Notices
General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 11:02 PM
  #521  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Come on guys, if I wanted to read people bickering about stupid off-topic **** I'd read the m.net thread.
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 12:15 AM
  #522  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 12:26 AM
  #523  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Come on guys, if I wanted to read people bickering about stupid off-topic **** I'd read the m.net thread.
But we're not bickering. We're making smart *** comments and entertaining ourselves given the lack of real ND news. That's the mt way.

Originally Posted by cordycord
Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
Much more expensive petrol (apparently, they don't have gasoline).

More powerful Green political movement.

Punitive taxes on engine sizes that exceed 1.6L.

Other than that . . . .
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 12:33 AM
  #524  
DeerHunter's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,061
Total Cats: 2,325
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Monk
Just when we think Americans have no knowledge of or interest in what goes on north of their border...

Originally Posted by hornetball
But we're not bickering. We're making smart *** comments and entertaining ourselves given the lack of real ND news. That's the mt way.
What he said.
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 01:13 AM
  #525  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by yenadar
I took a dyno chart from a 155hp/150tq 2.0L SkyActive engine, converted it to Excel, and then manual played with the torque curve to shift it 600rpm higher in the rev range. I did this because a higher redline really suggests that Mazda would use more appropriately tuned intake and exhaust dimensions to support that extra RPM, and possibly cam differences.

It produces a pretty compelling number at ~154whp, which is about 170hp at the crank with the Mazda3's drivetrain losses. The ND's losses will be higher due to RWD vs FWD, driveshaft and all, but it should still make at least the 167hp mark of the NC if the 600rpm northward torque shift is anywhere close to accurate. If I underestimate the torque curve shift, it could easily climb up another 5-10hp.

My issue is that while the NA/NB engines are basically Briggs & Stratton technology, that's what we love about them; they can actually be tweaked and updated. I've worked on MZR direct injection engines and it ain't the same animal. The SkyActiv architecture is commendable--especially since they've decided to buck the "one size fits most" strategy of the rest of the industry. But I wonder how the car will react to pistons that don't have that funky divot in the middle, or if DIYAutotune/AEM et al will be able to offer a real product for a direct injection engine. Will it all go back to piggyback systems?
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 05:22 AM
  #526  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Will it all go back to piggyback systems?
Hopefully EcuTec or similar will support it in the end, but it will most probably not be as wild as the opportunities on the Brigg&Pratton.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 12:26 PM
  #527  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Someone on mnet is claiming to have been in a focus group session:

I just came back from automotive survey featuring 2 ND miatas, one with soft top right hand drive like the one we saw in Monterey. One with targa/power retractable hardtop concept. They are being comparing against Audi TT, BMW Z4, Toyota FRS and Mini copper convertible.

The final number for miata is 155hp with 148ft/lbs and 2300lbs for soft top and 2400lbs for retractable hardtop concept. Retractable hard top / targa has panorama roof like the SLK.

The interior of the new ND feel smaller than my current NC. The door is higher or the seat is lower than current NC. Six speed manual is standard with keyless start stop. Navigation is on the Japanese model but doesn't know if American model have the navigation option. The navigation display is the Same as the new Mazda 3.

Soft top starting price in 30,495 and retractable hardtop/targa is 32,985
The 155hp, 30.5k sticker, and the fact that it was posted at 1:30am Pacific makes me thing that someone just got drunk and was ******* around, but who knows?
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #528  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

If base price is over $30k it'll probably be DOA. It'll sell in S2k numbers at most.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #529  
asmasm's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
From: durham NC
Default

Yikes. People compare hp and price when they shop for cars. 155hp at 30k sounds awful.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 12:32 PM
  #530  
Stealth97's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 67
From: Canton, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by asmasm
Yikes. People compare hp and price when they shop for cars. 155hp at 30k sounds awful.
More than double your hp at the same price with a mustang.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 12:45 PM
  #531  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

I'm taking it with a grain of salt because it's a random dude off of mnet that isn't Mark Booth.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #532  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

If the above is to be believed

ND ~ 155hp/148ft-lbs ~ 2300lbs ~ $30,000

And they are comparing it to...

