When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Non-binary teacher at my son's high school who keeps her own library for "curious" kids. Groomer much?
I asked my school supervisor some questions. Here's part of her answer:
I did a bit of research regarding “minors rights” and age of minors in other states as well. California, which allows as young as 12-year-olds to make adults decisions without parental input is quite young in my opinion. I know brains are not fully developed until the age of 25, seems more reasonable to make adult decisions at that point! Sadly, those things we cannot change at this point.Is information about medical procedures or medications given without parental notice? What about psychiatric counseling?
No, medications on campus cannot be given without parental notice. While at school, a student can only be given medications that have a doctor's order AND signed parent consent, which a record is kept in Aeries, with the exception of emergency intervention with Epinephrine (for anaphylaxis) or Naloxone (for suspected opioid overdose) as outlined in BP 5141.21(a). If these interventions are used, 911 is called and parents are informed.
As far as medications and procedures off campus, there are minor consent laws that protect adolescents and their right to medical management in certain situations. A minor, 12 years or older, may seek assistance and/or medical treatment for pregnancy or family planning (Family Code § 6925) without informing the parent. This then results in an absence that does not require parent permission. There is also a provision that permits treatment related to sexual assault (Family Code § 6928). A minor may also seek medical attention for communicable diseases. (Family Code § 6926)
In other words, certain teachers are using the State rules that would otherwise protect a minor from their abusive or sexual predator parent(s) to offer their own version of "help", including abortion services without the knowledge of the parents. And grooming, like the woman above. And she proudly TikToks about it.
Abortion, therefore, is a form of eugenics. It limits the growth of the non-white population, and also selectively targets the poor and the uneducated, who are most likely to produce offspring who also remain in poverty and achieve low educational attainment, thus exerting a parasitic effect on the society in which they live, both from and economic and a criminal perspective.
Wasn’t that Margaret Sanger’s stated objective when she launched what became Planned Parenthood?
Also, our friends in Canada aren’t propounding MAID for eugenics. It’s more as a cost-saving strategy.
California has a population of 39,000,000. And the California Secretary of State’s Office says 21,940,274 of those people were registered to vote by October 2022. That’s close to the World Population Review estimate of a 55% voter registration rate in the state. Interestingly, PILF reports that California sent out a total of 22,184,707 ballots, of which 9,781,328 were accepted (see what ballots were tossed out below). And ten million went to parts unknown and never came back.
Wasn’t that Margaret Sanger’s stated objective when she launched what became Planned Parenthood?
Also, our friends in Canada aren’t propounding MAID for eugenics. It’s more as a cost-saving strategy.
Yup. Her mom had 11 kids and a number of miscarriages, and I'm sure Margaret had to change a lot of diapers as a child. Enough diapers that she simply thought, "Gee, wouldn't it just be easier on me if we killed the baby before it ever was born?" That was her "aha" moment. That view was prolly reinforced by the concept of Eugenics.
How this twisted concept has become championed by the black community should show the rest of us how possible it would be for Socialism to take hold here as well.
there it is, the dumbest **** I've ever read in my life.
Really, go read it, its chock full of gems like "The abilities of a trans man to produce milk after having top surgery, which is a removal of the breasts, varies by individual"
Wasn’t that Margaret Sanger’s stated objective when she launched what became Planned Parenthood?
Yes.
And if you look back over the past 100 years or so of US history, it's quite impressive how the Democrat party has pivoted from a being a bunch of loud-mouthed buffoons standing in the way of schoolroom doors and turning the dogs and the firehoses against uppity negroes, to being a slick, refined party which has a substantial majority of non-white Americans convinced that they are working in their best interest, while funding and promoting programs designed to ensure their perpetual dependency and eventual elimination.
Originally Posted by xturner
Also, our friends in Canada aren’t propounding MAID for eugenics. It’s more as a cost-saving strategy.
From a practical standpoint, is there a difference?
The goal of eugenics is to improve the quality of the population. The goal of cost-savings is to improve the financial well-being of the population.
In the specific case of MAID in Canadia, those who represent the greatest cost-burden on society tend to be the same ones who are most seriously mentally and / or medically defective in some way.
Joe P, you're saying that our government (you mentioned Dems but it feels like you mean to include everyone) wants to maintain, yet also kill off a certain segment of its population?
Joe P, you're saying that our government (you mentioned Dems but it feels like you mean to include everyone) wants to maintain, yet also kill off a certain segment of its population?
