Notices

GT2554R Record??? leads to a run of the mill EFR build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:25 PM
  #201  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

nonsense. Pretendingtofgt is about to disprove the whole 1.8>1.6 myth

you guyths need to embrace da future
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:32 PM
  #202  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
timing breaks rods.\

he didn't need all that horsepower to beat a c6.
*C5 Z06, and I know. I had planned this day (the 300hp attempt part, not the blown engine) ever since I pulled the trigger on the 2860R a couple months ago, Corvette guy just happened to challenge me at the perfect time so it lined up. It was fun while it lasted and I knew the risk, time to start over!
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:37 PM
  #203  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

VVT.

you're welcome.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:46 PM
  #204  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
VVT.

you're welcome.
But is it realllllyyyy worth it over a standard BP4W??
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:49 PM
  #205  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

As an aside, overboost protection won't cause a total loss in oil pressure. The oil pump is still spinning at ~6000rpm regardless of whether the injectors are on or not. You will lose some pressure briefly, but that's just because the bearings aren't as heavily loaded as they were a split-second beforehand. IOW, hitting overboost didn't break the rod, but ~300whp on a stock bottom end did
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 02:04 PM
  #206  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
As an aside, overboost protection won't cause a total loss in oil pressure. The oil pump is still spinning at ~6000rpm regardless of whether the injectors are on or not. You will lose some pressure briefly, but that's just because the bearings aren't as heavily loaded as they were a split-second beforehand. IOW, hitting overboost didn't break the rod, but ~300whp on a stock bottom end did
Yeah I'm not thinking the oil pressure had anything to do with the rod failure, I was thinking going from 235wtq into a full power cut and then back on boost was probably pretty stressful for the rods (rapid changes in torque?) because it developed the ticking sound immediately after that happened. The wording int he video was a little confusing because when I was leaving the dyno we still hadn't figured out what was damaged.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 02:45 PM
  #207  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by 1993z32
But is it realllllyyyy worth it over a standard BP4W??
A standard BP4W isn't going to give you 150rwhp as a base...
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 03:25 PM
  #208  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
A standard BP4W isn't going to give you 150rwhp as a base...
4w is a z3 or 6d with slightly less midrange
it will make same power

there is nothing wrong with starting with a 4w
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 04:46 PM
  #209  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

nothing wrong except that's it's missing out on a bucket full of mid-range and no extra top end (especially once you bolt up a square top) -- out of the box.

If youre going to do a motor swap, do it right.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 05:01 PM
  #210  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

It really does make a huge, huge difference between 3000 and 4000rpm. I've posted charts comparing them before, since I had the same 2871R setup on a BP4W and a BP6D head. Especially with larger turbos, the difference is dramatic.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 05:32 PM
  #211  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
nothing wrong except that's it's missing out on a bucket full of mid-range and no extra top end (especially once you bolt up a square top) -- out of the box.

If youre going to do a motor swap, do it right.
midrange yes.
topend same.
get your NB knowledge straight, old timer

Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:11 PM
  #212  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
It really does make a huge, huge difference between 3000 and 4000rpm. I've posted charts comparing them before, since I had the same 2871R setup on a BP4W and a BP6D head. Especially with larger turbos, the difference is dramatic.
Im personally limiting the power of even 2560r cars in that range due to drivetrain reliability and traction. In what scenario is having even more than a 2560r on a BP4W worth it (300 odd ftlb)? Autocross with a built everything huge huge wing and slicks?

Dann
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:27 PM
  #213  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

more? probably not. but having 300tq when running good tires and 3.6 final drive is pretty cool
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:32 PM
  #214  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1993z32
Yeah I'm not thinking the oil pressure had anything to do with the rod failure, I was thinking going from 235wtq into a full power cut and then back on boost was probably pretty stressful for the rods (rapid changes in torque?)
Nah, the rod sees larger compressive load changes every other crank rotation because it's a 4-stroke. A power stroke is maximum compressive load, an intake stroke is maximum tensile load (worst when pulling against a vacuum in the manifold).

--Ian
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:39 PM
  #215  
aidandj's Avatar
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I think the boost cut was just coincidence. And it was doomed anyways.
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 11:59 AM
  #216  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
I think the boost cut was just coincidence. And it was doomed anyways.
Just odd that it's been putting down roughly 240wtq for a year, and it was only making 230-235 all day, and after a very abrupt OBP limit it was game over. But it's anyone's guess really. I'm interested to see what the other 3 rods look like.
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 12:22 PM
  #217  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Like most of the members on this site, they likely aren't straight
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 12:23 PM
  #218  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Like most of the members on this site, they likely aren't straight
Ahhhhh where's the drumset emoji when I need it most
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 12:26 PM
  #219  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by 1993z32
Just odd that it's been putting down roughly 240wtq for a year, and it was only making 230-235 all day, and after a very abrupt OBP limit it was game over. But it's anyone's guess really. I'm interested to see what the other 3 rods look like.
Where did you have the redline set? Did you rev it higher when upping the boost? Ever miss a shift and hit 2nd instead of 4th?

AIUI, most rods fail in tension (that's where they're weakest), usually at high-RPM with vacuum in the intake manifold (maximum tensile load), and it's not unusual for something that weakens a rod to result in it a seemingly random failure days or weeks later.

FWIW, my stock motor had arrow-striaght rods when I took it apart, with 50K boosted miles on it, much of those at 250-260 rwtq.

--Ian
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 12:50 PM
  #220  
1993z32's Avatar
Thread Starter
TheCarPassionChannel
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
From: San Diego, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
Where did you have the redline set? Did you rev it higher when upping the boost? Ever miss a shift and hit 2nd instead of 4th?

AIUI, most rods fail in tension (that's where they're weakest), usually at high-RPM with vacuum in the intake manifold (maximum tensile load), and it's not unusual for something that weakens a rod to result in it a seemingly random failure days or weeks later.

FWIW, my stock motor had arrow-striaght rods when I took it apart, with 50K boosted miles on it, much of those at 250-260 rwtq.

--Ian
Yeah it definitely saw a few flashes of unsafe RPM in its day, mostly due to times when the flatshift was being temperamental and I'd get a nice little 7700rpm overrev despite the limiter being at 7300. The engine has been through a LOT. I was just thinking the OBP was the straw that broke the camel's back, because the ticking sound developed immediately afterwards, and it was loudest right by where the rod exited, making me think it might have been bent enough to be tapping the bottom of the cylinder wall?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 PM.