I'd like to see a few prototype pictures if possible just to get an idea of what fits where.
Are you guys at a point where you can post some? |
Originally Posted by superdve
(Post 878619)
I'd like to see a few prototype pictures if possible just to get an idea of what fits where.
Are you guys at a point where you can post some? |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 878457)
We won't test the manifold beyond what the 6258 is capable of, no. I have a tenative plan to offer a 500whp-capable EFR7064 kit, but that will be a no A/C, no P/S kit with a price tag closer to $10k, and that's only if the 6258 kits sell well.
Turbo hit block? That's a Faeflora-sized turbo. |
Originally Posted by soviet
(Post 878687)
O_O
Turbo hit block? That's a Faeflora-sized turbo. Let's keep on topic with the 6258 kit, though - if someone's really interested in a 7064 kit then they can send me a PM/email. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 878679)
We don't publicly release prototype pictures, sorry. We'll post pictures when production parts arrive.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 878679)
We don't publicly release prototype pictures, sorry. We'll post pictures when production parts arrive.
FWIW, any PM's would be kept private as I don't plan to produce turbo kits. ;) |
All the work and knowledge that has gone into my road-race turbo car is going directly into this kit. The running joke is that I've been doing R&D on these kits for 5 years ;)
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 878824)
All the work and knowledge that has gone into my road-race turbo car is going directly into this kit. The running joke is that I've been doing R&D on these kits for 5 years ;)
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 878833)
Well, we did free R&D for other people for a while, can you count that period?
|
would you consider selling only the mani, turbo and dp?
|
Originally Posted by self
(Post 878865)
would you consider selling only the mani, turbo and dp?
|
I'm guessing that we're still too far away for a reasonably accurate ETA, but are we thinking in terms of months or years?
|
Originally Posted by jnshk
(Post 878870)
I'm guessing that we're still too far away for a reasonably accurate ETA, but are we thinking in terms of months or years?
|
Originally Posted by jnshk
(Post 878870)
I'm guessing that we're still too far away for a reasonably accurate ETA, but are we thinking in terms of months or years?
|
Originally Posted by self
(Post 878865)
would you consider selling only the mani, turbo and dp?
FYI, if we were to sell those three parts separately, you'd be looking at a price tag of at least $2000. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 878679)
We don't publicly release prototype pictures, sorry. We'll post pictures when production parts arrive.
:giggle: |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Doppelgänger
(Post 878977)
You haz not fully disclosed the prototype? Is this a Holy Grail?
:giggle: |
So no 1.6 / NA6 option hey? Shame.... can't be convinced?
|
No, they were only made for 3 years vs. 12 for the 1.8 variants. You're lucky if he makes them capable with '94-'97 1.8s.
I'm not bitter btw, it's a smart business move, us 1.6 guys have Abe. |
Originally Posted by curly
(Post 879606)
I'm not bitter btw, it's a smart business move, us 1.6 guys have Abe.
I can't wait to see these things :party: |
Originally Posted by gslender
(Post 879602)
So no 1.6 / NA6 option hey? Shame.... can't be convinced?
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 879766)
$6,000 on a turbo kit,
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 879766)
we recommend spending the extra $800 on a healthy low-miles 1.8 liter motor.
Equally, if I was spending nearly $7000 on top of my existing NA6 then perhaps I should sell it and put all that money towards a later model turbo and upgrade it... Or even consider a whole range of alternate options. G |
Originally Posted by gslender
(Post 879602)
So no 1.6 / NA6 option hey? Shame.... can't be convinced?
the lack of a 1.6L kit makes it more legit. |
Originally Posted by gslender
(Post 879771)
Ouch! That's an expensive kit then!
|
Once you "option out" an FM2 kit to include all of the things the TSE kit will have as standard, the cost difference will be negligible.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 879976)
Once you "option out" an FM2 kit to include all of the things the TSE kit will have as standard, the cost difference will be negligible.
|
If the kit is that top end, then a 2nd hand 1.8 isnt the right option either, a rebuilt 1.6 or 1.8 with stronger internals is.
Hey, if you're happy to disregard a global market of 1.6 customers (cause outside the USA the 1.6 was sold for longer periods) and content with the volume of sales you'll get in the local domestic market then all is good. Happy to move on. G |
Originally Posted by gslender
(Post 880054)
If the kit is that top end, then a 2nd hand 1.8 isnt the right option either, a rebuilt 1.6 or 1.8 with stronger internals is.
