The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
tinfoil hat time.
https://twitter.com/WeThePeople2A76/status/1597889581420269569
https://twitter.com/WeThePeople2A76/status/1598001368882909184
looks like an inside job gone wrong, like the 1/6 pipebombs.
https://twitter.com/WeThePeople2A76/status/1597889581420269569
https://twitter.com/WeThePeople2A76/status/1598001368882909184
looks like an inside job gone wrong, like the 1/6 pipebombs.
So the vaccine is has is about as effective as placebos now?
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...placebo-effect
Image from my link.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...placebo-effect
Image from my link.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
So the vaccine is has is about as effective as placebos now?
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...placebo-effect
Image from my link.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...placebo-effect
Image from my link.
Now for bonus points: look up the min. efficacy rate to continue under the EUA.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
obey the common good.
The Indian government has argued before the Supreme Court of India that it is not liable for any injuries that may occur as a result of the Covid vaccine, according to its affidavit dated November 23.
This affidavit was submitted in response to a petition filed by the parents of two young women in India who tragically lost their lives after receiving the experimental Covid vaccine last year, according to Hindustan Times.
...
The Union of India in its reply affidavit dated 23.11.2022 filed before the Supreme Court in the case of Rachna Gangu Vs. Union of India Writ Petition (C) No. 1220 of 2021, had made following submissions:
In all the Government ads and in all appeals it was falsely informed to the public that the vaccines are completely safe.[P[b]ara 40 -43]
This affidavit was submitted in response to a petition filed by the parents of two young women in India who tragically lost their lives after receiving the experimental Covid vaccine last year, according to Hindustan Times.
...
The Union of India in its reply affidavit dated 23.11.2022 filed before the Supreme Court in the case of Rachna Gangu Vs. Union of India Writ Petition (C) No. 1220 of 2021, had made following submissions:
- Government never forced any citizen to get vaccines. There were no compulsion to citizen to get vaccinated. The vaccination program was completely voluntary. [[b]Paragraph 41]
- The Government on its website, Circular and also the PTI in its, press release had time to time informed the citizen about death causing and other side effects of Covishield vaccines. Therefore, any person taking vaccine has to verify said information and then to decide whether to get vaccines or not. Since vaccination was voluntary. [[b]Para 43]
- During vaccines development stage if any person suffers from any injury then the vaccine manufacturing company is bound to compensate the participant under Chapter VI of the NDCT Rules [[b]Para 46]
- At the vaccine administration stage, after marketing authorization has been obtained from the Government of India and the vaccine is available to the public, if a person suffers physical injury or death from an AEFI, appropriate remedies in law are open to the vaccine beneficiary or their family including approaching civil courts for a claim of damages/ compensation for negligence, malfeasance or misfeasance. Such claims may be determined on a case-to-case basis in an appropriate forum. [[b]Para 47]
In all the Government ads and in all appeals it was falsely informed to the public that the vaccines are completely safe.[P[b]ara 40 -43]
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
can't use gov't funds to help your pals in the gov't? hello loopholes!
https://www.theblaze.com/news/califo...medium=twitter
I'm going to take your money via taxation, then give you a pittance so you can give it BACK to me. Also, obey and vote democrat.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/califo...medium=twitter
Oakland, California, residents passed a measure to give all adult residents $100 in taxpayer-funded vouchers, called "Democracy Dollars," to donate to local political candidates every other year, the Daily Caller News Foundation reported.
The ballot measure, called the Fair Elections Act, was approved by nearly 74% of residents, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Every two years, residents 18 years and older will receive four $25 vouchers that can be donated to local political candidates running for mayor, City Council, or school board positions. All legal permanent adult residents, including non-U.S. citizens, will receive those vouchers, which will be paid for by the city's general funds.
The most recent draft of the act explains that the initiative aims to "curb corruption," encourage more public participation in local elections, and help finance candidates not funded by donors with significant wealth. Additionally, the program will prevent former city officials from becoming lobbyists.
Candidates hoping to receive residents' vouchers must first qualify for the program by raising a certain amount in contributions. For instance, a mayoral candidate must receive 400 contributions of at least $10 each. Certified candidates will also have to agree to spending caps.
Daniel Newman, cofounder and president of Maplight, the nonpartisan organization that supported Oakland's measure, told Fast Company, "We're seeking to help candidates run for office and win, who would be great elected officials but don't have access to wealth."
The ballot measure, called the Fair Elections Act, was approved by nearly 74% of residents, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Every two years, residents 18 years and older will receive four $25 vouchers that can be donated to local political candidates running for mayor, City Council, or school board positions. All legal permanent adult residents, including non-U.S. citizens, will receive those vouchers, which will be paid for by the city's general funds.
The most recent draft of the act explains that the initiative aims to "curb corruption," encourage more public participation in local elections, and help finance candidates not funded by donors with significant wealth. Additionally, the program will prevent former city officials from becoming lobbyists.
Candidates hoping to receive residents' vouchers must first qualify for the program by raising a certain amount in contributions. For instance, a mayoral candidate must receive 400 contributions of at least $10 each. Certified candidates will also have to agree to spending caps.
Daniel Newman, cofounder and president of Maplight, the nonpartisan organization that supported Oakland's measure, told Fast Company, "We're seeking to help candidates run for office and win, who would be great elected officials but don't have access to wealth."
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,660
Total Cats: 3,011
"If you look at the current rise in all-cause mortality, different states have very different rises in all-cause mortality than others," noted Catherine Austin Fitts.
"The only thing I've ever seen that would explain this is a quota system being enforced by a trade and credit embargo globally ... where every country or state is given a quota of how much they have to reduce their population."
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/...about-a-fraud/
"The only thing I've ever seen that would explain this is a quota system being enforced by a trade and credit embargo globally ... where every country or state is given a quota of how much they have to reduce their population."
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/...about-a-fraud/
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,038
Total Cats: 6,604
It's a scripted video, in which one person interviews another about how Covid 19 vaccinations are wildly inconsistent from one batch to another (some being only pure saline), and if you wind up getting the "real" shot then you have shortened your life by an unknown amount. They make a bunch of claims about what doctors or nurses have told them, and state that Covid 19 vaccines are "not pharmaceuticals." The female person repeats the claim that the UN has imposed a quota system on each country or state as to how many of their own population they need to kill as part of this planned global de-population.
Joe provided an accurate, non-emotional synopsis.
There's so much crazy going on in the world, I'm not writing off the idea as completely impossible.
It's a scripted video, in which one person interviews another about how Covid 19 vaccinations are wildly inconsistent from one batch to another (some being only pure saline), and if you wind up getting the "real" shot then you have shortened your life by an unknown amount. They make a bunch of claims about what doctors or nurses have told them, and state that Covid 19 vaccines are "not pharmaceuticals." The female person repeats the claim that the UN has imposed a quota system on each country or state as to how many of their own population they need to kill as part of this planned global de-population.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Covid is an experimental vaccine. Experimental. Even during mass rollout the pharma companies were sending out test batches that varied the strength of the dose. This is irrefutable. There were (are?) batches that were far more deadly than others, as in deadly side effects. What this woman postulates is taking it to the next level, but what is absolutely fact is that pharma companies continued to experiment with the vaccine even during rollout. C'mon, they're rolling out completely new variants now...how much testing was done prior? Very little, I'd guess.
https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadI...CodeTable.html