Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

TSE EFR NB2 Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2017, 06:23 PM
  #321  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
Did you compare the numbers to the ones on the FM site? For a 6-speed (which is what I believe MiataMan's car has), those are correct.

--Ian
Yes, its a 6spd
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 06:41 PM
  #322  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

one question. See how cyl 1 and cyl 4 are spiking at almost the same time? Well, cyl 1 only spikes to 8%. same thing with cyl 3. So my question is, why are they spiking the same amount (height wise) on the log if the actual % is not as much as cyl 2 and 4?
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 06:44 PM
  #323  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Manually scale the knock sensor graph so that 0% is the bottom and 25% is the top. In that graph, the spike of 8% appears the same as a spike of 12% because of the auto-ranging scale. Normally auto-ranging is great, but not in this case.
Savington is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 08:08 PM
  #324  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Manually scale the knock sensor graph so that 0% is the bottom and 25% is the top. In that graph, the spike of 8% appears the same as a spike of 12% because of the auto-ranging scale. Normally auto-ranging is great, but not in this case.
Yeah, auto-ranging is great when you're looking at variables that are independent, but if you want to compare two then you need to force manual scaling.

If you ever try to instrument and compare various pressure reading (MAP, pre-intercooler, turbine inlet, pre-cat, etc) then you'll want to do this as well.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 09:10 PM
  #325  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Manually scale the knock sensor graph so that 0% is the bottom and 25% is the top. In that graph, the spike of 8% appears the same as a spike of 12% because of the auto-ranging scale. Normally auto-ranging is great, but not in this case.
knock sensor graph? Are you talking about the knock input threshold graph?

Here are my setting for knock input threshold:


I just took a 3rd gear log on wastegate only.
2017-02-02 wastegate.msl
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 09:14 PM
  #326  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

I changed the cells below 4k to 6% btw
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 11:18 PM
  #327  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by MiataMan00
knock sensor graph? Are you talking about the knock input threshold graph?
No, in MegaLogViewer. Normally, MLV looks through the log and sets the top and bottom of the displayed range based upon the highest and lowest values it finds in the log. This means that if cylinder 2 peaks at a value of 80%, but spends most of its time at 40%, then it will look lower than cylinder 3 which peaks at 35%, but spends most of its time at 35%.

To fix this, go into 'Calculated Fields', 'Fixed Field Min and Max', then 'Add Fixed Field'. Set the min and max on all 4 cylinder knock values to the same levels, and now you can compare them visually.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 11:28 PM
  #328  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
No, in MegaLogViewer. Normally, MLV looks through the log and sets the top and bottom of the displayed range based upon the highest and lowest values it finds in the log. This means that if cylinder 2 peaks at a value of 80%, but spends most of its time at 40%, then it will look lower than cylinder 3 which peaks at 35%, but spends most of its time at 35%.

To fix this, go into 'Calculated Fields', 'Fixed Field Min and Max', then 'Add Fixed Field'. Set the min and max on all 4 cylinder knock values to the same levels, and now you can compare them visually.

--Ian
Perfect! Thanks Ian. Just got that dialed in. Looks much better now.
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 11:35 PM
  #329  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
That's knock on cyl#2. Not a lot, not very bad, but a tiny bit. You can also see a little on cyl around the 2sec mark. Could be as simple as running the car too lean there (12.4:1 in that range). I would fatten it up to 11.8 and pull 2deg of timing at that boost level. There's also a little puff of knock at 9.413s in the same log.
Andrew, my log shows 11.8. So pull timing instead? EDIT: Doh, you were refereeing to a different knock point. My bad....again.
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 12:31 AM
  #330  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

I just want to say THANK YOU to everyone who has helped/ put up with me so far. I know I ask a lot of questions but I'm learning.

Speaking of questions and putting up with me...in the morning 3 log (all of the above) around the 9sec mark for example there is 12% knock in cyl 4. So when I'm looking at the spark table, the cross section of 5600RPM and 157kpa is 19.8. But in the log it knocks at 17.9*. Soooo.... I'm kinda confused. Do I pull 2* from the 19.8?
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 12:55 AM
  #331  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
yossi126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 854
Total Cats: -15
Default

If the engine knocks reduce timing by the lower cell. I would get a headphone-knock set up and solve your knock on the dyno where it's safe.
Did you cross your spark table with the spark in the log? Does your ecu actually reduce timing?
yossi126 is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 01:52 AM
  #332  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by MiataMan00
I just want to say THANK YOU to everyone who has helped/ put up with me so far. I know I ask a lot of questions but I'm learning.

Speaking of questions and putting up with me...in the morning 3 log (all of the above) around the 9sec mark for example there is 12% knock in cyl 4. So when I'm looking at the spark table, the cross section of 5600RPM and 157kpa is 19.8. But in the log it knocks at 17.9*. Soooo.... I'm kinda confused. Do I pull 2* from the 19.8?
Keep in mind that it's extrapolating between four cells. You can load your current tune into MLV on the righthand side and see exactly where the trace dot is. That will give you a better idea of which cells are having the greatest impact on the actual figure.
Savington is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 01:53 AM
  #333  
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
aidandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Default

You need to post a tune along with the logs. Then we don't have to keep asking you what your settings are.
aidandj is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 02:41 AM
  #334  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Keep in mind that it's extrapolating between four cells. You can load your current tune into MLV on the righthand side and see exactly where the trace dot is. That will give you a better idea of which cells are having the greatest impact on the actual figure.
oh cool. I didnt know I could do that. I don't know a lot of things
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 02:45 AM
  #335  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
You need to post a tune along with the logs. Then we don't have to keep asking you what your settings are.
I was literally just about to do that.

here is my current tune:
CurrentTune.msq

a 2-3-4-5.25 pull:
morning1.msl

And wastegate 3rd gear pull:
2017-02-02 wastegate.msl

a 4-5-6.25 pull:
morning3.msl
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 03:54 AM
  #336  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
yossi126's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 854
Total Cats: -15
Default

Your engine is knocking. Start by reducing 3 degrees in your 178 and 157 rows from 3000 rpm. Your car will feel slower but you will be safe until you can hear knock with headphones and live tune your ignition table for safe power.
yossi126 is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 12:34 PM
  #337  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by yossi126
Your engine is knocking. Start by reducing 3 degrees in your 178 and 157 rows from 3000 rpm. Your car will feel slower but you will be safe until you can hear knock with headphones and live tune your ignition table for safe power.
So from 3k to 7k pull 3*? or just the cells at the cross sections
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 01:26 PM
  #338  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by MiataMan00
So from 3k to 7k pull 3*? or just the cells at the cross sections
Pulling that much timing across the board is a band-aid, and will spike your EGTs if your run it like that at the track. Helps the rods and pistons, sure, but not so good for the exhaust valves.

Have you dyno-tuned the car?

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 03:19 PM
  #339  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
icantlearn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 117
Default

Originally Posted by codrus
Pulling that much timing across the board is a band-aid, and will spike your EGTs if your run it like that at the track. Helps the rods and pistons, sure, but not so good for the exhaust valves.

Have you dyno-tuned the car?

--Ian
I have not. I want to wait until the motor is built to drop money on a protune.

Im hearing different things from different people. So I'm a little confused on what to do. I think I'm just going I do what Andrew says.
icantlearn is offline  
Old 02-03-2017, 03:28 PM
  #340  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by MiataMan00
I have not. I want to wait until the motor is built to drop money on a protune.
For $300 you can rent a couple hours on the dyno and get a pretty good DIY timing tune for the track. No pro tuner required.

--Ian
codrus is offline  


Quick Reply: TSE EFR NB2 Build Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.