Good AFR target table?

hosting images
Most of it still DIYautotunes map expect for some slow areas and around 7psi > above 5k rpms
This was the last one i took with the .msg it was logging. The .msq i posted previously is after running ve analyze live. Ve analyze constantly wants to make alot of changes. The car runs pretty darn good. Driveabilty is fantastic.
Thank you all for you looking.
Thank you all for you looking.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
I found that overall PW was shorter if I went fatter in the cruise cells from 16:1 to 15.4 on my 1994 daily. This was done with an inclinometer on my phone, cruise control, EGO correction, and adjusting spark.
Thanks, I'll take a screen shot when I get home...theres probably only 5-7 rows and 5-7 columns which is tiny compared to the charts I'm seeing on the forum
and I can't figure out how to switch it from lambda to AFR, went into project properties and tried a few other things FFFUUUUU
and I can't figure out how to switch it from lambda to AFR, went into project properties and tried a few other things FFFUUUUU
FYI: If hustler posts his table it is for a low comp motor.
you dont need a larger afr targets table. just set it up well, you have interpolatation, so you can techincally use just 2 rows for boost.
for example you can have the top row 130kPa as 11.8 across, and the second row down as 100kPa and 14.5 across. You now have 4 rows to fine tune the cruise areas.
for example you can have the top row 130kPa as 11.8 across, and the second row down as 100kPa and 14.5 across. You now have 4 rows to fine tune the cruise areas.
Why not have 100 for the top row and turn off EGO correction above that? This way you have 6 rows for AFR targets in cruise. I don't remember anyone on MS1 that used EGO correction in boost.








