The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
As an example, consider two ostensibly reliable and objective sources of information, WebMD, and the Mayo Clinic.
Mayo has this to say on the subject:
.
Gender dysphoria is a diagnosis listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), a manual published by the American Psychiatric Association to diagnose mental conditions. This term is intended to be more descriptive than the one that was previously used, gender identity disorder.
.By contrast, WebMD (which is owned by Internet Brands, the same company which enjoys breaking the code which runs MiataTurbo in their spare time), states:
.
Gender dysphoria used to be called “gender identity disorder.” But the mismatch between body and internal sense of gender is not a mental illness. Instead, what need to be addressed are the stress, anxiety, and depression that go along with it.
.By altering the meaning of words and phrases, the though process itself can be shaped to match a desired ideal. In the past, that ideal was to single out specific racial groups as "evil" or "sub-human," to justify their enslavement or extermination. Today, the ideal is to make everyone feel happy and comfortable about themselves, without regard for whether this leads to harm to themselves or to society as a whole.
The best/worst example of this is the HAES morons, in a country that screams about health care all the time you'd expect that stupidity to be squashed like a bug.
Don't forget that more older US citizens consider themselves Republicans as opposed to more younger citizens who consider themselves Democrats.
In other words, Republicans are dying off at a higher rate due to being older, so that also comes into play.
Another 20-30 years and Republicans might be only 10% of the voting age population.
Gonna have to start up a new party once that happens and the current Democrats have aged to the point they are the old people.
In other words, Republicans are dying off at a higher rate due to being older, so that also comes into play.
Another 20-30 years and Republicans might be only 10% of the voting age population.
Gonna have to start up a new party once that happens and the current Democrats have aged to the point they are the old people.
So, a few important points:
1: I am not denying that fraud occurred. In fact, I don't know of anyone who is denying that, with the exception of 99% of Democrats, the vast majority of the media, and pretty much everyone else who dislikes scary orange man.
2: Both Pew and Gallup say that the percentage of Americans who identify as Republican (both as a share of the population as a whole, as well as a share of registered voters) has been in decline for the past 15 years or so, with that trend accelerating early on in Trump's term. Sources for data:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/315734/...democrats.aspx
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics...raphic-groups/
3: Many people would tend to describe the remaining minority of the US population who identify as Republican (a particularly those who specifically support / approve-of former President Trump) as a "fringe group." I'm not being sarcastic about that, it's the truth. The Republican party has done a lot of damage to itself over the past few decades.
1: I am not denying that fraud occurred. In fact, I don't know of anyone who is denying that, with the exception of 99% of Democrats, the vast majority of the media, and pretty much everyone else who dislikes scary orange man.
2: Both Pew and Gallup say that the percentage of Americans who identify as Republican (both as a share of the population as a whole, as well as a share of registered voters) has been in decline for the past 15 years or so, with that trend accelerating early on in Trump's term. Sources for data:
https://news.gallup.com/poll/315734/...democrats.aspx
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics...raphic-groups/
3: Many people would tend to describe the remaining minority of the US population who identify as Republican (a particularly those who specifically support / approve-of former President Trump) as a "fringe group." I'm not being sarcastic about that, it's the truth. The Republican party has done a lot of damage to itself over the past few decades.
[QUOTE=Diamond Dave;1591220 blah blah blah. .[/QUOTE]
You stated specifically: At no time EVER has anyone said that Minimum wage must be a "living wage"
I proved that it is the explicit reason a minimum wage was established.
It's not that I'm terrified of people who think differently than me. I'm scared of people who can't differentiate fact from fiction. And your statement quoted above, is pure fantasy.
You stated specifically: At no time EVER has anyone said that Minimum wage must be a "living wage"
I proved that it is the explicit reason a minimum wage was established.
It's not that I'm terrified of people who think differently than me. I'm scared of people who can't differentiate fact from fiction. And your statement quoted above, is pure fantasy.
If that's the case, where's the proof? Why were Trump's army of lawyers unable to provide ANY evidence of this fraud? It wasn't Democrat/Liberal judges throwing the cases out, it was Trump's own appointed judges. How does that make any sense if the fraud is so widespread and rampant?
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
If that's the case, where's the proof? Why were Trump's army of lawyers unable to provide ANY evidence of this fraud? It wasn't Democrat/Liberal judges throwing the cases out, it was Trump's own appointed judges. How does that make any sense if the fraud is so widespread and rampant?
That first point was intended to be interpreted somewhat like a double-negative. That's why I wrote "... with the exception of 99% of Democrats, the vast majority of the media, and pretty much everyone else who dislikes scary orange man ..."
The idea it was meant to convey was that, because a majority of Americans appear to dislike Orange Man (which I cited sources for a few posts ago), only a minority of Americans, specifically a portion of those who like Orange Man, vehemently believe that rampant and coordinated fraud took place, despite the absence of evidence to support this conclusion. Braineack is a member of that minority, and believes that the absence of strong evidence is actually proof of just how deep and widespread the conspiracy is.