For sentimental value, sure, for cost, nah. I could understand it if you were after the smaller displacement for classing reasons. Or if you want to play with a "1.6 VVT"... |
is there a 1.6L vvt? 1.6L is weaksauce, no one who's anyone drives one.
|
Recognizing the inherent sarcasm here, I just realized that rouhgly half of the Admin / Supermod crew are rocking 1.6 engines, which is statistically improbable given the known distribution of Miata engines.
What does this say about us as a group? |
|
Gslender, 1.8s in perfectly good condition ARE 800 or less. Even in australia.
Dann |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 880066)
Recognizing the inherent sarcasm here, I just realized that rouhgly half of the Admin / Supermod crew are rocking 1.6 engines, which is statistically improbable given the known distribution of Miata engines.
What does this say about us as a group? |
Pretty much
|
I prefer to think of it as "we're not paid enough".
Y8s apparently really knows how to please Rick. |
Originally Posted by gslender
(Post 880054)
If the kit is that top end, then a 2nd hand 1.8 isnt the right option either, a rebuilt 1.6 or 1.8 with stronger internals is.
Hey, if you're happy to disregard a global market of 1.6 customers (cause outside the USA the 1.6 was sold for longer periods) and content with the volume of sales you'll get in the local domestic market then all is good. Happy to move on. G The 1.6 was sold but the 1.8 is the superior engine. Should I make a turbo for the v6 GM cars or the LSX cars. Simple choice unless you are forced by engine classing. And I loved my 92 1.6 miata. |
I love my 1.6l miata considering I've done every mod to make it on par with a base 94...now todo something with all that loss of torque and spool and inferior boner ppower.
|
At the end of the day, the 1.6 is an inferior motor. It doesn't have the displacement or the port flow of the later 1.8s, and if you are talking about spending a bunch of money on a world-class turbo setup, we don't see a reason to put it on an inferior motor. In general, we don't work with 1.6 motors - the swap is not difficult at all and the benefits are significant.
Put a check for $60k in my hands and I will build 10 1.6 kits. Until then, let's keep this thread on topic. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 880073)
You all are cheap?
Actually, saying "you are all cheap" is rather more polite than what I had in mind.
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 880089)
At the end of the day, the 1.6 is an inferior motor. It doesn't have the displacement or the port flow of the later 1.8s, and if you are talking about spending a bunch of money on a world-class turbo setup, we don't see a reason to put it on an inferior motor.
To be honest, I'm a little bit surprised that the 1.6 still receives the attention that it does from folks like Bell and FM, given the age of these motors, the relatively small number of them which were produced in the first place, the even smaller number of them which are still on the road, and the fact that the cars in which they are fitted are probably most likely to be owned by the biggest cheapskates within the community (eg: those least likely to spend $5000 turbocharging a $1,000 car.) |
no replacement for displacement. /discussion
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 880066)
Recognizing the inherent sarcasm here, I just realized that rouhgly half of the Admin / Supermod crew are rocking 1.6 engines, which is statistically improbable given the known distribution of Miata engines.
What does this say about us as a group? |
Originally Posted by soviet
(Post 880190)
Roughly 100% of the Admin / Supermod 1.6 crew will not buy a trackspeed setup.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 880121)
no replacement for displacement. /discussion
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ing_engine.jpg |
looks like a simple/straightforward swap.
do it :D |
I would love to see the crank/cam wheel setup on that engine.
|
2 Attachment(s)
|
:bowrofl:
This thread has finally reached greatness. |
OH SHI..! Oh no he di'nt!
Epic! |
Originally Posted by TurboTim
(Post 880748)
|
That must be the "hardware only" kit without the AEM:D
|
How...the hell do the intercooler pipes fit? Intercooler with the necks on the bottom?
|
Are you going to sell an intake too?
|
Why was there no mention of JDM gauges before?
|
For the uninitiated, that is not a picture of our turbo kit. ;)
|
Don't lie.
|
It's a picture of the 1.6 kit ! Wahoo !!
|
Exhaust
Savington,
How much of the exhaust will be supplied with the kit? Just the downpipe? If so, am I correct in assuming it will mate with aftermarket parts from other vendors, such as FM? I'd like to go with a 3-inch diameter all the way back. |
True full 3" downpipe will be supplied, but not the rest of the exhaust. We do plan on having an exhaust option in the future, may be available as soon as the kit is ready.
|
crashnscar, thanks for the reply.
Second, unrelated, question: I've noticed you don't offer any NC parts, and I assume you don't race the NCs. Do you have any plans to start running NCs or to develop an EFR turbo kit for the NCs? |
Not in the immediate future, no.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands