Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda 3.5L V6 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2015 | 11:38 AM
  #141  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by soviet
TKO has "muncie 4 speed" pattern, which is only same as early Chevy T5 transmissions. Most T5 are ford pattern.
I just scaled my car and found out some interesting information. The weight for the engine and transmission is 460lbs.

6 speed transmission
stock flywheel
happy meal clutch
engine
stock intake
FM turbo exhaust manifold
2560 turbo
alternator
no PS
no AC
trans oil, engine oil, radiator water
driveshaft

So if you're going to swap out an engine and transmission, this is your baseline weight to get 250whp. Of course, you'll need to go through the same game if you're swapping differentials and half shafts.
Old Apr 1, 2015 | 11:47 AM
  #142  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
I just scaled my car and found out some interesting information. The weight for the engine and transmission is 460lbs.

6 speed transmission
stock flywheel
happy meal clutch
engine
stock intake
FM turbo exhaust manifold
2560 turbo
alternator
no PS
no AC
trans oil, engine oil, radiator water
driveshaft

So if you're going to swap out an engine and transmission, this is your baseline weight to get 250whp. Of course, you'll need to go through the same game if you're swapping differentials and half shafts.
**** thats heavy dropping 80-100 lbs with the right motor in front of a T5 shouldnt be terribly hard.
Old Apr 1, 2015 | 12:52 PM
  #143  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
**** thats heavy dropping 80-100 lbs with the right motor in front of a T5 shouldnt be terribly hard.
**** just got real yo!

I think the J35 might even be lighter than a 1.8 with turbo or Rotrex. The LFX might be lighter too? Maybe not with the transmission and other upgrades, but with the tradeoff being a more bulletproof drivetrain.

Last edited by cordycord; Apr 3, 2015 at 12:03 AM.
Old Apr 1, 2015 | 01:16 PM
  #144  
Midtenn's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 310
From: Murfreesboro,TN
Default

Not to mention moving the center of mass back into chassis and lower.
Old Apr 3, 2015 | 09:21 PM
  #145  
Corey's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 76
Total Cats: 0
Default

I feel like I started posting this a long time ago, but never did it. It's a J-series S2000 swap, but the mounts are what matters.

Turbo J32A2 S2000 build thread - S2KI Honda S2000 Forums

Edit: Got them uploaded:


Attached Thumbnails Honda 3.5L V6 swap-608395c1a97f2f15ddf31eece09b1e76_zpszxk1y19x.jpg   Honda 3.5L V6 swap-64b16cbf4a00afc886a48de1459d2bc0_zpsr6v3qwjo.jpg  

Last edited by Corey; Apr 3, 2015 at 09:34 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 08:35 PM
  #146  
paNX2K&SE-R's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 776
Total Cats: 24
From: Mocksville, NC
Default

That's a lot better. Now it just needs an oil pan solution that keeps the Miata rack in the stock location.
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 09:58 PM
  #147  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Yep. No stock steering rack location, no care.
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 11:23 PM
  #148  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Where is the starter in that s2000 swap?
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 11:48 PM
  #149  
williams805's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
From: Goleta, Southern California
Default

They made a cutout in the oil pan. Still on the bottom.
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 02:35 PM
  #150  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Somebody put a big roots style blower on one of these.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 01:15 AM
  #151  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Wait, the J series is SOHC?
Attached Thumbnails Honda 3.5L V6 swap-what_year_is_it.jpg  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 01:35 AM
  #152  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by soviet
Wait, the J series is SOHC?
Yep. SOHC. And 4 valves per cylinder. And VTEC.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 02:11 AM
  #153  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Honestly in my mind, the SOHC alone makes this infinitely inferior to LFX swap.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 06:10 AM
  #154  
Corey's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 76
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Yep. No stock steering rack location, no care.
I don't see why a rear sump pan and pickup can't be made to allow the use of the stock rack and stock location. Obviously that would require moving the starter to a more traditional spot, though. I don't see why one couldn't place the starter on a stand-off mount like what Claire and the other KLDE/KLZE guys are using.

Originally Posted by soviet
Honestly in my mind, the SOHC alone makes this infinitely inferior to LFX swap.
The engine design is at least 10 years older. Base engine against base engine it may be inferior, but the market for tuning the j-series is huge. All that said, I really like the idea of the LFX swap. Using all OEM stuff is nice.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 09:14 AM
  #155  
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,317
Total Cats: 99
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by soviet
Honestly in my mind, the SOHC alone makes this infinitely inferior to LFX swap.
SOHC makes the engine package as a whole smaller = easier to fit in your tight space.

