Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

My Reroute drawing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:01 PM
  #181  
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -100
From: Bell Tuning & Performance
Default

It is machined for t-stat. Just on the other side.

So change the second 3/8 NPT to a 1/8 NPT?
Stephanie
Attached Thumbnails My Reroute drawing-p2265831.jpg  
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #182  
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -100
From: Bell Tuning & Performance
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
I don't think the 3/8 NPT hole for connection to the upper radiator hose is necessary. A 1/8 NPT port for sending units like my vgauges sending unit would be better utilized. A similar "spacer bung" that you used before would work. The upper radiator hose will be connected via the kia waterneck.
What if a kia neck is not used and the stock one is? It still needs an upper radiator hose connection then. We can make individual housings, but I still need to do a kit as well.
Stephanie
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #183  
Skittles's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
Default

That piece, a flat block off plate that I could drill and thread myself for the 1.6 sensor if needed and the pipe for the cold side and it's a damn fine kit I think.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #184  
cueball1's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
From: Tigard, Oregon
Default

OK. Here's the dumb *** question of this thread.

Can this be done with the motor still in the car?
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #185  
levnubhin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
From: Va Beach
Default

Originally Posted by cueball1
OK. Here's the dumb *** question of this thread.

Can this be done with the motor still in the car?

Yeah, it ain't easy and you will shed some blood but it can be done. Will require removal of the coil pack and probably the CAS on 1.8 cars.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #186  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

the cas no. removing the coil pack definately makes it MUCH easier to do
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 03:00 PM
  #187  
cueball1's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,875
Total Cats: 2
From: Tigard, Oregon
Default

Coilpack is already bye bye with Sav's Cops on my car so that's good to know.

I'm not a big guy but I've got fat stubby hands and popeye forearms that don't work so well around the Miata engine bay. I'm used to bleeding. My hands looked like I'd been wrestling a bobcat after installing my HD HC bar last week. I'm not all that careful around sharp objects and edges.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #188  
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -100
From: Bell Tuning & Performance
Default

Upon looking at it further, I think we are going to move the 2nd 3/8 NPT bung next to the other one. If we leave it where it is, it might interfere with a plug on the back of the engine. And the thermostat groove does need to be moved to the other side.
Stephanie

Last edited by Stephanie Turner; Feb 27, 2009 at 03:30 PM.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #189  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Stephanie Turner
What if a kia neck is not used and the stock one is? It still needs an upper radiator hose connection then.
No.

Whether a person uses a stock 1.6L neck, a Kia neck, or a Protege neck, they all work pretty much the same. It covers the back of the spacer and provides a large outlet for the water going out to the radiator. Under no circumstances is it desirable for water to exit the spacer and go direct to the radiator, as that would be pre-thermostat.

Have another look at the pictures that Braineack posted in message #175. That's the stock 1.6L water neck, with the fitting where the thermoswitch would be cut down and plugged. The large outlet on the side is what will feed the radiator. The only difference between that piece and the Sephia / Protege unit is that the latter do not have the sensor fitting, thus they require less labor as you don't have to bother plugging up a hole.


Why is the M12x1.5 fitting in the form of a threaded bung which is welded on?
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #190  
Skittles's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
Default

I think I see where Stephanie is unsure...

The spacer is used to output water to the heater core and then the front 1.6 neck is used to sent water to the rad with the T-stat between the neck and the spacer.

This is why the groove must be on the firewall side when the spacer is on the head.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #191  
Stephanie Turner's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,337
Total Cats: -100
From: Bell Tuning & Performance
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Why is the M12x1.5 fitting in the form of a threaded bung which is welded on?
That is just what the machinist put on there. It can be changed.
Stephanie
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:35 PM
  #192  
Skittles's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 27
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Stephanie Turner
That is just what the machinist put on there. It can be changed.
Stephanie
that could actually be good to leave it there depending on placement so temp sensors dont hit the t-stat in there.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:41 PM
  #193  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Stephanie Turner
That is just what the machinist put on there. It can be changed.
Hmmm. I'm sure it probably raises the cost, but on the other hand, the stock CLT sensor, having a non-tapered thread, will probably benefit from having a flat surface to mate to. I'm sure we can trim it down as necessary to ensure that the sensor element is not shrouded.

I'm really liking this design.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 04:57 PM
  #194  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Hmmm. I'm sure it probably raises the cost, but on the other hand, the stock CLT sensor, having a non-tapered thread, will probably benefit from having a flat surface to mate to.
IMO that is a must. The stock CLT, on the NB anyway, is a face seal like a banjo fitting, not a thread seal like a NPT.

Great thread BTW! Joe Perez for President.

I am in the middle of a spacerless reroute and would post up some picts, but am not since it is only partially relevant to this discussion; I do not want to muddy the waters. The spacerless reroute would be near impossible without the head out of the car IMO since one has to drill and tap a 3/8" NPT hole into the head at the back.

FWIW I am using the stock '99 thermostat cover on the rear (pointing straight up at 12 o-clock) and routing the radiator return under the intake manifold. The heater core feed is pre-thermostat as I think it should be. I am also sending the heater core out into the mixing manifold a-la the stock configuration.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #195  
Eraser-X's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 100
Total Cats: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

OK guys I have the BEGi prototype spacer in my hands and I am ordering the thermostat cover from the Kia dealer Monday should have it Tuesday.

I also was able to get hte part numbers for the Kia Thermostat housing cover
Part #
0K24715172A
My dealer wants $18.19 for it plus $2 to over night it

The Mazda part is
B6BF15172 and they are much more proud of that parts and priced it at 33.73
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #196  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Hmmm. I'm sure it probably raises the cost, but on the other hand, the stock CLT sensor, having a non-tapered thread, will probably benefit from having a flat surface to mate to. I'm sure we can trim it down as necessary to ensure that the sensor element is not shrouded.

That's why i had suggested the bung in the first place.








Old Feb 27, 2009 | 11:45 PM
  #197  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Eraser-X
OK guys I have the BEGi prototype spacer in my hands and I am ordering the thermostat cover from the Kia dealer Monday should have it Tuesday.

I also was able to get hte part numbers for the Kia Thermostat housing cover
Part #
0K24715172A
My dealer wants $18.19 for it plus $2 to over night it

The Mazda part is
B6BF15172 and they are much more proud of that parts and priced it at 33.73
non-Tommy/Finishline Rosenthal Nissan Mazda has it for 18 something. plus they are kinda cool and send their driver to my work heh

Rosenthal Nissan-Mazda Parts and Accessories
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 01:38 PM
  #198  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

ok I'm done. Looks like the OEM upper hose will work perfectly from the outlet to the 16" hardline, so I should just need to only have to source some odd S-bend.

that 3/8-18 NPT was a bitch to tap:



Old Feb 28, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #199  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,405
Total Cats: 558
From: Houston, TX
Default

Did you use cutting fluid? Taping stuff is easy if you cut square and use cutting fluid and proper technique.
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #200  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,541
Total Cats: 4,364
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
Did you use cutting fluid? Taping stuff is easy if you cut square and use cutting fluid and proper technique.
I used a 9/16 (0.5625") dill bit, not a 37/64 (0.578").

I think the main issue was it was still cutting new threads as it started tapering out the cut ones. No biggie, it's done and ready to rock & roll.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 AM.