Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2020, 01:14 PM
  #20221  
Senior Member
 
Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 590
Total Cats: 113
Default

Simply trying to distinguish if "the masses" include dead voters, illegal ballots and switched votes. Stay tuned.
Stock is offline  
Old 12-08-2020, 05:28 PM
  #20222  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default


DNMakinson is offline  
Old 12-08-2020, 05:28 PM
  #20223  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,034
Total Cats: 6,598
Default


Joe Perez is online now  
Old 12-08-2020, 07:42 PM
  #20224  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Build a Bear game changer.



Braineack is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 09:36 AM
  #20225  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
I think Judge Judy would be a beast of a nomination for the Supreme Court. Could you imagine the Senate questioning her? I am pretty sure she would just stare them down, and no one would have the courage to ask her anything.
shuiend is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 09:45 AM
  #20226  
Senior Member
 
Bajingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Avl NC
Posts: 831
Total Cats: 193
Default

I'd be happy with judge Judy having actual power. She's pretty awesome.
Bajingo is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 10:31 AM
  #20227  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

That time you and you big tech buddies paid over $350 million to fix an election, but did a ****-poor job at it and the people/states are wising up:

https://blog.youtube/news-and-events...0-us-election/

Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come. As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context.
Safe Harbor deadline is not in the Constitution; only inauguration day. Bush v Gore, and a few others, went on longer than today's date.
Braineack is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 11:12 AM
  #20228  
Junior Member
 
RalliartRsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 22
Default

........So I guess it's cool then since the GA senate race is still up for grabs?? That ban ALSO applies to state, senate, etc races as well.....

Goose....gander....some other ****.

It's a private platform. They can do whatever the **** they please.
Don't like it?? Get bent and go use Christian Mingle or some ****.....

P.S I guess it's also cool to be onboard with clearly false information being spread across all sorts of platforms lol
RalliartRsX is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 01:15 PM
  #20229  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

why the ban on just election "misinformation"? Plenty of Flat-earthers, pro-communism, a boy = girl, science is fake, etc etc videos out there....
Braineack is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 01:52 PM
  #20230  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,034
Total Cats: 6,598
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
why the ban on just election "misinformation"?
?

Originally Posted by YouTube
YouTube doesn't allow content about COVID-19 that poses a serious risk of egregious harm.

YouTube doesn't allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities’ or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19. This is limited to content that contradicts WHO or local health authorities’ guidance on:
  • Treatment
  • Prevention
  • Diagnostic
  • Transmission
(...)

Examples

Here are some examples of content that’s not allowed on YouTube:
  • Denial that COVID-19 exists
  • Claims that people have not died from COVID-19
  • Claims that any vaccine is a guaranteed prevention method for COVID-19
  • Claims that a specific treatment or medicine is a guaranteed cure for COVID-19
  • Claims that certain people have immunity to COVID-19 due to their race or nationality
  • Encouraging taking home remedies instead of getting medical treatment when sick
  • Discouraging people from consulting a medical professional if they’re sick
  • Content that claims that holding your breath can be used as a diagnostic test for COVID-19
  • Videos alleging that if you avoid Asian food, you won’t get the coronavirus
  • Videos alleging that setting off fireworks can clean the air of the virus and will prevent the spread of the virus
  • Claims that COVID-19 is caused by radiation from 5G networks
  • Videos alleging that the COVID-19 test is the cause of the virus
  • Claims that countries with hot climates will not experience the spread of the virus
  • Videos alleging that social distancing and self-isolation are not effective in reducing the spread of the virus
  • Claims that the COVID-19 vaccine will kill people who receive it
  • Claims that the COVID-19 vaccine will be used as a means of population reduction
  • Videos claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine will contain fetal tissue
  • Claims that the flu vaccine causes contraction of COVID-19
  • Claims that the COVID-19 vaccine causes contraction of other infectious diseases or makes people more vulnerable to contraction of other infectious diseases
  • Claims that the COVID-19 vaccine will contain a microchip or tracking device

Source: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785


Joe Perez is online now  
Old 12-09-2020, 01:53 PM
  #20231  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,034
Total Cats: 6,598
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
why the ban on just election "misinformation"?
?

Originally Posted by YouTube
Hate speech is not allowed on YouTube. We remove content promoting violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on any of the following attributes:
  • Age
  • Caste
  • Disability
  • Ethnicity
  • Gender Identity and Expression
  • Nationality
  • Race
  • Immigration Status
  • Religion
  • Sex/Gender
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Victims of a major violent event and their kin
  • Veteran Status
Source: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 12-09-2020, 01:55 PM
  #20232  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,034
Total Cats: 6,598
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
why the ban on just election "misinformation"?
?

Originally Posted by YouTube
Content that threatens individuals is not allowed on YouTube. We also do not allow content that targets an individual with prolonged or malicious insults based on intrinsic attributes, including their protected group status or physical traits.

(...)

