Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Insert BS here (https://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-here-4/)
-   -   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI (https://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-here-4/want-do-not-want-subaru-brz-sti-61703/)

JasonC SBB 12-10-2011 07:29 PM

-3 or more.

Efini~FC3S 12-12-2011 09:48 AM

So how much static camber does it take to make a macstrut car work well on a track?

Oscar 12-12-2011 09:59 AM

All of it.

JasonC SBB 12-12-2011 11:20 AM

Depends on how much body roll you get - how soft the suspension is and how sticky the tires are. I've seen reports of M3's on stock suspensions on sticky street tires benefit from -3*, and likewise for stiff suspensions on autox Hoosiers.

Splitime 12-12-2011 01:08 PM

-3 is nothing, assuming you don't have crazy toe settings.

I wouldn't worry about abnormal wear if toe is 0.

Scrappy Jack 12-12-2011 02:51 PM

If it hasn't been posted yet, the GReddy Scion FR-S was out at a Cars & Coffee in California. Note the scale relative to the old AE86...

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7001/6...e8fc1509_b.jpg

mgeoffriau 12-12-2011 04:05 PM

I'm actually a little surprised that it's as heavy as it is, for being so small. A Celica GT-S weighs 2500 lbs. I know the FF packaging helps with weight compared to a FR, but still -- I'm very interested in the car, but not as interested as I'd be if they'd kept it under 2500 lbs.

JasonC SBB 12-12-2011 04:27 PM


Originally Posted by Splitime (Post 805304)
-3 is nothing, assuming you don't have crazy toe settings.

I wouldn't worry about abnormal wear if toe is 0.

When driving on the street I get inside front wear with 1/32" toe in per side, and -2.2* camber.

Scrappy Jack 12-12-2011 04:49 PM


Originally Posted by mgeoffriau (Post 805397)
I'm actually a little surprised that it's as heavy as it is, for being so small. A Celica GT-S weighs 2500 lbs. I know the FF packaging helps with weight compared to a FR, but still -- I'm very interested in the car, but not as interested as I'd be if they'd kept it under 2500 lbs.

I am still amazed that the Celica was as light as it was. Still, with significantly more weight (taking the broad mid-point of 2750 lbs for the Scion) but a little more power, the FR-S ends up with comparable or slightly better weight-to-BHP and weight-to-TQ ratios. 13.75 vs 13.89 lbs/BHP and 18.33 vs 19.23 lbs/TQ for the FR-S and Celica GT-S, respectively.

Dimensionally, it is actually a couple of inches shorter, about an inch wider and about the same height as a 2005 GT-S from what I have seen reported.


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 805410)
When driving on the street I get inside front wear with 1/32" toe in per side, and -2.2* camber.

Corner harder? :D

JasonC SBB 12-12-2011 06:23 PM

My car sees a lot of mountain roads. The front insides are eaten during hard braking.

gearhead_318 12-12-2011 08:32 PM


Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack (Post 805353)
If it hasn't been posted yet, the GReddy Scion FR-S was out at a Cars & Coffee in California. Note the scale relative to the old AE86...

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7001/6...e8fc1509_b.jpg

That looks seriously good, do want.

viperormiata 12-12-2011 08:38 PM

I think everyone in this thread needs to get their eyes checked. This car is hideous.

9671111 12-13-2011 01:07 AM

*

18psi 12-13-2011 01:20 AM

the more I look at these things the more I like them.

Seefo 12-13-2011 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by rccote (Post 805594)
Really not a fan of the roundness in the lights. Doesn't flow well with the lines at all imo.

needs more this:

pic
pic


+1. That's what I have been saying all along. Those roundy lights don't work at all with the lines and it kills it for me (visually).

JasonC SBB 12-13-2011 11:54 AM

Anyone else think that today's Japanese cars look more and more like anime fighting robots?

Scrappy Jack 12-13-2011 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by JasonC SBB (Post 805722)
Anyone else think that today's Japanese cars look more and more like anime fighting robots?

I think the current Camaro looks more like a fighting robot.




See what I did there?

JasonC SBB 12-13-2011 12:59 PM

You are talking about *American* fighting robots. :)

gearhead_318 03-24-2012 12:00 AM



Distill the comprehensive goodness of the 2013 Subaru BRZ down to a single desirable property and it is this: Profound control.

It is the rear-drive BRZ's competence in those pivotal split seconds as the limit of grip approaches and departs that gives it undeniably enticing character. Few cars in recent memory do it so well and those that do typically cost at least twice as much. Think Lotus Exige/Elise or Porsche 911 GT3. In other words, the BRZ offers a level of engagement that, until now, has been either too costly or too impractical for the average enthusiast.

That will change with the introduction of the BRZ to the U.S. First, with an estimated price in the mid-$20,000 range, it's not costly. Second, it's practical enough to be driven daily. And, finally, it fills a niche in the U.S. market that has remained conspicuously vacant for years.

Filling the Niche
It's not just the BRZ's communication and control that's alluring, however. Its approachable limits are what make it a wholly engaging sports car. Go on the attack in a BRZ and you're not flirting with a $120,000 disaster. What's more, it's most rewarding at modest speeds found in 2nd and 3rd gear. In this regard it pulls from the same well of level-headed appeal that makes Mazda's MX-5 Miata so fun. But being a softly sprung convertible has always compromised the Miata's abilities and limited its appeal for those seeking a dedicated driver's car.

The BRZ's singularity of purpose doesn't come with the same space and structure compromises found in the Miata, either. Its trunk is big enough to handle more than just weekend trips, its structure makes no concessions to top-droppers and its suspension tuning strikes a perfect balance between date nights and track days.

