When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why is it so controversial to suggest to have an election verified for accuracy?
Because it is possible that this might lead to a Trump victory, and bad orange man cannot be allowed to continue as President for a second term. The left has been quite clear and unambiguous on this point.
And here's a highlight from the footage where they pulled out (4) cases of fake ballots and were stuffing ballots, unobserved, after they sent home the watchers under false pretenses:
And here's a highlight from the footage where they pulled out (4) cases of fake ballots and were stuffing ballots, unobserved, after they sent home the watchers under false pretenses:
I feel as though we're having the same conversation over and over, using slightly different words each time.
The video, by definition, has to have been debunked. In order for it not to have been debunked, then there must exist the possibility that it is true. If that were the case, then there is a possibility that bad orange man might have, in fact, been the winner of the election, and therefore would serve a second term as President.
That cannot happen, as has been clearly and specifically stated by the left on many occasions. Therefore, the video must have been debunked.
It's almost as if by acting like his argument is simply satire and thinly veiled sarcasm he's able to pretend that his rhetoric isn't his own. Magnificent.
she all but confesses, but here we see her go back to work after ten days, asks for more work.
To those that do not understand what you are seeing here. There are 2 bins of what appear to be absentee ballots in certified envelopes that are BLANK. Now, let us assume that they are not blank, and that only the envelopes facing us are blank, but that the rest of the ballots are legit.....Even making that assumption, ballots are not supposed to be processed in any way at all without supervision. This is to ensure that no one can just fill out blank ballots and pick names off of voter rolls to assign to them.
In other words, there is zero legal reason for this woman to be in possession of this many absentee ballots period. Any processing by law requires independent watchers present to ensure fraud is not happening. The mere fact that she is going to be "working" with them IS THE ILLEGAL ACT.
This crime is not like a violent murder, you just witnessed the crime itself and that is the whole point you are missing.
Chain of custody is not followed here at all. Look at all the unsecured ballots all over the place in this video...she is pointing them all out for you.
Chain of custody laws were broken and that was done intentionally, and with malice, by the elections officials who arrogantly assumed everyone was in on it, but who were also filled with so much narcissism, that they felt the need to show what they were doing online to their friends and family.....What don't you folks understand about this process?
Do you understand that there are laws in place to protect the ballots for voter integrity purposes. Every bad vote allowed is a an honest vote taken away from an honest hard working tax paying citizen. These people showed us all that they simply do not care about our voices and opinions.
I also like to post photoshopped screen shots as legitimate.
Look at the time stamp and author; it was an obvious fake and supposed to be funny.
My original comment above the photo was "let's play a game: is this CNN headline real or fake" but I had assumed you guys were smart enough to figure it out for yourself and the impact of the headline just after my post above made it extra juicy...
But yes, it IS quite fun to post fake news stories hoping someone think it's real. The cunning or skillful act or scheme intended to deceive or outwit someone is what makes it fun!
But go ahead and continue to be an election fraud denier.
12-03-2020, 01:58 PM
1
