Notices
Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 949 Racing

Miata cooling system thread

Old May 13, 2015 | 10:44 AM
  #281  
Dunning Kruger Affect's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 923
Total Cats: 67
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Did some more research on this, consulted a friend that's a former HVAC engineer, had an espresso or two. It appears that I'm guilty of propagating a myth, after a fashion. I hate when that happens. Apologies to the community.

Let the coolant haul *** through the system, just like the air through the rad. Looking at our crossflow, I know we have more surface area than a traditional downflow of the same core thickness, but the gains there are modest. What gains there are from any crossflow, are not in any way related to the speed of the slower local flow rate, but the greater surface area of core vs end tank.
You must be new here; what you're supposed to do when you're wrong is to dig in your heels and double down.

(real talk: what separates good posters from bad posters is the ability and humility to accept that you're wrong)
Old May 13, 2015 | 11:54 AM
  #282  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
You must be new here; what you're supposed to do when you're wrong is to dig in your heels and double down.

(real talk: what separates good posters from bad posters is the ability and humility to accept that you're wrong)
lulz. Can't learn anything new if you are "always right". Member since '05.. wow, 10 years.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old May 13, 2015 | 03:48 PM
  #283  
jmann's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 17
From: Grants Pass, OR.
Default

Slammed200 It didn't work as the large dia bottom barrel you see in the pic. is what moves to open and I opened it in a pan of hot water to see how it worked and it won't have room to open in the reroute housing [M Tuned] as it tapers to much. Went back to a 180 with 2 quarter inch holes drilled in it for bypass.
Old May 14, 2015 | 08:55 AM
  #284  
slammed200's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 486
Total Cats: 30
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by jmann
Slammed200 It didn't work as the large dia bottom barrel you see in the pic. is what moves to open and I opened it in a pan of hot water to see how it worked and it won't have room to open in the reroute housing [M Tuned] as it tapers to much. Went back to a 180 with 2 quarter inch holes drilled in it for bypass.
Thanks for the closure, bummer it didn't work as the design looked promising.

You were running only 1 of the 1/4" holes at first, why the second one now? I would think that the 1/4" hole mimics the OEM 3/8" bypass plus the added pressure drop across the heater core effectively but maybe you've learned better.

Also, does the increased flow past the thermostat seem to drop the effective "opening temperature" of the thermostat in terms of engine temp?
Old May 14, 2015 | 10:36 AM
  #285  
jmann's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 488
Total Cats: 17
From: Grants Pass, OR.
Default

You are way over my head. I just put a second hole in when I reinstalled it to make sure I had a little more bypass effect until the stat opens. I don't go out without the car being warmed up and it seems to do that about the same as when the heater was inline. The bypass pipe is like half inch or five eigths inside dia. so I figured a second hole would be a good thing.
Old May 24, 2015 | 07:37 PM
  #286  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Is there any consensus on the currently available radiators for high hp track driven cars?

TSE and FM are the only two crossflow choices out along with a few people suggesting the Koyo Hyper-V. I'm betting the higher FPI Koyo probably does not have the cooling capacity that the others do, although it is nearly $300 less expensive which is certainly noticeable. There's less than $20 (after shipping) between the two crossflow choices. FM's is $55 cheaper until they add the $55 shipping while TSE only charges $15.
Old May 24, 2015 | 08:01 PM
  #287  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by TheBandit
FM's is $55 cheaper until they add the $55 shipping while TSE only charges $15.
Buying a critical part for your track build solely on price is not a good place to start. Figure out which will work the best for you then bite the bullet.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old May 24, 2015 | 08:16 PM
  #288  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I've heard from at least one customer who jumped from an FM crossflow to our crossflow and reported lower CLTs as a result.
Old May 24, 2015 | 08:43 PM
  #289  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Loving this discussion. Here's a situation and question:
Street car, all OEM cooling system (no re-route, stock shrouding/fans)
The MSM got a 27mm rad from Mazda vs the regular NB's 16mm. The PO of my car stupidly replaced the OEM MSM 27mm rad with a "replacement" OEM NB rad, not having a clue that they're different. I've noticed my car runs hotter than normal. It never overheated, just cycles the fans more often, and is usually in the 202-208 range after hard driving, but then goes down.

After reading crazy paranoia on M-S saying the car will overheat like crazy, and "mazda gave it a bigger rad cause it needs more rad to keep cool vs a regular nb" I was freaking out.

Then I considered how many turbo street NB's are running around with a stock radiator, most well over the power I'm making.

