Gearbox options/experiences
Quaife wide 2nd through 5th looks very close to 3rd through 6th on the stock 6 speed and 1st is a little taller than mid-way between 1st and second on the stock 6 speed. This is Excellent track gearing! Totally useless on the track if you select the proper rear end gear it for autocross in my opinion.
Maybe I just need two rear ends and add rear carrier swap that to my growing list of swap parts to run both disciplines with the same car. Add another couple grand to the cost of using a Quaife.
That's almost Identical 2nd gear to a stock 5 speed with a 3.909. my car bogged a lot out of slow autocross corners with that gear which in turn prompted a lot of initial over application of throttle pedal followed shortly thereafter by too much wheel spin and the feeling you were going to lose control and crash when the power comes on. With my current gearing it never bogs in second if the car is rolling at all. Power response to pedal movement stays fairly instant and linear.
I'm thinking maybe another 5mph worth of gear at the top of second than what I have might be good 10 is definitely too much for my power delivery to stay in the sweet spot.
I'm thinking maybe another 5mph worth of gear at the top of second than what I have might be good 10 is definitely too much for my power delivery to stay in the sweet spot.
I could get on board with it, the rating and that there have been failures worry me. I would have a conniption fit if it broke after all that because then it would have made more sense to go all in on a $8k custom whatever else we're looking at.
In my case a tko600 with a .82 5th was brought to my attention and wouldn't be the worst thing in the world though there's a lot of fabrication involved compared to what I want to do (none), but zero worries about power.
In my case a tko600 with a .82 5th was brought to my attention and wouldn't be the worst thing in the world though there's a lot of fabrication involved compared to what I want to do (none), but zero worries about power.
That's almost Identical 2nd gear to a stock 5 speed with a 3.909. my car bogged a lot out of slow autocross corners with that gear which in turn prompted a lot of initial over application of throttle pedal followed shortly thereafter by too much wheel spin and the feeling you were going to lose control and crash when the power comes on. With my current gearing it never bogs in second if the car is rolling at all. Power response to pedal movement stays fairly instant and linear.
I'm thinking maybe another 5mph worth of gear at the top of second than what I have might be good 10 is definitely too much for my power delivery to stay in the sweet spot.
I'm thinking maybe another 5mph worth of gear at the top of second than what I have might be good 10 is definitely too much for my power delivery to stay in the sweet spot.
Sure but I don't think the Quaife is taking 500ft/lbs very well, this other one is designed for it. Not that I'm going to make that.
I make 200 ft-lbs at 3100 rpm but Over 300 by 4200 rpm till about 7200 where it slowly tapers down. Car is substantially faster if it stays above 4000 rpm off slow corners and much easier to drive staying away from transitioning through the rapid torque rise part of the curve.
With my power curve I have become a gearing snob. I'd hate to spend a shitload of money and have my car be slower.
They have different gearing requirements than us. We want a 7.74 total gear reduction, they want 7.04ish. Thats the difference between having a 8500rpm redline and a 7500 rpm redline with matching powerbands for both.
I would not keep it a secret. We're building a 350whp track car that could certainly use such a trans so my interest is very specific now.
__________________
Thanks for taking this on








