Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

On relieving crankcase pressure, PCVs, catch cans, breathers and whatnot...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2019, 06:07 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
whitrzac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 254
Total Cats: 5
Default

Pardon my noobishness, but in subaru land every catch can, AOS, PCV vent setup all needed a constant vacuum source pre-turbo. Non of the proposed setups I've seen do that, they rely on the intake manifold for vacuum and look like they would be back feeding the catch can and pressurizing the crankcase under boost.
whitrzac is offline  
Old 05-09-2019, 06:38 PM
  #42  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,031
Total Cats: 6,596
Default

Originally Posted by whitrzac
Pardon my noobishness, but in subaru land every catch can, AOS, PCV vent setup all needed a constant vacuum source pre-turbo. Non of the proposed setups I've seen do that, they rely on the intake manifold for vacuum and look like they would be back feeding the catch can and pressurizing the crankcase under boost.
"Need" is subjective.

Venting the seperator tank into the turbo inlet does improve scavenging efficiency very slightly, and it also decreases emissions a tad. But if any oil mist / vapor is coming out of said tank, it'll wind up condensing inside the intercooler, and that's bad.

For seriously high-rev engines with major blowby concerns, we don't vent into the intake manifold. And even when we do, a PCV valve and / or check valve should prevent positive pressure in the intake manifold during boost from back-feeding into the crank case.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-09-2019, 11:45 PM
  #43  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,609
Total Cats: 567
Default

I just read this, found it in another thread: http://www.shophemi.com/images/media..._ccv_bible.pdf

This guy is pretty adament about there being a slight vacuum source at all time. I will say that since hooking my VC up to the stock PCV setup (with check valve and catch can), and the hotside pre-turbo, It notably helped with oil burning/smells after boosting.

Thinking about trying the setup where you delete the PCV and both lines go catch can then pre turbo. Should put a slight vac on things at all times and keep the engine happy.
Fireindc is offline  
Old 05-10-2019, 04:29 AM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
muoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 413
Total Cats: 69
Default

hmm. ..what about using cheap chinese 12v electric vacuum pumps? suck the oil vapors through catch-can to atmosphere
muoto is offline  
Old 05-10-2019, 05:28 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
HarryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 140
Default

This is something that has crossed my mind multiple times, but I am not sure on the CFM required for them to be effective. Guess it would be easy/cheap enough to experiment with one. There's also an option to use an OEM GM pump.
HarryB is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 04:02 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Alejo_NIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 587
Total Cats: 19
Default

Originally Posted by muoto
hmm. ..what about using cheap chinese 12v electric vacuum pumps? suck the oil vapors through catch-can to atmosphere
i would imagine they won't lasyt since the fumes are pretty bad to rubber not meant for fuel. it'll just eat up the inside and gunk them up.
Alejo_NIN is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 05:09 PM
  #47  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,031
Total Cats: 6,596
Default

Originally Posted by muoto
hmm. ..what about using cheap chinese 12v electric vacuum pumps? suck the oil vapors through catch-can to atmosphere
We're talking about pumps intended to run power brake boosters and whatnot on electric / diesel engines, correct?

The blowby coming from an engine running under heavy load at high RPM is going to massively exceed the capacity of such a device. Like, by orders of magnitude. The pump would become a restriction to flow.

The slash-cut pipe is a proven, inexpensive, reliable solution to provide forced evacuation of an engine running at high load.
Joe Perez is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 06:36 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
2manyhobyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Crest Hill, IL
Posts: 742
Total Cats: 42
Default



Check into a smog pump. This one happens to be VW, it moves an insane amount of air. Will have it's own seperate relay at @ 15 amps.

Last edited by 2manyhobyz; 05-13-2019 at 06:40 PM. Reason: Typo
2manyhobyz is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 10:43 AM
  #49  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Godless Commie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
Default

I am designing a custom breather tank setup per sixshooter's recommendations.
There will be 2 5/8" ID hard lines coming out from the the valve cover; one just behind the oil cap, on top of the vc, and one from the original PCV port location.

Question:

Do I have to weld outlet ports on the valve cover?
Would it be possible to use grommets instead? (If grommets are OK, I will use them on the breather tank, as well.)

Using grommets will make my life much easier.
What do you think?
Godless Commie is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:06 PM
  #50  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

Originally Posted by Godless Commie
I am designing a custom breather tank setup per sixshooter's recommendations.
There will be 2 5/8" ID hard lines coming out from the the valve cover; one just behind the oil cap, on top of the vc, and one from the original PCV port location.

Question:

Do I have to weld outlet ports on the valve cover?
Would it be possible to use grommets instead? (If grommets are OK, I will use them on the breather tank, as well.)

Using grommets will make my life much easier.
What do you think?

I already did a bunch of this.

1.0 made a venturi, pre turbo- worked great, made a lot of vacuum, filled my intercooler with oil.

2.0 valve cover: welded a bung on one side, other side, made a custom slip fit adapter, 13mm (aprox) that slides into a grommet and has a -10 male on the other end.

3.0 drilled and vented block: one location dumps oil, the other does not.

Ill drop some pics later if wanted.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:57 PM
  #51  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,656
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

Grommets might be okay if they are good and tight. You don't want leakage between the grommet and the valve cover or between the grommet and the fitting or you will have oil running down the side of the engine. But it is not a pressurized arrangement, especially with large-diameter hoses or pipes.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 01:29 PM
  #52  
Junior Member
 
cpierr03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 287
Total Cats: 33
Default

I drilled with a 3/4 inch bit and tapped with 1/2 inch NPT. Sealed with JBWeld. Also opened up the valley between chambers, I believe I used 5/16 bit for that?

If I had to do it over again, I might step down to 3/8th NPT on the hot side. That's what I originally drilled/tapped for, the aluminium is too thin in that spot for 1/2 inch hence why it's in there at an angle now. Also had to clearance it to get the baffle cover on it.

Pics here so I don't spam your post

I also drilled/tapped the catch can for the same barbs, they came with 3/8 I believe and I didn't want to reduce flow. No pics of that though - It's not pretty anyways. :P

Last edited by cpierr03; 05-30-2019 at 01:51 PM.
cpierr03 is offline  
Old 06-02-2019, 07:22 PM
  #53  
Junior Member
 
ElyasWolff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 111
Total Cats: 6
Default

This is not as constructive as it is a history lesson.

Just don't make the same mistakes Mazda did with the MSM.

The MSM air oil separator was connected to top of the oil pan like the OP thought. But it was also connected to the PCV valve, and the cold side vent. MSM owners have had trouble with the oil pan line backing up all the way to the oil separator, then having it get sucked into the intake. Then people added a check valve so it was only good as a drain.

All I can say you right to keep it VTA, this should prevent the problems the MSM had.
ElyasWolff is offline  
Old 06-17-2019, 11:40 PM
  #54  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Godless Commie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 3,214
Total Cats: 1,687
Default

I started building the breather tank system I had outlined here before:

Here:

https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...9/#post1539009
Godless Commie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmuse8482
General Miata Chat
4
07-02-2014 12:21 AM
mighty mouse
Engine Performance
52
08-14-2011 12:04 AM
kotomile
Race Prep
15
02-22-2011 02:03 PM
viriiguy
DIY Turbo Discussion
18
04-14-2010 07:19 PM
Snowsurfer03
Prefabbed Turbo Kits
5
04-21-2007 11:21 AM



Quick Reply: On relieving crankcase pressure, PCVs, catch cans, breathers and whatnot...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.