I mean is it a deal breaker to run the 16mm rad like this, or just not a good idea, but technically OK.

Thoughts?
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:20 PM
  #290  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Ask your water temp gauge.
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:25 PM
  #291  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Buying a critical part for your track build solely on price is not a good place to start. Figure out which will work the best for you then bite the bullet.
I was clarifying where the totals costs came from, not stating that I would be placing an order based on cost. Simply looking at the two items on their respective websites warrants a $55 difference in price. Due to the notably different shipping costs, both items come out to be nearly the same overall cost to consumer (in my situation).

Originally Posted by Savington
I've heard from at least one customer who jumped from an FM crossflow to our crossflow and reported lower CLTs as a result.
Good to note. Thanks for the info!
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:26 PM
  #292  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Ask your water temp gauge.
I already posted the temps it sits at. Thanks for your insightful contribution tho
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:38 PM
  #293  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Okay, where are you driving it? Alaska in winter only, or the Mojave? Do you street drive it in a fashion similar to my nan or race it stoplight to stoplight?

Its an incredibly broad question, that cannot be answered without a lot more metrics, and Id assume you know that.

If the question is just "is 95*c too hot?", then the answer is, its not ideal but its not going o cause a catastrophic failure either.
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:43 PM
  #294  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I'm not sure if I can make it more specific, and not for lack of trying.
Yes street driven. The temps here in summer are 95-105f, but so far the car hasn't seen hotter than 80f since the new rad. CLT 202-209 (I think the highest Ive ever seen, and it quickly went down after). Without hard driving usually 190-195

I guess my question is: is it likely the car will overheat with this rad, even though tons of turbo nb's seem to be ok with the oem 16mm rad? The most amount of WOT it sees is a burst of about 13 seconds every now and then (just a run through the gears) at most.
Old May 24, 2015 | 09:57 PM
  #295  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 66
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

I would say no. The 100% (or near) throttle duty cycle is far too low.

Dann
Old May 24, 2015 | 10:23 PM
  #296  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I'm not sure if I can make it more specific, and not for lack of trying.
Yes street driven. The temps here in summer are 95-105f, but so far the car hasn't seen hotter than 80f since the new rad. CLT 202-209 (I think the highest Ive ever seen, and it quickly went down after). Without hard driving usually 190-195

I guess my question is: is it likely the car will overheat with this rad, even though tons of turbo nb's seem to be ok with the oem 16mm rad? The most amount of WOT it sees is a burst of about 13 seconds every now and then (just a run through the gears) at most.
If you turn the A/C on and beat on it, yeah it might overheat eventually. On my car A/C is a killer for cooling.

If it were my car I'd put the MSM radiator in it. I like having extra capacity though, not having a system that's ok, but it's working at 95% to keep up. Cooling is one of the things I believe more (capacity) is better, even if you're not using it.

(and now I need to go install my factory undertray.......)
Old May 24, 2015 | 11:42 PM
  #297  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 697
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Ditto for me. 100F+ with AC on and sitting in a traffic jam seems to be the worst cooling condition on the Silver car. Once moving (even 15mph), the temp drops quickly. That traffic jam scenario was worse than track driving.
Old May 25, 2015 | 12:16 AM
  #298  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,310
Total Cats: 1,236
From: San Diego
Default

Yeah no airflow is a heatsoak nightmare. 18psi - 210 F isn't the end of the world obviously, but if you haven't seen over 80 F ambient, there's a good chance of a 100 F day putting you at temps you don't want to be seeing. But really Dann is right, your water temp gauge don't lie.. well, it shouldn't *shakes stick at all the crappy autometers in the world* so if your existing rad is enough or not is really answered quite easily by that. If you don't want to wait until summer to find out the hard way, sure a bigger rad would give you headroom.

-Ryan
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old May 25, 2015 | 12:20 AM
  #299  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Thanks guys. Pretty much what I was thinking too. I'm going to start looking for an MSM rad and keeping a close eye on the gauge (I have been ever since my "discovery"). I'd upgrade to something nice, but the car see's such short bursts of WOT that it'd probably just be a waste of money.
Old May 25, 2015 | 01:54 AM
  #300  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by hornetball
Ditto for me. 100F+ with AC on and sitting in a traffic jam seems to be the worst cooling condition on the Silver car. Once moving (even 15mph), the temp drops quickly. That traffic jam scenario was worse than track driving.
Yeap. This is why I installed an awesome pair of fans on my setup, for this exact reason. 100*F + days sitting in traffic with A/C wide open.

Now if I could get an alternator strong enough to run them.......

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.