Yeap, blasphemy inside.
#22
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
I'm not out there to set big numbers, just going to have some fun with this while I have it. I'm pretty sure my dad will buy them from me, he's all into the old school ITB thing, heh.
#23
The thing about irtb's is that you eliminate the stopage in the intake tract considerably. But you still have a cork keeping you from going anywhere. The stock cam and ecu is the cork. At least I did not have a stock ecu slowing me down. I probably got less than 150 horsepower with ported 95 head and carbs, but when I put a cam in it, the other mods reached it's potential.
#26
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Keith picked up 7rwhp with his Fujiracing ITB setup on his Targa's 2.0L High CR motor...
and only after a bit of tuning...
http://www.targamiata.com/images_lrg/targa%20IRTB.pdf
and only after a bit of tuning...
http://www.targamiata.com/images_lrg/targa%20IRTB.pdf
#30
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
All the top level CSP guys don't use ITBs, because like they said above if its good to ~250hp then it should ok below that.
Its a 01 block son! lol
The exintake cam swap would help, it seemed to help on N3V's car anyways.
I'd be happy to see 135rwhp on an mustang, but that might be too optimistic.
The exintake cam swap would help, it seemed to help on N3V's car anyways.
I'd be happy to see 135rwhp on an mustang, but that might be too optimistic.
#33
Despite the ebonics, I was being sorta serious. If I was doing a build for that sort of thing I would have a good valve train and rev the **** out of it. You have virtually 0 intake restriction, and thats the way to use it.
Thing is, you would want pretty nasty cams to get any benefit up there too. And I have no idea how stock rods, specifically their caps and fasteners, will do at high rpm. Tensile forces from high rpm will kill a rod just as fast if not faster than compresive forces.
Thing is, you would want pretty nasty cams to get any benefit up there too. And I have no idea how stock rods, specifically their caps and fasteners, will do at high rpm. Tensile forces from high rpm will kill a rod just as fast if not faster than compresive forces.
#34
Despite the ebonics, I was being sorta serious. If I was doing a build for that sort of thing I would have a good valve train and rev the **** out of it. You have virtually 0 intake restriction, and thats the way to use it.
Thing is, you would want pretty nasty cams to get any benefit up there too. And I have no idea how stock rods, specifically their caps and fasteners, will do at high rpm. Tensile forces from high rpm will kill a rod just as fast if not faster than compresive forces.
Thing is, you would want pretty nasty cams to get any benefit up there too. And I have no idea how stock rods, specifically their caps and fasteners, will do at high rpm. Tensile forces from high rpm will kill a rod just as fast if not faster than compresive forces.
I turn my stock rodded motor to 7800 rpm, albiet not at road racing conditions.
#35
Keith picked up 7rwhp with his Fujiracing ITB setup on his Targa's 2.0L High CR motor...
and only after a bit of tuning...
http://www.targamiata.com/images_lrg/targa%20IRTB.pdf
and only after a bit of tuning...
http://www.targamiata.com/images_lrg/targa%20IRTB.pdf
#36
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Statesville, NC
Posts: 2,738
Total Cats: 319
Jimmy's car had stock rods, end-caps, and not sure on the fasteners. I know he rev'd it out to 8k a lot on the track. Evenually they gave out and now he's going rotary.
This thread has been very motivational to get a turbo back in my car, thank you!
This thread has been very motivational to get a turbo back in my car, thank you!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post