Notices
Aerodynamics Splitters, spoilers, and all the aero advice you can handle.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Post your DIY aero pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #261  
lightyear's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 515
Total Cats: 93
From: melbourne aus
Default

I have a pic under heavy braking going down a hill. I will see how high it is. My splitter sticks out from the bumper about 3". I don't know what spring rates I have. The coil overs are a cheap set of street b.c coil overs (gold) with whatever spring rates they come with. I payed $600 for them 2nd hand.
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 02:28 AM
  #262  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

lol @ using a craftsman deep socket as a measurement unit.

-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 01:12 PM
  #263  
jacob300zx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,211
Total Cats: 151
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by v01canic
What are your thoughts between these two splitters/airdams












Car one is the far superior design. The easiest way to think of aero for me is to imagine the particular part your building being placed in running water ie like a creek. Now your job is to channel that water so it has the least resistance. I know that sounds silly but others have to have their brain wired like mine lol
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 09:03 AM
  #264  
Shahab's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Total Cats: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by jacob300zx
Car one is the far superior design.
Superior for what? The second design will likely create more downforce as it looks to have a greater surface area for the splitter. If that is your goal.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #265  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Well car 1's design is similar to Crusher. Too bad that car is really slow and never wins any races.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 09:43 AM
  #266  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Rear main fail:
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 10:12 AM
  #267  
jacob300zx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,211
Total Cats: 151
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Shahab
Superior for what? The second design will likely create more downforce as it looks to have a greater surface area for the splitter. If that is your goal.

Car one with the apocalypseTM front end has a more effect means of evacuating the air above the splitter, has less drag, and creates less turbulent air for heat exchangers and brake ducting. Both designs have been tested here in Texas up to 150ish mph. Design one on the same car with no other changes has to run a lot smaller splitter to keep the balance the same. The goal is really to create negative lift on the front end which translates to more downforce, the stock miata bumper is a great design on the top 4"

Here is version 1 that we built in the winter of 2010 for JohnZ's car (spoolin2bars)
http://www.speedhunters.com/2011/03/...w_track_miata/

JohnR, ZXTEX car one, took it forward and used a better material and covered the front tires better with out canards. I have several improvments in my head but need a fresh junk bumper and some free time. Spoolin also needs more rear aero before we improve on the front design. Look how small the splitters are on both the straight down designs, they are more effective period.

Last edited by jacob300zx; Dec 12, 2012 at 11:03 AM.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #268  
Shahab's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Total Cats: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by jacob300zx
Car one with the apocalypseTM front end has a more effect means of evacuating the air above the splitter, has less drag, and creates less turbulent air for heat exchangers and brake ducting. Both designs have been tested here in Texas up to 150ish mph. Design one on the same car with no other changes has to run a lot smaller splitter to keep the balance the same. The goal is really to create negative lift on the front end which translates to more downforce, the stock miata bumper is a great design on the top 4"

Here is version 1 that we built in the winter of 2010 for JohnZ's car (spoolin2bars)
CAR SPOTLIGHT>> HOMEBREW TRACK MIATA - Speedhunters

JohnR, ZXTEX car one, took it forward and used a better material and covered the front tires better with out canards. I have several improvments in my head but need a fresh junk bumper and some free time. Spoolin also needs more rear aero before we improve on the front design. Look how small the splitters are on both the straight down designs, they are more effective period.
I agree with you mostly. I think it would be interesting to quantify the differences via CFD.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #269  
jacob300zx's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,211
Total Cats: 151
From: Houston, TX
Default

Look at spoolin2bars birch splitter we made in the post below, it was like a 6" splitter. No other changes but added the apocalypse front end and the splitter had to be trimmed down to 2" to keep the balance the same. I believe ZXTEX had the same experience as us on splitter length once you go to the flat front end.

https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep...r-52759/page4/

I also believe spoolin picked up some mph on several straight's here on local tracks.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 12:56 PM
  #270  
Shahab's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 79
Total Cats: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by jacob300zx
Look at spoolin2bars birch splitter we made in the post below, it was like a 6" splitter. No other changes but added the apocalypse front end and the splitter had to be trimmed down to 2" to keep the balance the same. I believe ZXTEX had the same experience as us on splitter length once you go to the flat front end.