Examples

Here are some examples of content that’s not allowed on YouTube:
  • Repeatedly showing pictures of someone and then making statements like “Look at this creature’s teeth, they’re so disgusting!”, with similar commentary targeting intrinsic attributes throughout the video.
  • Targeting an individual based on their membership in a protected group, such as by saying: “Look at this filthy [slur targeting a protected group], I wish they’d just get hit by a truck.”
  • Targeting an individual and making claims they are involved in human trafficking in the context of a harmful conspiracy theory where the conspiracy is linked to direct threats or violent acts.
  • Using an extreme insult to dehumanize an individual based on their intrinsic attributes. For example: “Look at this dog of a woman! She’s not even a human being — she must be some sort of mutant or animal!”
  • Depicting an identifiable individual being murdered, seriously injured, or engaged in a graphic sexual act without their consent.
  • Accounts dedicated entirely to focusing on maliciously insulting an identifiable individual.
Source: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802268
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 12-09-2020, 02:10 PM
  #20233  
Junior Member
 
RalliartRsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 22
Default

Bush v Gore was a difference of a few hundred votes.

Biden v trump was difference of hundreds of thousands and over 5M difference in the popular vote in favor of Biden......

Apples to :insert completely unrelated scenario:

trump lost by a MUCH MUCH slimmer margin in 2016?? Fraud??

And I would like to hear about these "others" (elections which went on for much longer) that braineack speak about....
RalliartRsX is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 02:53 PM
  #20234  
Senior Member
 
poormxdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,204
Total Cats: 98
Default

Slightly off topic, but... had Gore taken his home state of Tennessee, Florida would not have mattered. In other words, the people that knew Gore and his family the best did not want him to be president. IMHO, it worked out as it should have.
poormxdad is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:04 PM
  #20235  
Junior Member
 
RalliartRsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 22
Default

Ding.

Did Gore even campaign in his home state?? It's funny as HRC made the exact same mistake in the rust belt states......
RalliartRsX is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:09 PM
  #20236  
Senior Member
 
poormxdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,204
Total Cats: 98
Default

Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
Ding.

Did Gore even campaign in his home state?? It's funny as HRC made the exact same mistake in the rust belt states......
Not sure how that is related. Are you saying he alienated his home state?

Back on topic. Read this. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...***-smell-test
poormxdad is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:17 PM
  #20237  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
Bush v Gore was a difference of a few hundred votes.

Biden v trump was difference of hundreds of thousands and over 5M difference in the popular vote in favor of Biden......

Apples to :insert completely unrelated scenario:

trump lost by a MUCH MUCH slimmer margin in 2016?? Fraud??
Size doesn't matter; you of all people should know that. You need to understand Federalism. The 13 states created the federal government. When they did this, they decided that representation in the federal government should assigned PER STATE, not per individual. This is why the concept of a nationwide popular vote is immaterial and stupid.

The union agreed to a manner in which our leaders our chosen.


What's even the point of an election if states don't follow the federal laws nor their own laws, and proceed to count votes in violation of said laws?

What's even the point of an election if you cannot challenge the legitimacy of the results, especially when you change the laws/rules on a whim without the legislature?

What's even the point of an election if you cannot confirm/verify/audit/adjudicate the results to ensure they were not in violation of the law?

It's pretty simple: Either the Constitution/law [be it state or U.S.] matters or it doesn't.Texas seems to think if one state has cheated in obtaining its representation in the federal government, that affects all other states.

And I would like to hear about these "others" (elections which went on for much longer) that braineack speak about...
google: contested presidential elections
Braineack is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:31 PM
  #20238  
Senior Member
 
Bajingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Avl NC
Posts: 831
Total Cats: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
It's pretty simple: Either the Constitution/law [be it state or U.S.] matters or it doesn't.Texas seems to think if one state has cheated in obtaining its representation in the federal government, that affects all other states
Did I miss something? Is Texas contesting the election now? That would be wonderful.
Bajingo is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:32 PM
  #20239  
Junior Member
 
RalliartRsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 278
Total Cats: 22
Default

Originally Posted by poormxdad
Not sure how that is related. Are you saying he alienated his home state?

Back on topic. Read this. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...***-smell-test
HRC made the assumption she had the rust belt states on lock becuz #Democrat

Gore made a similar assumption but to a greater extent becuz #Homestate

Key strategic mistakes by both candidates
RalliartRsX is offline  
Old 12-09-2020, 03:41 PM
  #20240  
Retired Mech Design Engr
iTrader: (3)
 
DNMakinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,009
Total Cats: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Size doesn't matter; you of all people should know that. You need to understand Federalism. The 13 states created the federal government. When they did this, they decided that representation in the federal government should assigned PER STATE, not per individual.…

It's pretty simple: Either the Constitution/law [be it state or U.S.] matters or it doesn't.Texas seems to think if one state has cheated in obtaining its representation in the federal government, that affects all other states.


google: contested presidential elections

NOTES FROM

The Federalist Papers

Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 22: The Same Subject Continued (Other Defects of the Present Confederation):

"The right of equal suffrage among the States is another exceptionable part of the Confederation. Every idea of proportion and every rule of fair representation conspire to condemn a principle, which gives to Rhode Island an equal weight in the scale of power with Massachusetts, or Connecticut, or New York; and to Delaware an equal voice in the national deliberations with Pennsylvania, or Virginia, or North Carolina. Its operation contradicts the fundamental maxim of republican government, which requires that the sense of the majority should prevail."

My comment:
In the end, Senators represented the States, House Members represented the population, and the president was kind of a mix.
Done with phone so may not be cut and pasted quite right.

Last edited by DNMakinson; 12-09-2020 at 06:18 PM. Reason: Clarity
DNMakinson is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.