, keep it running, and let you work on getting everything else worked on.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:39 AM
  #91  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
I would drop all the cells around the idle kpa/rpm by increments of 5 until it gets up into the high 13 range. Don't worry about getting a perfect 14.7afr idle right now. Anywhere in the 13.5-14.0afr range will be good enough to drive the car around, keep it running, and let you work on getting everything else worked on.
That was the plan, although I was gonna take the ratio of 13.5/10 and just multiply the cells by that.
Old May 31, 2016 | 11:45 AM
  #92  
sonofthehill's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,199
Total Cats: 591
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Not sure if you guys are running flow force injectors or not but if you are here is a bone.
My stock 99 motor cranks around approximately 4ms pulsewidth cold and idles around 1.9 to 2.4ms depending on temperature. I don't need much WUE compared to my stock injectors.
Look at a log of your pulsewidth when trying to start.

Also I agree with what these guys are saying.
Old May 31, 2016 | 10:18 PM
  #93  
x_25's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,822
Total Cats: 144
From: NorthWest NJ
Default

Fixed mine. Take a look at your injector dead time settings. Mine looked good at first glance, but there was a setting jacking it up to 6ms from what I thought was set to 1.2ms....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ThePass
Race Prep
35
Mar 18, 2018 04:15 AM
jt@namiata.com
Engine Performance
4
Feb 8, 2014 08:32 PM
kman456
DIY Turbo Discussion
38
Dec 19, 2013 08:57 PM
chris850
General Miata Chat
23
Mar 5, 2011 06:42 PM
UI Vandal
General Miata Chat
7
May 7, 2010 09:20 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 PM.