Yet Another Gun Thread
#5962
PSA .300BLK pistol kit
Just add the lower of your choice. I built one of these last spring and have been pretty pleased with it.
Be careful with "suppressor" (solvent trap/ storage, etc) kits... if you can shoot through it, you may be walking a fine line with regard to contstructive possession. You can get a "barrel extension" or "flash can", but it won't be something that is easily made into a suppressor.
The good news is Form 1 E files are about the quickest stamp you can get right now.
Just add the lower of your choice. I built one of these last spring and have been pretty pleased with it.
Be careful with "suppressor" (solvent trap/ storage, etc) kits... if you can shoot through it, you may be walking a fine line with regard to contstructive possession. You can get a "barrel extension" or "flash can", but it won't be something that is easily made into a suppressor.
The good news is Form 1 E files are about the quickest stamp you can get right now.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...ve-pistol.html
My first thoughts on solvent trap was "screw em", I'm not doing anything illegal but will have to read up on it. Thanks for the heads up on "quickest stamp". I don't like the precedent that the Trump administration set with the bumpstock ban. If they outlaw something else I legally purchase I am just going to flip. FWIW, I traded my last bumpstock for a $100 winning lottery ticket. I was going to bury it in the back yard for when the boogaloo hits but decided against it. I'm too old to fight the system.
#5964
Hmm, I have not done enough research on 300 ACC to know if that 10.5" kit is better than this 8.5" complete rifle (bullet drop, etc). Also, when I finally do put a can on it I don't want it to be too front heavy.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...ve-pistol.html
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...ve-pistol.html
If talking "toy", with supers, you're probably not gonna notice a significant drop difference until well outside 200yds... probably more like 250. Likely not going to be shooting subs past 100yds, so whatevs.
If hunting, the problem with 300blk subs is bullet expansion... extremely limited supply of 200+grain .30cal bullets that will expand. Hornady, Lehigh Defense, Cavity Back.. a few others, but EXPENSIVE.
My first thoughts on solvent trap was "screw em", I'm not doing anything illegal but will have to read up on it. Thanks for the heads up on "quickest stamp". I don't like the precedent that the Trump administration set with the bumpstock ban. If they outlaw something else I legally purchase I am just going to flip. FWIW, I traded my last bumpstock for a $100 winning lottery ticket. I was going to bury it in the back yard for when the boogaloo hits but decided against it. I'm too old to fight the system.
#5966
PSA .300BLK pistol kit
Just add the lower of your choice. I built one of these last spring and have been pretty pleased with it.
Be careful with "suppressor" (solvent trap/ storage, etc) kits... if you can shoot through it, you may be walking a fine line with regard to contstructive possession. You can get a "barrel extension" or "flash can", but it won't be something that is easily made into a suppressor.
The good news is Form 1 E files are about the quickest stamp you can get right now.
Just add the lower of your choice. I built one of these last spring and have been pretty pleased with it.
Be careful with "suppressor" (solvent trap/ storage, etc) kits... if you can shoot through it, you may be walking a fine line with regard to contstructive possession. You can get a "barrel extension" or "flash can", but it won't be something that is easily made into a suppressor.
The good news is Form 1 E files are about the quickest stamp you can get right now.
+ $85 toolcraft bolt carrier group.
#5967
Damn, that seems expensive for just a toy compared to https://www.deltateamtactical.com/Da...rd_p_7944.html
+ $85 toolcraft bolt carrier group.
+ $85 toolcraft bolt carrier group.
Pretty much a wash, really, when you consider the different components.
#5969
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,602
Total Cats: 1,264
I have been shopping for a 1911 for some time now. The ones I really want (like Kimber) are premium models and therefore command a premium price. Some of the cheaper options are sloppy at best. I even looked at several used ones, and at least one was so loose that the slide rattled!
So, as a hobby machinist, I decided it was time to build my own, to make the fits as nice as the better examples out there, without the matching price tag. Time is of no consequence, and if it takes me several years, that is just fine. Just as a point of reference, this will not be for carry, but simply a backup woods gun when I'm hunting and a casual shooter/plinker other times.
As a result, I have been shopping the various frame manufacturers. Aluminum, stainless steel, plain steel, steel with polymer grip/mag well; and that's just the materials. Front grip already checkered or DIY, frame size, etc. The options are somewhat bewildering. I like the idea of aluminum for easier gunsmithing, but am somewhat concerned for strength and/or service life due to fatigue. Thoughts and opinions will be welcome.
So, has anyone built one of these? Which manufacturer/vendor did you go with, and would you use them again? Parts kits (Rock Island, for example) can be bought complete, or each component can be purchased separately. Recommendations for going either route?
So, as a hobby machinist, I decided it was time to build my own, to make the fits as nice as the better examples out there, without the matching price tag. Time is of no consequence, and if it takes me several years, that is just fine. Just as a point of reference, this will not be for carry, but simply a backup woods gun when I'm hunting and a casual shooter/plinker other times.
As a result, I have been shopping the various frame manufacturers. Aluminum, stainless steel, plain steel, steel with polymer grip/mag well; and that's just the materials. Front grip already checkered or DIY, frame size, etc. The options are somewhat bewildering. I like the idea of aluminum for easier gunsmithing, but am somewhat concerned for strength and/or service life due to fatigue. Thoughts and opinions will be welcome.
So, has anyone built one of these? Which manufacturer/vendor did you go with, and would you use them again? Parts kits (Rock Island, for example) can be bought complete, or each component can be purchased separately. Recommendations for going either route?
