Notices

10psi Greddy Turbo

Old Oct 13, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #61  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by BenR
Interesting that your tuner tunes the spark maps for knock and not power.

find where you knock...retard a couple degrees, enjoy max powah.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #62  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
find where you knock...retard a couple degrees, enjoy max powah.



Knock threshold isn't always where you make the most power.

If you're going through the trouble to tune each specific spark cell, why not turn for where you make the most power safely within the threshold, enstead of finding where it knocks then turn it back 1/4 degree?
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #63  
ray_sir_6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Guest
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 714
Total Cats: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by BenR
+2

Wasn't there going to be a race? I'd rather see direct results between your car and a few MS greddy cars at the drag strip on the same day. But I know that's not going to happen. It's way easier to print dyno sheets.

Interesting that your tuner tunes the spark maps for knock and not power.
We both decided to not run, since the MS car was still running the base map, and I hadn't turned the boost back down.

I already mentioned doing a dyno day here if people were interested. I know there are several people with MS in the DFW area, and you can't dispute same day, same dyno results.

Right now I am more concerned with getting the car running over 10psi. So Walbro 255HP and new wastegate actuator are on the list, probably done tonight or tomorrow. Then we play with the boost and see what we get at 12, 15, and 18psi. Might have to dial it back, since I don't want over 280whp. Then the car is going to a local driver's event at MSR on Sunday. Should be fun!
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #64  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

If I was in DFW I'd definately show up for a dyno day.

I'd love to see direct comparisons on the same day and same dyno, but really, the maps should be similar, to really make any clear claims that the AEM is better.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #65  
ray_sir_6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Guest
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 714
Total Cats: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Why not just tune it the same way we did....log 6 street pulls. From there we made 1 change on the dyno for the WG tune. We made 3 or 4 changes on the 10psi tune. So far we have about 30-40min of tuning time invested, and alot of that was finding out that the WG won't hold 10psi, and that the fuel pump was maxed out. So maybe 30min of USEFUL tuning time.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #66  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Originally Posted by ray_sir_6
Why not just tune it the same way we did....


Because then, you're comparing who is/has a better tuner, not a better EMS.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #67  
ray_sir_6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Guest
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 714
Total Cats: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by BenR
Because then, you're comparing who is/has a better tuner, not a better EMS.
Ease of tuning is also part of having a better EMS. So shouldn't you be able to come up with similar numbers doing the same tuning technique?

Does MS even have a Boost Comp map? That is where most of our tuning is. We tuned at 0 boost/0 vaccuum and then boost comp'd the rest.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #68  
BenR's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,862
Total Cats: 1
From: ABQ, NM
Default

Originally Posted by ray_sir_6
Ease of tuning is also part of having a better EMS. So shouldn't you be able to come up with similar numbers doing the same tuning technique?

Does MS even have a Boost Comp map? That is where most of our tuning is. We tuned at 0 boost/0 vaccuum and then boost comp'd the rest.



Megasquirt is about as dead easy to tune as I've seen.

But I'm biased, hardware wise the AEM is amazing, but I've had personal experience where there was issues the factory master tuners couldn't solve.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #69  
paul's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Default

I think the AEM is a great EMS but where are all the guys making more power than me, earlier than me with my lowly MS on a gt2560r on a stock 99 motor?

I'm self taught on the MS and it's the first EMS I've ever tuned. Both times I've dyno'd the car the only time tuning was the drive there. The setups were just finished the night before.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #70  
Mach929's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,494
Total Cats: 0
From: lansdale PA
Default

explain to me why fuel and spark timing is different on one tuning platform than another. i have a much easier time accepting that some dynos read higher than others
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #71  
jwarriner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 564
Total Cats: 1
From: Denver, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Mach929
explain to me why fuel and spark timing is different on one tuning platform than another.
Resolution?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
Apr 12, 2021 04:21 PM
Rick02R
WTB
3
Jan 3, 2016 07:18 PM
tazswing
Race Prep
20
Oct 3, 2015 11:04 AM
cale saurage
DIY Turbo Discussion
16
Oct 1, 2015 11:25 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.