Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #621  
dieselmiata's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,356
Total Cats: 154
From: Volo, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
Don't care, still buying one.
Yup. Me too.
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 04:29 PM
  #622  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

I'd expect mid-30 MPG combined, minimum, with conservative driving. People get that with the current Mazda 3's which are lighter but also have less drivetrain drag because FWD.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 05:28 PM
  #623  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
I'd expect mid-30 MPG combined, minimum, with conservative driving. People get that with the current Mazda 3's which are lighter but also have less drivetrain drag because FWD.
And less drag because coupe. They have the 2.slow skyactive already though so its not like comparing an mx5 with a new tech engine vs a 3 with an old tech engine.

Is it sadder than I'm more excited about seeing how the new version of the 2 is wih the skyactiv than I am the mx5?
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 06:14 PM
  #624  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

I've started to compare the 1.5 to the 94 NA.
Not that far apart in power/weight.

Wonder what the dry weight on the Global CUP car will be...
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 09:10 PM
  #625  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Erat
Don't care, still buying one. That's 55 more HP than my current daily Miata. Probably much better gas mileage too.
155 gross hp.
The na8 was 133 gross in '96 and made roughly 110whp.
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 10:30 PM
  #626  
DeerHunter's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,061
Total Cats: 2,325
From: Canada
Default

A lot of people (not necessarily on this site) are defending this weak-sauce engine spec with the usual "if you can't go fast with 50 hp, then 500 isn't going to help you" aphorism. I'm sure the ND, whatever the power level, will make a fantastic arrive-and-drive track day car. Undoubtedly, it will likewise acquit itself well on any random back road - until you have the need to pass someone who doesn't particularly feel like being passed.

I swear, my decision to add abnormal aspiration was cemented during an otherwise lovely drive through the Redwood Forest in Northern California. I was driving my brother's '97 (already more powerful than my '93 L.E.) and we were stuck behind some dipshit on a Harley. He had more than enough power to leave us on the abbreviated straight-aways, but would literally idle through any and all corners. Now, with unholy amounts of power on tap, people like that become somewhat amusing moving chicanes and my blood pressure has normalized.

Moral of the story: Well, you all know what the moral of the story is.
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 11:04 PM
  #627  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by DeerHunter
A lot of people (not necessarily on this site) are defending this weak-sauce engine spec with the usual "if you can't go fast with 50 hp, then 500 isn't going to help you" aphorism. I'm sure the ND, whatever the power level, will make a fantastic arrive-and-drive track day car. Undoubtedly, it will likewise acquit itself well on any random back road - until you have the need to pass someone who doesn't particularly feel like being passed.

I swear, my decision to add abnormal aspiration was cemented during an otherwise lovely drive through the Redwood Forest in Northern California. I was driving my brother's '97 (already more powerful than my '93 L.E.) and we were stuck behind some dipshit on a Harley. He had more than enough power to leave us on the abbreviated straight-aways, but would literally idle through any and all corners. Now, with unholy amounts of power on tap, people like that become somewhat amusing moving chicanes and my blood pressure has normalized.

Moral of the story: Well, you all know what the moral of the story is.
Or you could have pulled over. But hey, it's Mazda's fault that you got stuck behind that Harley.
Old Jan 30, 2015 | 11:19 PM
  #628  
DeerHunter's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,061
Total Cats: 2,325
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
Or you could have pulled over. But hey, it's Mazda's fault that you got stuck behind that Harley.
You're right - your solution is far superior to mine. Carry on.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:26 AM
  #629  
wannafbody's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

The average Miata buyer isn't looking for a high HP car or else they'd be buying a Mustang.