Cooper S Convertible ~ 181hp/177ft-lbs ~2800lbs ~ $28,700
BMW Z4 sDrive28i ~240hp/260ft-lbs ~3300lbs~ $48,950
Scion FRS ~ 200hp/151ft-lbs ~ 2758lbs ~ $25,470
Audi TT ~ 211hp/258ft-lbs ~ 3340lbs ~ $43,350

(These are "starting at" MSRP prices and specs from the manufacturers websites for current models, so I assume 2015 at this point in the year)

I did some meaningless quickie back of the napkin calculations...

Dollars per HP:
ND - $193.5/hp
CS - $158.6/hp
Z4 - $203.9/hp
FRS - $127.3/hp
TT - $205.4/hp

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
ND - 0.067
CS - 0.065
Z4 - 0.073
FRS - 0.073
TT - 0.063

Then Mazda has a LOT of work to do
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 02:15 PM
  #533  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Dollars per HP:
ND - $193.5/hp
CS - $158.6/hp
Z4 - $203.9/hp
FRS - $127.3/hp
TT - $205.4/hp

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
ND - 0.067
CS - 0.065
Z4 - 0.073
FRS - 0.073
TT - 0.063

Then Mazda has a LOT of work to do
2015 Mustang GT

Dollars per HP:
$73.56

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
0.117

Not an apples to apples comparison between these sports cars and and a heavy american sports coupe, but even still, for $32k you can have a 435 hp V8.
$30k is not a Miata price. **** is nuts.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 04:04 PM
  #534  
Filipe Dias's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 116
Total Cats: 26
From: Portugal
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
The fact that our tax over the car price is based primarily on the displacement of the engine and CO2
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 05:38 PM
  #535  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Filipe Dias
The fact that our tax over the car price is based primarily on the displacement of the engine and CO2
Boy, that type of regulation would seem to take all the fun out of driving...or at least make it really expensive. Yep, I sure hope it doesn't catch on here.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 06:02 PM
  #536  
Lokiel's Avatar
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,036
Total Cats: 266
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Boy, that type of regulation would seem to take all the fun out of driving...or at least make it really expensive. Yep, I sure hope it doesn't catch on here.
In the land of "There's no substitute for cubic inches!" I doubt that will ever happen.

Unfortunately Australia has traditionally preferred larger torquey engines but we're slowly moving towards smaller engine cars due to the fact that petrol is about 3-4x more expensive than in the US. Weirdly though, 4WDs are becoming extremely popular family cars?
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 08:24 PM
  #537  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Lokiel
In the land of "There's no substitute for cubic inches!" I doubt that will ever happen.

Unfortunately Australia has traditionally preferred larger torquey engines but we're slowly moving towards smaller engine cars due to the fact that petrol is about 3-4x more expensive than in the US. Weirdly though, 4WDs are becoming extremely popular family cars?
3x-4x more expensive?! Crap! The kind of policies that would create expensive gasoline would really hurt low and middle income families here; the dreaded 1 percenters wouldn't have a bad time...but they don't buy Miatas.

I suppose the shaky auto industry in Detroit would really be hurt as well (big cubes and all), even if most of it is now owned by the Italians...
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 08:58 PM
  #538  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
3x-4x more expensive?! Crap!
Crap indeed. I'd like to discuss an exciting bridge-buying opportunity with you.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 09:01 PM
  #539  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Crap indeed. I'd like to discuss an exciting bridge-buying opportunity with you.
Bridge? Who cares about a bridge when we have HIGH SPEED RAIL DUDE!!!! Yes, three times the cost and half the estimated passengers and speed, but I TRUST THE GOVERNMENT! Don't you?
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 09:52 PM
  #540  
cordycord's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,400
Total Cats: 560
From: SoCal
Default

Like it or not....agree with it or not...government regulations have a direct correlation to what we end up driving. It's not that I advocate bringing back unrestricted two stroke engines for cars, but this stupid government crap does have a bearing on what type of engine will end up in the ND.

By the negative props being given out, apparently some people don't want to even admit this. And they certainly don't want opposing viewpoints.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:52 PM.