Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 12:44 PM
  #9041  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

you didn't have the valves/seats cut at the shop?
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 12:46 PM
  #9042  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Head went untouched. Budget had to be set somewhere and that was it.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 02:01 PM
  #9043  
wackbards's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,426
Total Cats: 267
From: Seattle
Default

You're going to measure by using some arbitrary thickness but relatively thin shim as a nominal reference, & measure gaps with a feeler, right? I did the same, and a simple excel sheet saved me a ton of time. Make the 1st row for imputing the measured gap. make the 2nd row something like: = your reference shim thickness + (measured gap - desired gap). This should spit out the exact shim thickness you need for that valve as long as none of them need to be thinner than your reference. Better than back 'o napkin math...

also I made the mistake of measuring for shims before I lapped in valves, and it made enough of a difference to matter. My used head was pretty nasty though, so YMMV.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 02:23 PM
  #9044  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Well ****, I'm jealous. That's like $10k in plastic. lol.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 02:30 PM
  #9045  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Wackbard. Did you do it before or after putting the head on the block? Apparently torquing it down can change clearances.

Old Apr 20, 2017 | 02:52 PM
  #9046  
wackbards's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,426
Total Cats: 267
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Wackbard. Did you do it before or after putting the head on the block? Apparently torquing it down can change clearances.
... before... That's the first I've heard of it changing values. I just torqued down the cam caps when I did my measurements. If the values were changing significantly after torqueing down the head, wouldn't that imply that the whole head is flexing significantly when it's torqued to the block? That seems like it would be a design problem beyond just lifter clearance, but I'm just armchairing here.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 03:00 PM
  #9047  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Wackbard. Did you do it before or after putting the head on the block? Apparently torquing it down can change clearances.
Then how would a machine shop ever setup the head?

Originally Posted by wackbards
... before... That's the first I've heard of it changing values. I just torqued down the cam caps when I did my measurements. If the values were changing significantly after torqueing down the head, wouldn't that imply that the whole head is flexing significantly when it's torqued to the block? That seems like it would be a design problem beyond just lifter clearance, but I'm just armchairing here.
Same, make sure you torque per the sequence and use the same torque value each time.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 03:02 PM
  #9048  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I meant clearances on the bench vs on the block.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 03:14 PM
  #9049  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
I meant clearances on the bench vs on the block.
Can't say 100% as I'm still waiting on the stupid little dowels...

I did my valve lash because the shop was taking forever but he didn't mention anything about torquing the head down on the block when checking it. All I had the shop do was clean + recut seats + springs + retainers + seals. He was bitching about having to check/set lash so I paid for work to that point and measured & bought shims.

Hopefully, it'll get put back on the block this weekend. If the dowels show up...
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 03:14 PM
  #9050  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Wackbard. Did you do it before or after putting the head on the block? Apparently torquing it down can change clearances.
Not sure I buy this. Torque plates are used because the bores can twist a little, maybe up to .001" or so, and you want to correct for that. That is a large void across a large distance. The head has a lot more support structure, and you're talking about a much smaller distance the deflection is being measured across, and there is a range of acceptable which is 2-4x that of the range of acceptable bore sizes. IOW, there's no way the clearances change enough to matter.
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 03:22 PM
  #9051  
ridethecliche's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,890
Total Cats: 146
From: New Fucking Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Wackbard. Did you do it before or after putting the head on the block? Apparently torquing it down can change clearances.

Old Apr 20, 2017 | 04:07 PM
  #9052  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

I set the valve lash on the bench, then later checked it on the car. No significant change.

--Ian
Old Apr 20, 2017 | 04:34 PM
  #9053  
wackbards's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,426
Total Cats: 267
From: Seattle
Default

When you go to reassemble the head, I learned a good trick for getting your valve keepers back in: position the keepers with the spring uncompressed, slip a Ziploc bag over the top of the keepers, then compress the spring. The bag gets pinned by the spring compressor, and the tension of the plastic on the keepers nudges them right into place. you can get them to seat in about 5 seconds. Totally awesome hack.
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 12:39 AM
  #9054  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Head is assembled. I have lots of pictures. Also started on the block. Can someone confirm these shims for me? Or suggest improvements? I'll place the order in the morning if I can find all of them.



I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 01:02 AM
  #9055  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Looks plausible to me. The spreadsheet I used is here:

http://www.codrus.com/miata/fm2r/valves-2014-2.xlsx

It's essentially the same, although I put more of the intermediate numbers on there and I only did intake (machine shop had done exhaust when they cleaned up the head).

--Ian
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 03:42 AM
  #9056  
icantlearn's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,939
Total Cats: 118
From: San Jose, CA
Default


Im just over here takin notes and trying to learn.
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 07:47 AM
  #9057  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,408
Total Cats: 316
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Head is assembled. I have lots of pictures. Also started on the block. Can someone confirm these shims for me? Or suggest improvements? I'll place the order in the morning if I can find all of them.



I just stacked feeler gauges. So there is a good chance these are wrong. But its worth a shot.
I'd try remeasuring with a 1.3 shim to allow minimum feeler gauge stackup then order the rest.

I realize you want to get it done...
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 08:03 AM
  #9058  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
I'd try remeasuring with a 1.3 shim to allow minimum feeler gauge stackup then order the rest.

I realize you want to get it done...
I'm going to do this when the shims come in. But I'd rather give it a shot. Doesn't hurt to have extra shims.
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 11:57 AM
  #9059  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
I'm going to do this when the shims come in. But I'd rather give it a shot. Doesn't hurt to have extra shims.
This is a money vs time tradeoff, yes.

--Ian
Old Apr 21, 2017 | 12:03 PM
  #9060  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default



I'm going to assume high performance racing means like actual high performance racing. Not BP things.

So my bore is 3.3084".

Top ring: .0165 ≈ .017"
2nd ring: .0182 ≈ 0.19" (rounding up because bigger is better?)
Oil rail: .0496???

Should the oil rail gap be that much bigger than the ring gap?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.