SOHC (and belt drive) gives the engine very low friction characteristics = good cruising mpgs

SOHC makes the engine lighter



On paper, the J series is a pretty simple, almost archaic engine. In the real world you drive a J powered car and the last thing on your mind is "Man, this thing would be soooo much better if it was DOHC!" The engine as a whole package is excellent, can make great, reliable power NA and make crazy numbers when adding boost.

Obviously the merits of DOHC are well known and there's a reason the J engine seemed to top out around 300hp in OEM (vs ~350 of a VQ) but please don't discount this engine solely on the fact that it's SOHC, that's just ignorant.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 09:44 AM
  #156  
karter74's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 690
Total Cats: 23
From: Centennial, CO
Default

I find it humorous people discount an engine because its "only" SOHC. People haven't seemed to mind too much about the whole pushrod/2 valve thing in the LSx swaps.....

Thats the equivalent of complaining about the LSx and going with a DOHC mod motor because its DOHC.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:12 AM
  #157  
jakeordie's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
SOHC makes the engine package as a whole smaller = easier to fit in your tight space.

SOHC (and belt drive) gives the engine very low friction characteristics = good cruising mpgs

SOHC makes the engine lighter



On paper, the J series is a pretty simple, almost archaic engine. In the real world you drive a J powered car and the last thing on your mind is "Man, this thing would be soooo much better if it was DOHC!" The engine as a whole package is excellent, can make great, reliable power NA and make crazy numbers when adding boost.

Obviously the merits of DOHC are well known and there's a reason the J engine seemed to top out around 300hp in OEM (vs ~350 of a VQ) but please don't discount this engine solely on the fact that it's SOHC, that's just ignorant.
Yeah, it's a trickle-down version of the NSX engine;

Honda C engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Simpler, lighter, cheaper.....better for 99% of users. Comparing this swap to the LSx is missing the point, different strokes for different folks.
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 10:20 AM
  #158  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

don't get carried away ladies, this doesn't even come close to touching the LS

.... and many of us are still not impressed at all when comparing this to the K's, which are making serious progress and showing impressive potential...but that's off topic so I'll just leave it at that
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 11:45 AM
  #159  
KMiata's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 635
Total Cats: 322
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
.... and many of us are still not impressed at all when comparing this to the K's, which are making serious progress and showing impressive potential...but that's off topic so I'll just leave it at that
Our thoughts exactly. I never want to knock a competitor's product, but I do think you get what you pay for with swaps like this. There sure are some strange design choices with this J kit.

Anyone actually finish the swap? Any track footage (from the manufacturer or a customer)?
__________________
KPower Industries
Home of the original KMiata Swap




K24 NC swap is coming in 2024! Learn more

info@kpower.industries
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram







Old Apr 6, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #160  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,398
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default bench racing

One of the hallmarks of a good bench racing BS session is that you should not have all the information. Conjecture and misinformation only makes the discussion more fun.

So on that note I apologize for contacting SuperFastMinis to get more information about the steering and oil pan. Norm at SuperFast said,

"The oil pan in the V6 Miata is approx .700" below the bottom of the stock K member. You will drag the bolt heads on the cross brace of a stock NB frame before you get to the oil pan. I can decrease the capacity of the pan from 6 to 5 qts., raising it .690", but I would rather have the capacity over the clearance. I have a Touge Run chin spoiler on one car that is one inch below the oil pan.

The rack and pinion is lowered approx .625" and has minimal bump steer in a firm stock height setup. Lowering the car considerably amplifies it somewhat. I have developed a rack offset kit that eliminates bump steer and actually be adjusted to give better steer characteristics in lowered cars. I will eventually add it to the kit."

Now since I would be considering an engine swap for a Catfish rather than a Miata, it means that I have more options than a Miata to move the engine in the bay--I may be able to keep the stock steering rack location, for example. Also, since the car is considerably lighter than a stock Miata, it also means that there's less stress on a stock drivetrain--I need to worry less about grenading a transmission or pumpkiin.

The difference between the LFX and J35 -- besides horsepower -- seems to be weight and robustness. The LFX will weigh more, but will have a stout transmission that can handle the ponies. I assume that a pumpkin change and driveline upgrade would be in the cards too.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.