Personally, I have no strong reason to care whether fraud did or did not occur. It's as irrelevant to the actual outcome as the will of the people is irrelevant to the functioning of their government.
Junior Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 421
Total Cats: 16
Proof of what, fraud?
That first point was intended to be interpreted somewhat like a double-negative. That's why I wrote "... with the exception of 99% of Democrats, the vast majority of the media, and pretty much everyone else who dislikes scary orange man ..."
The idea it was meant to convey was that, because a majority of Americans appear to dislike Orange Man (which I cited sources for a few posts ago), only a minority of Americans, specifically a portion of those who like Orange Man, vehemently believe that rampant and coordinated fraud took place, despite the absence of evidence to support this conclusion. Braineack is a member of that minority, and believes that the absence of strong evidence is actually proof of just how deep and widespread the conspiracy is.
Personally, I have no strong reason to care whether fraud did or did not occur. It's as irrelevant to the actual outcome as the will of the people is irrelevant to the functioning of their government.
That first point was intended to be interpreted somewhat like a double-negative. That's why I wrote "... with the exception of 99% of Democrats, the vast majority of the media, and pretty much everyone else who dislikes scary orange man ..."
The idea it was meant to convey was that, because a majority of Americans appear to dislike Orange Man (which I cited sources for a few posts ago), only a minority of Americans, specifically a portion of those who like Orange Man, vehemently believe that rampant and coordinated fraud took place, despite the absence of evidence to support this conclusion. Braineack is a member of that minority, and believes that the absence of strong evidence is actually proof of just how deep and widespread the conspiracy is.
Personally, I have no strong reason to care whether fraud did or did not occur. It's as irrelevant to the actual outcome as the will of the people is irrelevant to the functioning of their government.
As far as fraud is concerned, I still just feel "odd" that ...
- Biden winning a little over half of the counties that Obama won in 2012 - which amounts to Orange man winning ~80% of the total counties this time around.
- With having ~half the counties that Obama won, managed to bring out an additional 10M votes?
- The argument is that all the votes came from small counties that were more urban (heavily populated) - but the counties with record turnout (close if not over 100%) were in the swing states that stopped counting on election night for reasons x,y,z - coincidentally all running Domin wares.
- And if that was the case... shouldn't there have been record turnout in ALL (if not, many many more) urban counties?
- Taking 5 hours to count 99% of the vote and then taking 5 days to count the last 1% - and for that one state that did a recount, they counted ALL the votes in a day?
- A huge swing to red congressional seats (meaning... people did NOT want Orange man, but they still REALLY loved the idea of getting a new Red seat?)
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
The GOP lost three positions in the Senate (3% of total Senate seats), and gained eleven positions in the house (2.5% of total House seats), for a net loss of 0.5% of overall representation in Congress.
So when will "racism" be considered a mental illness by the quacks in power? I mean, everything seems to be a mental illness these days and not your fault.
BTW, asking for a friend. I'm a minority and therefore can't be racist.
BTW, asking for a friend. I'm a minority and therefore can't be racist.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
The debate has been raging (with people taking surprising viewpoints), for some time. Examples:
How racism came to be called a mental illness — and why that’s a problem (from 2016)
Are racists mentally ill? (from 2014)
One challenge to the argument comes from the liberal side. The same folks who decided that gender dysphoria isn't a mental illness (because it's perfectly natural, and not deviant at all) object to racism being a mental illness, rather curiously, because it is not "perfectly natural." Instead, they argue that racism is a learned behavior, whereas things like bipolar disorder are not.
Now, I'd argue that depression and PTSD have become learned behaviors based on, well, observing society for the past few decades. It's presently fashionable to have disabilities / disadvantages to trot out as part of your bio & group-identity, and mental illnesses are easy to conjure up. In other words, it's rather easy to make yourself depresses and traumatized by adjusting your world-view to make the normal behavior of others seem aggressive and violent.
But that's obviously a perspective which the liberal quacks would disagree with.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,036
Total Cats: 6,604
Today seems like an appropriate time to re-visit that post.
This was a very close race. Much as it was in 2016. And while my gut feeling back in 2019 when that was written was that Trump was going to suffer for his words which are not ideologically acceptable in this new era, I'd have called it a folly to completely dismiss any potential outcome at that time. Or in November of last year. Or at any point between then and now.
But, at this point, it seems reasonable to accept the fact that Trump is no longer the President, because he lost the election in 2020.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
Biden was sworn in as the new President, yes.
The slogan every vote counts means two vastly different things if you ask the right person.
The slogan every vote counts means two vastly different things if you ask the right person.
Last edited by Braineack; 01-21-2021 at 01:08 PM.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,499
Total Cats: 4,080
I'm so relieved that we're shutting down a clean pipeline so we can buy oil from the non-regulated Middle East and have it transported by thousands of huge, gas guzzling tankers who dump their oily bilge in the ocean. sCieNCe !!!