Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Garrett vs EFR at DIYAutotune discussion

Old Jun 17, 2014 | 12:23 PM
  #41  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Chiburbian
Maybe mods split this out? I feel like I want to ask more questions but I will only be cluttering up the BEGI thread.


It's my thread, do what you want. Post cats, dicks, spew obscenities everywhere, i don't care in the slightest.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 01:01 PM
  #42  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
335/325 out of a GT2560R @ 19 psi? you're smoking crack. That's like 70 more ftlbs than the max i've seen.

******* cool as hell though.
Your comments make me LOL. I was wondering why my nitrous bottle was empty. It's a BP-Z3 is installed in a Lotus7 replica. Packaging is much better, exhaust is MUCH better. Motor is well prepped, not stock.

Originally Posted by concealer404
Right. My 2554 holds up top better than that. And better than the 2560 on that chart.

Those torque numbers don't gel either. Smells like FM's dyno.


Ben, are you sure those numbers aren't like.... those turbos on an F2T?
How do the torque numbers "not gel"? You know that horsepower is derived from torque and RPM, right?

There's no level of impropriety in the plots; I don't sell turbos or have an agenda. If you feel like an EFR is a good choice for you, go for it. In this test, the EFR lost power, both on the actual and butt dynos. The car's owner is registered on this forum and he'll post up if he feels like it.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 01:07 PM
  #43  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Theres just no way, no matter how good your exhaust is, that you can make a 32lb/min turbo make 325whp on a heart breaker dyno, especially not with a BP. And that you can fail to beat that with a much more efficient 53lb/min turbo is just mind boggling.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 01:12 PM
  #44  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Your comments make me LOL. I was wondering why my nitrous bottle was empty. It's a BP-Z3 is installed in a Lotus7 replica. Packaging is much better, exhaust is MUCH better. Motor is well prepped, not stock.

How do the torque numbers "not gel"? You know that horsepower is derived from torque and RPM, right?

There's no level of impropriety in the plots; I don't sell turbos or have an agenda. If you feel like an EFR is a good choice for you, go for it. In this test, the EFR lost power, both on the actual and butt dynos. The car's owner is registered on this forum and he'll post up if he feels like it.


I know how horsepower is derived, i'm just saying that the torque number you got out of the 2560 is pretty much unpossibru, and it's weird that it falls so hard. I can't understanding losing almost 100wtq from peak to redline on a built BP with any EFR.

I actually remember you posting a similar 2560 making 325whp in a Locost/Lotus/Caterham thing awhile back... this the same car?
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #45  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Packaging is much better, exhaust is MUCH better.
Can you get permission to post pics of the manifold and exhaust? I want to see what better and MUCH better looks like.

I bailed on a GT2560R in favor of an EFR6258 specifically because of the limitations we've traditionally seen out of the 2560. The information you've posted does not match what we've seen out of either turbo, so please do not take our skepticism as personal attack. We are just trying to understand.

How much power did Paul make on his 2560 & AbsurdFlow setup? AFAIK that's as good as it got with a 2560.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 01:50 PM
  #46  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

+1 to all of what G said
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 02:56 PM
  #47  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Paul's best was somewhere around 311rwhp@17psi. on a dynojet with 93 octane, MS2. '99 engine, BEGI cast intake mani. but 304rwhp at 14psi at the same day, so it was at it's limit. I think torques were around 260's.

E85 + MS3? I don't know. I trust Ben but that's nuts.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 02:58 PM
  #48  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

If legit, i want to drive that car. I bet it's horrifying.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 03:22 PM
  #49  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default



Red line is Soviet's car on gas IIRC. 84mm bottom end, stock BP4W head, EFR6758, 400whp@20psi. Just sayin'
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 03:28 PM
  #50  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I thought 400whp was at something closer to 26-27psi (maybe even 29psi) for soviet on pump gas.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 03:30 PM
  #51  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

No, that was the max power ALLOFIT run.


Look at the top of the picture, gives details on the red line run.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 03:36 PM
  #52  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

It is HRK's locost that Ben is talking about and this is the build thread for the locost7. Here is the original dyno thread from last year where the 2560 dyno was first shown.

Last edited by shuiend; Jun 17, 2014 at 03:57 PM.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 04:17 PM
  #53  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Wait, this manifold or something else?

Originally Posted by hrk
1.5 MM overbore actually, block filler used in water jackets up to waterpump to add stiffness .
Wiseco pistons with 8.8 compression ratio after decking and adjusting the squish and compression ratio.

turbo info on my for sale ad:
The compressor has GARRET A/R 60 M24 1-1 on the casting.
The bearing housing has
HJ 01 06J
14411-69F00
466541-1
Turbine housing has Garret 2
turbine inlet flange is 72 mm x 45 mm with holes for 10 mm studs. T25.

https://www.miataturbo.net/miata-par...ops-etc-69843/

Same log manifold made from weld-els used in this setup.


Old Jun 17, 2014 | 04:44 PM
  #54  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by Savington

Red line is Soviet's car on gas IIRC. 84mm bottom end, stock BP4W head, EFR6758, 400whp@20psi. Just sayin'
6758 may be a better choice, but IMO the 6258 leaves something to be desired.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 05:00 PM
  #55  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

I think the big question is, what makes your experience so different? Normally a 10 PSI 2560 setup makes about 220 whp. But a similar setup at 10 psi on the 6258 bends rods.

Why?
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 05:07 PM
  #56  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

I'm also wondering why a 6258 on a "better" built motor would spool shittier than a 6758 on a somewhat half-assed motor (no offense to Soviet.)
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 05:15 PM
  #57  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

because math

oh wait
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 06:24 PM
  #58  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
I'm also wondering why a 6258 on a "better" built motor would spool shittier than a 6758 on a somewhat half-assed motor (no offense to Soviet.)
Our dynapack doesn't seem to let little motors spool up as well as actual driving does.

Originally Posted by turbofan
I think the big question is, what makes your experience so different? Normally a 10 PSI 2560 setup makes about 220 whp. But a similar setup at 10 psi on the 6258 bends rods.

Why?
What 6258 setup bends rods? Who else has done a comparison, same car, same dyno, same motor?

I have complete faith in the dyno results because I was there. Everybody expected the BW EFR to blow away the Garrett. Everybody was surprised when it didn't.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 06:26 PM
  #59  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Pretty much everyone on this site who has put any EFR on a stock motor has ended up with bent rods, regardless of boost level.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 06:34 PM
  #60  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Ben
Our dynapack doesn't seem to let little motors spool up as well as actual driving does.
you can fix that you know. dynapac gives you to power to hold the car for a second or two before starting the pull and it allows you to control the length of the pull. When I dyno'ed at a spec miata shop on a dynapac they only had it setup for SMs and I really didnt want to make a 25 second long 4th gear pull, with 7 a second hold at the start of the pull. So I think I dropped it to 3 seconds and a 15 second long pull because those were the numbers I pulled out of my *** on the spot.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.