https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep...r-52759/page4/

I also believe spoolin picked up some mph on several straight's here on local tracks.
I'd like to see what a large front splitter with a flat front air dam would do. Judging from your experience and others you've referenced it would unnecessarily shift the aero balance forward.
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #271  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

There is some interesting stuff in that thread. Like the structural adhesive tape idea.
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #272  
Thumper13's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

I'll be running a front air dam and splitter but I'll be going topless. What is the best way to balance out the effects of the front splitter to get rear downforce ? The car will be PT/IT/TT
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 12:36 AM
  #273  
plucas's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 74
Total Cats: 45
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by v01canic
What are your thoughts between these two splitters/airdams
Depends what your goals are. Personally I think air dams and/or splitters should be used to correct aerodynamic balance after adjusting or changing a rear wing (assuming a diffuser that works is already on the vehicle). The correcting of aerodynamic balance will also add downforce. Also, a decrease in drag can usually be gained by the addition of either a splitter or air dam.

I have simulated both of these types of setups in cfd. If interested, check it out.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/105015076/a...ata_122612.pdf
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 01:15 AM
  #274  
Thumper13's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by plucas
Depends what your goals are. Personally I think air dams and/or splitters should be used to correct aerodynamic balance after adjusting or changing a rear wing (assuming a diffuser that works is already on the vehicle). The correcting of aerodynamic balance will also add downforce. Also, a decrease in drag can usually be gained by the addition of either a splitter or air dam.

I have simulated both of these types of setups in cfd. If interested, check it out.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/105015076/a...ata_122612.pdf
Thanks for the response. I definitely need the front down force. I am running with NO hartop and I need a little help figuring the location of the rear wing to help balance out the front. With no top your model is not effective.I don't need to be spinning,chasing my tail due to lack of rear down force. Miatas need all the downforce they can get.
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 02:40 AM
  #275  
mr_hyde's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 798
Total Cats: 24
From: Seattle
Default

With no top, the air over the car is a swirling chaotic mess. It's a huge oversimplification, but your wing needs to be as high in the air as possible to have a chance at getting some clear air to cut. Fastback>hardtop>open top for aero.
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #276  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

From what I've heard, on the spoiler cars make more rear downforce running a tonneau cover compared to just a straight open top.
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 05:00 PM
  #277  
Thumper13's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mr_hyde
With no top, the air over the car is a swirling chaotic mess. It's a huge oversimplification, but your wing needs to be as high in the air as possible to have a chance at getting some clear air to cut. Fastback>hardtop>open top for aero.
I've been told the hardtop is worth 5 mph at 120 ??? dunno but I need the head space and the roll cage will not fit under the hardtop. I can go 6" ( maybe 8" ) above the front windshield height. I'm just looking for any help you guys might have to offer. Thanks
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #278  
v01canic's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -2
Default

Thought this deserved a spot in this thread


Originally Posted by ThePass
Great idea for a thread. I'll throw a few in here...

Canards/splitter extensions

Mock-up:


Done, awaiting paint:


Working:


Diffuser + Flat-bottom





Hood vent



Fender vent

Made from two separate fenders:



Rear Spoiler

(Oooold pic w/ auto-x angle)
Old Dec 27, 2012 | 08:24 PM
  #279  
Supe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 624
Total Cats: 81
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

I really like how he did those front fenders. Is there any more info on them in particular?
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 01:27 AM
  #280  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

What materials are people using for flat underbody's?

Im about to put a front end on an NA the same as the blue car with the big Hoosier sticker, and I have a diffuser to put on the back, I was considering just riveting aluminium angle to the pinch welds and screwing an alumalite panel to it with perhaps a few alluminium angle's running across it for stiffness, and of course the whole exhaust will need to be wrapped.

Is there a foolproof option that wont melt? 1/4 birch seems heavy for an entire undertray.

Dann



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 PM.