I think the 2.0 will be a decent engine for the ND.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:28 AM
  #630  
williams805's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
From: Goleta, Southern California
Default

Moral of the story: Don't by a poop putter Harley.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:35 AM
  #631  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
Mazda's media site has the 155/148 number in a table now. The mnet tears... they must flow...
These numbers are surprising to me. Mazda said the motor would be tuned specifically for the miata but this is showing a direct drop in from the 3 on 87 octane. Wouldn't they at least release it with the 91 octane tune from Europe that puts out a little more power or tune it for 93 octane and breach 170hp? I am confused.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:49 AM
  #632  
endura's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 142
Total Cats: 7
From: toronto
Default

Originally Posted by DeerHunter
A lot of people (not necessarily on this site) are defending this weak-sauce engine spec with the usual "if you can't go fast with 50 hp, then 500 isn't going to help you" aphorism. I'm sure the ND, whatever the power level, will make a fantastic arrive-and-drive track day car. Undoubtedly, it will likewise acquit itself well on any random back road - until you have the need to pass someone who doesn't particularly feel like being passed.

I swear, my decision to add abnormal aspiration was cemented during an otherwise lovely drive through the Redwood Forest in Northern California. I was driving my brother's '97 (already more powerful than my '93 L.E.) and we were stuck behind some dipshit on a Harley. He had more than enough power to leave us on the abbreviated straight-aways, but would literally idle through any and all corners. Now, with unholy amounts of power on tap, people like that become somewhat amusing moving chicanes and my blood pressure has normalized.

Moral of the story: Well, you all know what the moral of the story is.
yes, yes, yes.
add to that dipshits on track who don't understand the concept of waving faster people past. nothing like staring at them while passing to see the disbelief on their faces. god bless boost.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 02:23 AM
  #633  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
The average Miata buyer isn't looking for a high HP car or else they'd be buying a Mustang.

I think the 2.0 will be a decent engine for the ND.
I think you're looking at it backwards. I think many more people would consider the Miata if it offered Mustang level if acceleration. Maybe not standard, but they DO have that neat little Mazdaspeed brand....
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:41 AM
  #634  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

This is retarded and a complete waste. If that guy who got the HP right those months ago also got the price right then fuuuuuccckk Mazda. I wouldn't pay 30 grand for a base model. Did you guys see the 0-60 for the 1.5 is 8.5 seconds? That barely beats a Prius.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:44 AM
  #635  
Chilicharger665's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,694
Total Cats: 67
From: SE NM
Default

I want to know what is different about the 2.0 in the ND from the 3. I don't know if the 7500 redline mentioned in the reviews is also for the 2.0, but with the power rating not changing, it must be a straight drop-in, with the only changes being to fit it longitudinally.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 10:23 AM
  #636  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

The torque curve I've seen for the 3's SkyActive tune is falling off a cliff by 6K. I just don't see how that tune is appropriate for a Miata. It also means that a whole bunch of power should be available with some attention paid to high-RPM breathing. The low-end grunt from the SkyActive should be eye-opening compared to previous Miata engines.

BTW, I love how everyone still calls it a Miata almost 10 years after Mazda tried to kill that name. They should embrace it.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:25 PM
  #637  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

The 2.0L in the Miata is confirmed to have a different intake, exhaust, and head.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 02:55 PM
  #638  
asmasm's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
From: durham NC
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
The 2.0L in the Miata is confirmed to have a different intake, exhaust, and head.
Which is what makes the hp/torque figures so confusing.
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 02:55 PM
  #639  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Chilicharger665
This is retarded and a complete waste. If that guy who got the HP right those months ago also got the price right then fuuuuuccckk Mazda. I wouldn't pay 30 grand for a base model. Did you guys see the 0-60 for the 1.5 is 8.5 seconds? That barely beats a Prius.
If you live in the US, the 1.5 is irrelevant, it's not coming here.

I suspect the "specially tuned for the Miata" stuff applies to the 1.5, because it's ~ 20 hp up on the 1.5 used in other Mazdas, whereas the 2.0 specs are the same as the one in the Mazda3. Perhaps they spent the currently available budget on the 1.5 and will be cranking out an improved 2.0 in a subsequent year?

As for price, it hasn't really changed. It's called inflation.

--Ian
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 05:15 PM
  #640  
TalkingPie's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 277
Total Cats: 58
From: Montreal, QC
Default

Road & Track First Drive

From the article, it sounds like the car should be spectacular. I've been reading Jack Baruth for years, and he's normally a no BS kind of writer. As a racing instructor, as well as having raced in the Skip Barber Miata series, I'd like to believe that if he says the car drives well, it does.

More power would be nice, though.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM.