GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2008, 05:50 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat

this is from 2001

The blue trace is my car / 167 kPa boost
The red trace is a GT2560 on a gen 1 FM2 / NA 1.8 / 13 psi.
Attached Thumbnails GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat-gt2554-gt2560-2001.jpg  
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 06:49 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

242 is really impressive for a 2554.


HOLY ****! Only 167kpa??>?!>!!>#$!@
paul is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 07:04 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
JTod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 97
Total Cats: -6
Default

I realize the turbo is different now but how do you think the ETD shorty compares to the AVO flow wise? The AVO appears to be the best flowing cast mani available.
JTod is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 08:48 PM
  #4  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Better.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 08:53 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I've said all along.

67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.

Power is just then a function of how little your torque droops at high RPM.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:15 PM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

Assuming 67 kPa boost, 167 kPA Absolute.

Nice num-bars.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:33 PM
  #7  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
67 (dynojet) ft-lbs per liter per atmo of MAP is what you can get with good tuning and an efficient setup. Maybe as high as 71-72.

formula is spot on to my last good dyno run. 205 rwtq @ 13psi.

67 * 1.6 * 1.884 = 202rwtq
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:51 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

hmm, not for me

67 * 1.8 * 2 != 300

x * 1.8 * 2 = 300

x = 83
paul is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:53 PM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!

that actually ends up spot on

67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241

I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
paul is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:56 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
patsmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,297
Total Cats: 477
Default

Originally Posted by paul
****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!
A mistake you see and more importantly you understand. Fail is how many don't understand the difference.
patsmx5 is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:35 PM
  #11  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,494
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Man, I have been hoping to break 250 on Friday when I go to the dyno.

Looking at my last plot (with the bad turbine), I was holding torque flat till 6500.

Based off these numbers I should be close to 268rwhp at 15 pounds.
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:49 PM
  #12  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by paul
****, i did hp, not torque. FAIL!

that actually ends up spot on

67 * 1.8 * 2 = 241

I rounded the 14psi up to 2bar just for the hell of it. Car did make 242. Without rounding that puts me at 68.
actually you only fail because 1 bar = 14.5 psi...

1 atm = 14.7psi (101.3 kpa)



lets see...based on my last dyno @9.5psi 211 ft-lb / (1.8L * 1.646) = 71.2 ft-lb/L
y8s is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 11:28 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Looks like perhaps y8s is getting 71 because his giant turbo is operating at crossover (TIP < MAP)
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 12:23 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by paul
242 is really impressive for a 2554.
HOLY ****! Only 167kpa??>?!>!!>#$!@
This SAE 242 number is at the flywheel right? Not the wheels... otherwise my plot really sucks at 215wheel, 250flywheel (14psi, GT2560R).
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 12:37 PM
  #15  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

Originally Posted by JasonC SBB
Looks like perhaps y8s is getting 71 because his giant turbo is operating at crossover (TIP < MAP)
someone should tell the guy with the dyno dynamics setup. i made 226 ft-lbs there--at the same boost.

tell me more about this "crossover" region and how I can use it to make my car more awesome.
y8s is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 03:08 PM
  #16  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

In a street car being in crossover sacrifices spoolup.

Spookyfish those are dynojet numbers ergo whp.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
10-03-2015 11:04 AM
Trent
WTB
2
10-01-2015 12:15 PM



Quick Reply: GT2554 / AVO / stock 2000 / custom 2.5 exhaust + cat



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.