Focus, Focus, Focus
In addition to its mid-speed capability, the BRZ encourages full-attack driving on unfamiliar roads well into triple digits. Its brakes don't fade, its gearbox doesn't balk and its chassis remains composed even when the road surface isn't. We hammered it for hours over rough roads with little regard for the hardware and never once bottomed the suspension or had a moment that made us reconsider our speed.

Steering, which is electrically assisted in a rapid 13.1:1 ratio, is immensely feelsome and exact, imparting the front tires' grip status precisely to its driver's brain stem. It is perhaps the best electric steering in any car, except, possibly, Mazda's nearly extinct RX-8.

Brake response, too, is immediate and confident. Thirty minutes driving well past rational limits did damp the middle pedal's hair-trigger response, but we never lost confidence in the pedal. Ironically, the BRZ's tires, which are the same used as in the Plus Performance Package on a Toyota Prius, seemed entirely able, exhibiting only insignificant wear after a full day of back-road insanity.

Like It Should Be, Mostly
The 2013 Subaru BRZ's five stability control modes — three too many, if you ask us — are needlessly complex. So much so, in fact, that even Subaru insiders struggle to adequately explain the purpose for so many choices. There's a "Sport" mode which will loosen the electronic reins enough to allow you to have fun while still metering out protection if needed. Fortunately, fully disabling the system is easy.

What's more, it's not really needed. Because it communicates so clearly, there's no sense of intimidation driving the BRZ to its limits. It's a textbook example of predictable rear-drive behavior, which is rewarding for both the advanced and novice driver alike.
Ignoring the BRZ's entirely modest arrangement of parts, the car is a stunning experience. Considering them, it's a machine you need to drive in its element to fully appreciate. When it comes to purity of purpose, you'll be hard-pressed to find a car that delivers this much speed and involvement under $50,000 — Mitsubishi's Evo X being one possible exception. Repeat this kind of driving in an Evo, though, and you'll be buying tires and brake pads at double this rate.

Not About the Numbers
If you're the kind of enthusiast whose car must be able to hammer down freeway on-ramps with its tires ablaze, the BRZ isn't your car.

At 7.3 seconds, its 0-60 time (7.0 seconds using a 1-foot rollout like on a drag strip) isn't going to win over many drag racers. But this time comes with an explanation. The rev limiter in 2nd gear kicks in at 59.2 mph, requiring a second shift to achieve the milestone and slowing the time considerably. The quarter-mile passes in 15.3 seconds at 92.1 mph. Judge the BRZ on its acceleration alone and you'll be disappointed. But it should surprise exactly no one that 200 horsepower pushing around 2,734 pounds isn't going to thrill John Force.

But you're not John Force, are you? Neither are we, which is why we realize that the BRZ's respectable 69.1-mph slalom speed and striking 0.92g on the skid pad are more definitive of its character than is its acceleration. Those numbers are better than both the 2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe (67.4 mph slalom, 0.89g skid pad) and the 2011 Ford Mustang GT (67.3 mph slalom, 0.91g skid pad).

Braking, too, is solid. The BRZ required 114 feet to stop from 60 and it did so consistently with a firm, confident pedal. The Genesis Coupe needed 116 feet to make it happen and the Mustang got the job done in only 109 feet.

What You Get
By now you know that the 2013 Subaru BRZ's 2.0-liter flat-4 combines port and direct fuel injection to produce the aforementioned 200 hp and 151 pound-feet of torque. A six-speed manual transmission is standard equipment and a six-speed automatic — perhaps the only one ever well suited to this kind of car — is optional and will cost about $1,200 if it follows traditional Subaru pricing strategies. Shift paddles offer full control over the gearbox and downshifts are perfectly rev-matched.

There are few distractions from the BRZ's driver focus inside, where the finish is spartan but not cheap. A center-mounted tachometer consumes most of the instrument panel real estate. To its left is a conventional speedometer, which is duplicated in digital form inside the tachometer itself. The cloth seats are comfortable and supportive enough for hard driving, while the steering wheel is small, thick and wrapped in leather.

Navigation, Bluetooth and a USB port are standard on Premium trim levels. Throw in the extra $2,000 or so for a Limited model and you'll get synthetic suede and leather seats, seat heaters, dual-zone climate control, keyless entry and start and a few other features — like a spoiler.

Refreshing
Subaru plans to sell 500 cars monthly in the U.S. beginning April 20. Exact pricing won't be announced for several weeks, but a Scion FR-S, which lacks the 2013 Subaru BRZ's navigation system will sticker at $24,930 including delivery. A base WRX sedan — which also lacks navigation, but comes with a turbo, all-wheel drive and four doors — can be had for $26,345 (including destination). The BRZ is considerably smaller and simpler than a WRX so we're putting our money on a base price with destination around $26,000.

Then consider the fact that Subaru's BRZ lacks adjustable dampers, throttle and steering calibrations. It has no complex electronic means of torque delivery and it can't be had with a sunroof or — mercifully — as a convertible. It is simple, relatively uncomplicated and wholly uncompromised. Despite this, it is one of the most rewarding cars we've ever driven.

Perhaps there's a lesson here. If this is all that's required to make a sports car with elegant control, engaging feedback and enlightening limits, we have only one question:

Why isn't every manufacturer doing it?

The manufacturer provided Edmunds this vehicle for the purposes of evaluation.
- http://www.insideline.com/subaru/brz...and-video.html

Shifting @ 59 mph, sound like anyone you know?
It gets 25 city 34 highway with the auto (gay) and 22 city 30 highway with the manual (win) on premium gas.

Faeflora 03-24-2012 12:18 AM

Dang. I want.

But sounds like turbocharging will be difficult?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands