Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Gross.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2015, 07:28 PM
  #841  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

<p>I want scientific data.</p>
aidandj is offline  
Old 09-14-2015, 08:51 PM
  #842  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Huntington, Indiana
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 616
Default

My methods are admittedly rudimentary.
My pickup squats about 1/2" on average per 100lbs.
The bed drops about 1-1/4" per the average Hoosier stripper, and 1-1/2" per average Nebraska stripper.
Assume an N of 112 for group 1 and N of 115 for group 2.
Monk is offline  
Old 09-14-2015, 10:06 PM
  #843  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Monk
9 Hoosier sized strippers.
Like the tire? I'm confused.
EO2K is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 07:00 AM
  #844  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Huntington, Indiana
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 616
Default

A Hoosier refers to a person, or sometimes thing, from Indiana.

Hoosier is a much better name for a tire company than Indianan.
Monk is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 08:54 AM
  #845  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
<p>Weight?</p>

Weight of?
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 10:48 AM
  #846  
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
EO2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Very NorCal
Posts: 10,441
Total Cats: 1,899
Default

I believe we were discussing strippers. Or maybe tires?
EO2K is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 10:49 AM
  #847  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Hoosier strippers are definitely heavier than tires.

Unless you get into the Kokomo area, then it becomes debatable. Because meth.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 10:54 AM
  #848  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Sometimes I'll go into your thread or aidans thread, and type some sort of a post, then realize that 10 pages have gone by in the meantime, with discussion about everything from hookers to anal warts, and I just hit "back" cause I don't even remember what I was commenting on anymore. ror
18psi is offline  
Old 09-15-2015, 10:55 AM
  #849  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

My thread is nowhere near as bad as his. Though that said, sometimes it's hard to remember which thread you're actually in.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 10:38 AM
  #850  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

Concealer's car made 127whp on a heart breaker mustang dyno. Not bad at all.
shuiend is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 11:23 AM
  #851  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Girz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,033
Total Cats: 324
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Concealer's car made 127whp on a heart breaker mustang dyno. Not bad at all.
Girz0r is offline  
Old 09-25-2015, 12:06 PM
  #852  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Whoa
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 10:05 AM
  #853  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Concealer's car made 127whp on a heart breaker mustang dyno. Not bad at all.
Troof!

(RPM scale is slightly off. We hit rev limiter @ 7500rpm. The way Mustang calibrates for RPM means it's a little off up top.)

2015-09-28_09-31-02 by concealer404, on Flickr

Originally Posted by Girz0r
Not shown: Everyone frantically covering their ears.

Originally Posted by vteckiller2000
Whoa
That's what we all said. I, and the shop owners were expecting more like 110-115whp, and certainly not continuing to make power all the way up. I haven't even installed the BP5A cam yet. o_O

Motor is obviously healthy, but i also seem to have inadvertently stumbled across a combination of parts that just WORKS.
Attached Thumbnails Gross.-21163924053_44b116271f_c.jpg  
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 10:06 AM
  #854  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Update copy/pasted from another forum:

Clutch update:

ACT sent me a defective disc. Spec is .312-.314" for the pads. Mine were .319, .317, .317, and .329. So that wasn't cool. What also wasn't cool was spending all the time and money to find out that i did nothing wrong and replaced a bunch of stuff that didn't need to be replaced.

ACT sent me another disc, got here Tuesday afternoon. Measured it before deciding to put it in anyways since i had to leave the next morning. .317, .319, .317, 3.18. Not cool. Of course, it did the same thing it did before, wouldn't disengage. Briefly considered sending it all back to them and telling them i'm no longer interested in running their clutches and making an emergency call up to South Bend, but i really didn't have it in me to do the job AGAIN.

So i just beat the hell out of the clutch and now it seems i've worn it down enough that it works. Still not really happy at all with the quality control or ACT's lack of caring about the huge amount of time and money of mine that they wasted, but at least i have a functioning clutch now, and i know what company to not buy clutches from in the future.

The other saving grace is that the setup is AWESOME. Super easy to drive, revs like CRAZY. Added some more NVH, has some really entertaining/bad sounding resonance decelerating in higher gears between about 5000rpms and 3000rpms, but now that i've already got 1500 miles on it, i'm pretty sure it'll be ok.

I installed a Scosche amp interface in order to clean up the signal between speaker level outputs from headunit and the factory Blose amps. Made a HUGE improvement in volume and quality, i was very excited that i might have a usable stereo on this car. And then i got on the highway and still couldn't hear it. Bummer. Looks like stereo is in fact coming out this week. Lost cause.

One of my foglights also shattered when i hit my bumper on some train tracks. They look cool, and actually worked, but light output was poor and i don't feel like spending money to replace it, so the foglights are getting removed this week as well, will eventually throw brake ducts in the holes.


Also: Dyno'd the car on Thursday at 42 Autosport in NC. This is a really conservative Mustang dyno, car seems to be VERY strong. Made a good 10whp+ more than everyone was expecting. Power is carried higher than "normal" for a BP.

127.1whp, 108.5wtq. RPMs shown on graph are slightly inaccurate, we spun it to 7500.

2015-09-28_09-31-34 by concealer404, on Flickr

2015-09-28_09-31-02 by concealer404, on Flickr

Due to power it made and the fact that i still haven't REALLY driven it and thought "MAN THIS THING IS SLOW," i had a rare moment of clarity and have decided that i'm not going to open the motor for another year. Instead, i'll focus on dialing in the suspension, brakes, swapping the seats because i've had enough of these Cobras, and working on aero. The parts i already have for the motor will be installed (BP5A intake cam, Honda intake manifold in the works), and i'll probably get a Haltech on it.

Looking at eventually running TTD with it.
Attached Thumbnails Gross.-21773266132_a3540d63e8_c.jpg   Gross.-21163924053_44b116271f_c.jpg  
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 11:08 AM
  #855  
Senior Member
 
Mazduh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 697
Total Cats: 26
Default

Wow... Good numbers.
Mazduh is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 11:14 AM
  #856  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Yep! Can't wait to see what it does with BP5A cam, Hawnduh intake manifold, and Haltech Elite 1500. He's an angry little beast.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 11:58 AM
  #857  
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
sixshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,652
Total Cats: 3,011
Default

If the RPM numbers were off as indicated in the graph then the car actually made more horsepower than indicated.
You have more than 127.1.
sixshooter is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 12:00 PM
  #858  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

How do you know the RPM numbers were off? Based on the tach?
aidandj is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 12:04 PM
  #859  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
If the RPM numbers were off as indicated in the graph then the car actually made more horsepower than indicated.
You have more than 127.1.
It was spun to 7500rpm. I didn't mess with doing the maths.

Originally Posted by aidandj
How do you know the RPM numbers were off? Based on the tach?
BP5A ecu has 7500rpm limit. The problem is that when you set calibration RPM on a Mustang dyno with a stock ECU, when it asks you to move the car to 3500rpm in your testing gear to sync up, you're relying on the garbage Mazda factory tach. That becomes an issue, because your "sync" rpm wasn't REALLY 3500, but the dyno now "thinks" that it was. Inaccurate at 3500rpm = Inaccurate at 7500rpm, probably more so.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 09-28-2015, 12:24 PM
  #860  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SchmoozerJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 746
Total Cats: 85
Default

JDM ECU powahs, duh.
SchmoozerJoe is offline  


Quick Reply: Gross.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.