General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2014, 11:02 PM
  #521  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

Come on guys, if I wanted to read people bickering about stupid off-topic **** I'd read the m.net thread.
thenuge26 is offline  
Old 10-04-2014, 12:15 AM
  #522  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
cordycord is offline  
Old 10-04-2014, 12:26 AM
  #523  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Come on guys, if I wanted to read people bickering about stupid off-topic **** I'd read the m.net thread.
But we're not bickering. We're making smart *** comments and entertaining ourselves given the lack of real ND news. That's the mt way.

Originally Posted by cordycord
Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
Much more expensive petrol (apparently, they don't have gasoline).

More powerful Green political movement.

Punitive taxes on engine sizes that exceed 1.6L.

Other than that . . . .
hornetball is offline  
Old 10-04-2014, 12:33 AM
  #524  
Elite Member
 
DeerHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,982
Total Cats: 2,229
Default

Originally Posted by Monk
Just when we think Americans have no knowledge of or interest in what goes on north of their border...

Originally Posted by hornetball
But we're not bickering. We're making smart *** comments and entertaining ourselves given the lack of real ND news. That's the mt way.
What he said.
DeerHunter is offline  
Old 10-04-2014, 01:13 AM
  #525  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by yenadar
I took a dyno chart from a 155hp/150tq 2.0L SkyActive engine, converted it to Excel, and then manual played with the torque curve to shift it 600rpm higher in the rev range. I did this because a higher redline really suggests that Mazda would use more appropriately tuned intake and exhaust dimensions to support that extra RPM, and possibly cam differences.

It produces a pretty compelling number at ~154whp, which is about 170hp at the crank with the Mazda3's drivetrain losses. The ND's losses will be higher due to RWD vs FWD, driveshaft and all, but it should still make at least the 167hp mark of the NC if the 600rpm northward torque shift is anywhere close to accurate. If I underestimate the torque curve shift, it could easily climb up another 5-10hp.

My issue is that while the NA/NB engines are basically Briggs & Stratton technology, that's what we love about them; they can actually be tweaked and updated. I've worked on MZR direct injection engines and it ain't the same animal. The SkyActiv architecture is commendable--especially since they've decided to buck the "one size fits most" strategy of the rest of the industry. But I wonder how the car will react to pistons that don't have that funky divot in the middle, or if DIYAutotune/AEM et al will be able to offer a real product for a direct injection engine. Will it all go back to piggyback systems?
cordycord is offline  
Old 10-04-2014, 05:22 AM
  #526  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NiklasFalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Will it all go back to piggyback systems?
Hopefully EcuTec or similar will support it in the end, but it will most probably not be as wild as the opportunities on the Brigg&Pratton.
NiklasFalk is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:26 PM
  #527  
Senior Member
 
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Someone on mnet is claiming to have been in a focus group session:

I just came back from automotive survey featuring 2 ND miatas, one with soft top right hand drive like the one we saw in Monterey. One with targa/power retractable hardtop concept. They are being comparing against Audi TT, BMW Z4, Toyota FRS and Mini copper convertible.

The final number for miata is 155hp with 148ft/lbs and 2300lbs for soft top and 2400lbs for retractable hardtop concept. Retractable hard top / targa has panorama roof like the SLK.

The interior of the new ND feel smaller than my current NC. The door is higher or the seat is lower than current NC. Six speed manual is standard with keyless start stop. Navigation is on the Japanese model but doesn't know if American model have the navigation option. The navigation display is the Same as the new Mazda 3.

Soft top starting price in 30,495 and retractable hardtop/targa is 32,985
The 155hp, 30.5k sticker, and the fact that it was posted at 1:30am Pacific makes me thing that someone just got drunk and was ******* around, but who knows?
Dunning Kruger Affect is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:28 PM
  #528  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,949
Total Cats: 1,003
Default

If base price is over $30k it'll probably be DOA. It'll sell in S2k numbers at most.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:30 PM
  #529  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

Yikes. People compare hp and price when they shop for cars. 155hp at 30k sounds awful.
asmasm is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:32 PM
  #530  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

Originally Posted by asmasm
Yikes. People compare hp and price when they shop for cars. 155hp at 30k sounds awful.
More than double your hp at the same price with a mustang.
Stealth97 is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 12:45 PM
  #531  
Senior Member
 
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

I'm taking it with a grain of salt because it's a random dude off of mnet that isn't Mark Booth.
Dunning Kruger Affect is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 01:46 PM
  #532  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

If the above is to be believed

ND ~ 155hp/148ft-lbs ~ 2300lbs ~ $30,000

And they are comparing it to...