I don't personally believe that the US govt has a vested interest in reducing the population. Particularly the Democrat party as relates to the poor, the ignorant, and the otherwise dependent, as that's their core fanbase.
But I acknowledge that others here are strongly convinced that various governments (including our own) are engaged in a wide-ranging conspiracy to depopulate, and I have no evidence to refute that claim, so I'm exploring the idea.
On the abortion thing, this is one place where I do believe the Democrats have, perhaps unintentionally, gotten it right.
I am one of those guys who is pretty much opposed to taxation and government spending in most forms. And nearly always when it comes to social welfare. But this is one specific area in which I am happy to contribute my tax dollars.
I would like for both medical and surgical abortions to be available free of charge (funded by my taxes), in every state, on a walk-in basis, to whomever desires them, with no restrictions at all, and without the need for parental consent for minors. I'm happy to pay for transportation services for who do not live near an abort-o-mat.
Getting an abortion in this country should be as easy and as convenient as possible, and for precisely the reasons which I've described previously.
Right now, we can see an example of this in action, as blue states are rushing to make access to abortions free, provide transportation to those seeking abortions who cannot afford to travel, and in general to educate the public, and especially those in low-income and ethnic minority areas, about how to gain access to abortion services.
All while completely ignoring to investigate or cover what is happening with the aborted fetus and why the "mature" ones are so much more desirable - hence the push for abortions up to (and including) birth.
All while completely ignoring to investigate or cover what is happening with the aborted fetus and why the "mature" ones are so much more desirable - hence the push for abortions up to (and including) birth.
All while completely ignoring to investigate or cover what is happening with the aborted fetus and why the "mature" ones are so much more desirable - hence the push for abortions up to (and including) birth.
The practical uses for aborted fetal tissue are surprisingly wide-ranging.
Obviously we all know about the use of stem cells in the development of cancer treatments. They are also being used nowadays for the purpose of cell-regeneration with the ultimate goal of producing entire organs for transplant.
There are also really weird-sounding use cases, such as the HEK 293 cell line (extracted from an aborted fetus in 1973) which has been used for decades in flavor research and the development of flavor enhancers for fast food products.
Does thinking about this bother you more than wondering what happened to my appendix after it was removed from my body? Or to my sister's lungs after they were removed? (She's fine, btw, they put new ones in.)
When I was in elementary school in the early 80s, I was about as much of a nerd as I am today. One side effect of this is that I was a voracious reader. In 3rd or 4th grade, most of the kids try to avoid reading as much as possible (at least, they did in rural western Florida), but I absolutely loved the tiny little school library.
Lots of Ramona Quimby and Ralph S. Mouse, of course. And the Hardy Boys. Not exactly heady stuff. Less mainstream stuff like James B. Garfield, too. One book which I remember was "A Bundle of Sticks" by Pat Mauser McCord. This book, which for some reason had not been burned yet, acknowledged the existence of homosexuality, and the word "fаggot."
I read that book at the age of maybe 8 or 9. It did not turn me into a homosexual. In fact, since reading it, I have had sex with fewer than 30 men in my entire life.
When I was in elementary school in the early 80s, I was about as much of a nerd as I am today. One side effect of this is that I was a voracious reader. In 3rd or 4th grade, most of the kids try to avoid reading as much as possible (at least, they did in rural western Florida), but I absolutely loved the tiny little school library.
Lots of Ramona Quimby and Ralph S. Mouse, of course. And the Hardy Boys. Not exactly heady stuff. Less mainstream stuff like James B. Garfield, too. One book which I remember was "A Bundle of Sticks" by Pat Mauser McCord. This book, which for some reason had not been burned yet, acknowledged the existence of homosexuality, and the word "fаggot."
I read that book at the age of maybe 8 or 9. It did not turn me into a homosexual. In fact, since reading it, I have had sex with fewer than 30 men in my entire life.
I, too, have had sex with fewer than 30 men in my life. What a coincidence.
The issue is not the contents, but whether the legal guardian of said 8-9 year old gets to exercise their guardianship over the child rahter than the State, which "technically" is the employee of the taxpayer. The Socialist teacher's union would just love to indoctrinate them all to THEIR norms, with or without our approval. No need to bring up suicide rates of kids with gender dysphoria, although I can see the advertising that the Canadian teacher's union is cooking up...
01-19-2023, 11:46 AM
0
