miataturbo.net-like debauchery thread (about the ND or something)
#3625
I don't think i'm alone in my sentiments.
I did think the ND was good, though. Seats felt decent, steering was good (though crazy light), shifter felt good, brakes felt good, the car FELT way faster than it was, was super fun to go real slow but feel crazy. Stereo was great.
Interior tripped me out.... the windshield felt about 6" away from my forehead. I had plenty of space physically, but it was a weird perception. Car was wide, cabin felt really short front to back. It was like driving a torquey chode.
I did think the ND was good, though. Seats felt decent, steering was good (though crazy light), shifter felt good, brakes felt good, the car FELT way faster than it was, was super fun to go real slow but feel crazy. Stereo was great.
Interior tripped me out.... the windshield felt about 6" away from my forehead. I had plenty of space physically, but it was a weird perception. Car was wide, cabin felt really short front to back. It was like driving a torquey chode.
#3634
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Establish a financing option for sale of such a vehicle as a new car, and you might be surprised.
What price for an ND that kicks ***, takes names, and repeats that process, with the same transmission, over and over,?
Broken **** is broken ****.
I find it somewhat shocking that they are FINALLY listening to the american market, and giving us more power, and yet saying nothing about their current gen transmission which has been shown to be woefully weak with less power.
What price for an ND that kicks ***, takes names, and repeats that process, with the same transmission, over and over,?
Broken **** is broken ****.
I find it somewhat shocking that they are FINALLY listening to the american market, and giving us more power, and yet saying nothing about their current gen transmission which has been shown to be woefully weak with less power.
#3636
FM is making 183 whp on their new ND2 with just a muffler and midpipe change. https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=676090
The first guy to respond, Nataphen, has the hp record for ND1's AFAIK. He is on the Goodwin longtube header and a custom E85 tune, revving to over 7600 and making 180 whp. Yes, different dynos, blah blah.
No one can tune the 19's yet, but those parts gained 16 whp and 8 wtq. I would say the engine is more than a little bit better than the old one, since it is exceeding the factory rating at the wheels, with only two parts. It also makes that power basically at red line.
Once the soft tops become available to test drive somewhere near me, I am definitely trying one out.
The first guy to respond, Nataphen, has the hp record for ND1's AFAIK. He is on the Goodwin longtube header and a custom E85 tune, revving to over 7600 and making 180 whp. Yes, different dynos, blah blah.
No one can tune the 19's yet, but those parts gained 16 whp and 8 wtq. I would say the engine is more than a little bit better than the old one, since it is exceeding the factory rating at the wheels, with only two parts. It also makes that power basically at red line.
Once the soft tops become available to test drive somewhere near me, I am definitely trying one out.
#3638
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,663
Total Cats: 3,012
FM is making 183 whp on their new ND2 with just a muffler and midpipe change. https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=676090
The first guy to respond, Nataphen, has the hp record for ND1's AFAIK. He is on the Goodwin longtube header and a custom E85 tune, revving to over 7600 and making 180 whp. Yes, different dynos, blah blah.
The first guy to respond, Nataphen, has the hp record for ND1's AFAIK. He is on the Goodwin longtube header and a custom E85 tune, revving to over 7600 and making 180 whp. Yes, different dynos, blah blah.