Cooper S Convertible ~ 181hp/177ft-lbs ~2800lbs ~ $28,700
BMW Z4 sDrive28i ~240hp/260ft-lbs ~3300lbs~ $48,950
Scion FRS ~ 200hp/151ft-lbs ~ 2758lbs ~ $25,470
Audi TT ~ 211hp/258ft-lbs ~ 3340lbs ~ $43,350

(These are "starting at" MSRP prices and specs from the manufacturers websites for current models, so I assume 2015 at this point in the year)

I did some meaningless quickie back of the napkin calculations...

Dollars per HP:
ND - $193.5/hp
CS - $158.6/hp
Z4 - $203.9/hp
FRS - $127.3/hp
TT - $205.4/hp

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
ND - 0.067
CS - 0.065
Z4 - 0.073
FRS - 0.073
TT - 0.063

Then Mazda has a LOT of work to do
EO2K is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 02:15 PM
  #533  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
Dollars per HP:
ND - $193.5/hp
CS - $158.6/hp
Z4 - $203.9/hp
FRS - $127.3/hp
TT - $205.4/hp

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
ND - 0.067
CS - 0.065
Z4 - 0.073
FRS - 0.073
TT - 0.063

Then Mazda has a LOT of work to do
2015 Mustang GT

Dollars per HP:
$73.56

Power to weight (hp/lbs):
0.117

Not an apples to apples comparison between these sports cars and and a heavy american sports coupe, but even still, for $32k you can have a 435 hp V8.
$30k is not a Miata price. **** is nuts.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 04:04 PM
  #534  
Junior Member
 
Filipe Dias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Portugal
Posts: 116
Total Cats: 26
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Hmmm, what makes them Euro-peeuns so different than us that their market would get a smaller engine? Whatever they've got over there, I sure hope it doesn't catch on...
The fact that our tax over the car price is based primarily on the displacement of the engine and CO2
Filipe Dias is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 05:38 PM
  #535  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Filipe Dias
The fact that our tax over the car price is based primarily on the displacement of the engine and CO2
Boy, that type of regulation would seem to take all the fun out of driving...or at least make it really expensive. Yep, I sure hope it doesn't catch on here.
cordycord is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 06:02 PM
  #536  
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Lokiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 993
Total Cats: 245
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
Boy, that type of regulation would seem to take all the fun out of driving...or at least make it really expensive. Yep, I sure hope it doesn't catch on here.
In the land of "There's no substitute for cubic inches!" I doubt that will ever happen.

Unfortunately Australia has traditionally preferred larger torquey engines but we're slowly moving towards smaller engine cars due to the fact that petrol is about 3-4x more expensive than in the US. Weirdly though, 4WDs are becoming extremely popular family cars?
Lokiel is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 08:24 PM
  #537  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Lokiel
In the land of "There's no substitute for cubic inches!" I doubt that will ever happen.

Unfortunately Australia has traditionally preferred larger torquey engines but we're slowly moving towards smaller engine cars due to the fact that petrol is about 3-4x more expensive than in the US. Weirdly though, 4WDs are becoming extremely popular family cars?
3x-4x more expensive?! Crap! The kind of policies that would create expensive gasoline would really hurt low and middle income families here; the dreaded 1 percenters wouldn't have a bad time...but they don't buy Miatas.

I suppose the shaky auto industry in Detroit would really be hurt as well (big cubes and all), even if most of it is now owned by the Italians...
cordycord is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 08:58 PM
  #538  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
3x-4x more expensive?! Crap!
Crap indeed. I'd like to discuss an exciting bridge-buying opportunity with you.
Savington is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 09:01 PM
  #539  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Crap indeed. I'd like to discuss an exciting bridge-buying opportunity with you.
Bridge? Who cares about a bridge when we have HIGH SPEED RAIL DUDE!!!! Yes, three times the cost and half the estimated passengers and speed, but I TRUST THE GOVERNMENT! Don't you?
cordycord is offline  
Old 10-05-2014, 09:52 PM
  #540  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cordycord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,450
Total Cats: 479
Default

Like it or not....agree with it or not...government regulations have a direct correlation to what we end up driving. It's not that I advocate bringing back unrestricted two stroke engines for cars, but this stupid government crap does have a bearing on what type of engine will end up in the ND.

By the negative props being given out, apparently some people don't want to even admit this. And they certainly don't want opposing viewpoints.
cordycord is offline  


Quick Reply: miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.