Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap
IIRC, the "ABS" light is for flashing diagnostic codes, the "BRAKE" light is for indicating that there's a code present. They probably could have gotten away with just one light, but it's Bosch and you know what the Germans are like. 
--Ian

--Ian
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Interesting. Because when I have a code in the system, the abs light was on, but the brake light wasn't. I guess I'll wire em both up.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Ed got me started rewatching my MRLS video, and my brown pants incident
Definitely was not pointed the right way here.

Happens at 2:10
Definitely was not pointed the right way here.

Happens at 2:10
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Best instructor ever 
To be fair, she was right, I implemented her suggestion horribly.
There was a wall on both sides, no giving up.

To be fair, she was right, I implemented her suggestion horribly.
There was a wall on both sides, no giving up.
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
lol but that's not the video with your 'instructor'
and yes, can't give up there
and yes, can't give up there
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Suggestions for ride height? Xida 700/400, RB tubular, NA susp all around, extended lower ball joints, r package tie rods.
Thinking 4.25/4.5?
Maybe 4/4.25?
Thinking 4.25/4.5?
Maybe 4/4.25?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
I don't think I could get -1.4* camber if I tried with the extended LBJ.
I want a mix of the 2nd and 3rd. Not a full on race alignment, more like a mostly track but drive to work a lot alignment.
Thinking 4.25/4.5 ride height. -3* camber front -2.7* rear.
Any objections?
I want a mix of the 2nd and 3rd. Not a full on race alignment, more like a mostly track but drive to work a lot alignment.
Thinking 4.25/4.5 ride height. -3* camber front -2.7* rear.
Any objections?
It can depending on the tire material, I've never had inner edges go bald though. The grip > unnoticed tire wear IMO. The rear toe is to keep the angle of thrust pointed like a rocket gimbal. I suggest a 1/8" toe-in in the rear. This has the 'power' from the tires making a / \ pattern. At least for me, it helps control throttle oversteer by spreading the angle of thrust wider, I spin out less on hard corners when on the throttle.
Don't go too low though, the bumpsteer sucks (as well as burying your lip and bottoming out on speed bumps :-(). The 93le tie rod ends and nb subframe I installed helps a lot though.
Don't go too low though, the bumpsteer sucks (as well as burying your lip and bottoming out on speed bumps :-(). The 93le tie rod ends and nb subframe I installed helps a lot though.
Martin what are Laz's alignment specs?
0 toe in the front will in practice result in just a smidge of toe out when the car is rolling iirc.
I agree on the 1/8 toe in for the rear, especially for non-stock-hp miatas.
0 toe in the front will in practice result in just a smidge of toe out when the car is rolling iirc.
I agree on the 1/8 toe in for the rear, especially for non-stock-hp miatas.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
I have 93le tie rod ends. No nb subframe. I think I was at 4.5-4.75 on bilsteins, so .25" lower won't hurt much. Bumpsteer wasn't bad with the stock tie rod ends.