#5970
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,178
Total Cats: 1,681
I have been shopping for a 1911 for some time now. The ones I really want (like Kimber) are premium models and therefore command a premium price. Some of the cheaper options are sloppy at best. I even looked at several used ones, and at least one was so loose that the slide rattled!
So, as a hobby machinist, I decided it was time to build my own, to make the fits as nice as the better examples out there, without the matching price tag. Time is of no consequence, and if it takes me several years, that is just fine. Just as a point of reference, this will not be for carry, but simply a backup woods gun when I'm hunting and a casual shooter/plinker other times.
As a result, I have been shopping the various frame manufacturers. Aluminum, stainless steel, plain steel, steel with polymer grip/mag well; and that's just the materials. Front grip already checkered or DIY, frame size, etc. The options are somewhat bewildering. I like the idea of aluminum for easier gunsmithing, but am somewhat concerned for strength and/or service life due to fatigue. Thoughts and opinions will be welcome.
So, has anyone built one of these? Which manufacturer/vendor did you go with, and would you use them again? Parts kits (Rock Island, for example) can be bought complete, or each component can be purchased separately. Recommendations for going either route?
So, as a hobby machinist, I decided it was time to build my own, to make the fits as nice as the better examples out there, without the matching price tag. Time is of no consequence, and if it takes me several years, that is just fine. Just as a point of reference, this will not be for carry, but simply a backup woods gun when I'm hunting and a casual shooter/plinker other times.
As a result, I have been shopping the various frame manufacturers. Aluminum, stainless steel, plain steel, steel with polymer grip/mag well; and that's just the materials. Front grip already checkered or DIY, frame size, etc. The options are somewhat bewildering. I like the idea of aluminum for easier gunsmithing, but am somewhat concerned for strength and/or service life due to fatigue. Thoughts and opinions will be welcome.
So, has anyone built one of these? Which manufacturer/vendor did you go with, and would you use them again? Parts kits (Rock Island, for example) can be bought complete, or each component can be purchased separately. Recommendations for going either route?
Once I get my Bridgeport in a bit you can swing down to Charleston with the wife in the winter for vacation and I can let you do some work if you want.
#5971
I'd prefer a steel or stainless frame since it can be left raw or easily black oxided, blued, or even cerecoated (with the rails masked). Aluminum will need to be hard coat anodized for the rails.
You would be surprised at how many companies, even premium brands, buy 80% frames from Dassan with the completed barrels coming from the same place.
You would be surprised at how many companies, even premium brands, buy 80% frames from Dassan with the completed barrels coming from the same place.
#5972
I have been shopping for a 1911 for some time now. The ones I really want (like Kimber) are premium models and therefore command a premium price. Some of the cheaper options are sloppy at best. I even looked at several used ones, and at least one was so loose that the slide rattled!
Some of us are old enough to remember when most 1911s rattled.... In fact, I've fired more than a couple 1911s that were great shooters and sounded like tambourines...
I've had several Kimbers over the years, both good and not so good. Still have two, both older production, that are good shooters. These days, I wouldn't pay the premium as I don't think they're up to their price point. Springfield Range Officer, and Loaded are really good at the price point. I've almost bought a Range Officer Elite, on a couple of occasions, but I'm holding out for another TRP. I'm still kicking myself for getting rid of the one I had. The Rugers are also a pretty good value, especially if you can pick one up used. They're nothing special, but well made.
So, as a hobby machinist, I decided it was time to build my own... So, has anyone built one of these? Which manufacturer/vendor did you go with, and would you use them again? Parts kits (Rock Island, for example) can be bought complete, or each component can be purchased separately. Recommendations for going either route?
I haven't personally built up a 1911 in many years, but a friend who's more plugged in has good things to say about the Caspian frames/slides. If you're building a shooter, steel. If it's a carry gun, aluminum. Race gun, go double stack polymer. Parts 'kits', usually contain the lowest common denominator parts, not something I'd want building a 1911. I've had the pleasure of being acquainted with some top flight 1911 builders over the years, and building one is not nearly as 'paint by the numbers' as building something like an AR. Do your research before diving in...
On another note... getting irritated with PSA. Ordered a gun over a week ago, and it still hasn't shipped.
#5973
I'm thinking a shorty 300 AAC pistol with stabilizing brace... I don't think I have the dies to make 300 AAC so I will be in the market for those as well. I'll have to build some jigs for my laser to engrave the lower and the can. I'll also have to blow the dust off my lathe for the suppressor build. This sounds like it will be a fun project.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...165490427.html
#5977
All joking aside, over 40 years of shooting has taught me that quality among tier 1 manufacturers is roughly equivalent across the board. All of them occasionaly pop out a turd, but aside from preferring particular design elements, qualitiy is really pretty good.
#5978
Yea need a license to purchase here in mass.
The one I was looking at was just physically larger, and holds 3 less rounds than the p365. plus it takes a few months for my order to come in vs the hour drive to get the sig lol.
Aren't even close, in what? Clunky ergonomics? High bore axis?
All joking aside, over 40 years of shooting has taught me that quality among tier 1 manufacturers is roughly equivalent across the board. All of them occasionaly pop out a turd, but aside from preferring particular design elements, qualitiy is really pretty good.
All joking aside, over 40 years of shooting has taught me that quality among tier 1 manufacturers is roughly equivalent across the board. All of them occasionaly pop out a turd, but aside from preferring particular design elements, qualitiy is really pretty good.
#5979
Engraving completed on the 80% lower. No one at the range will understand it but I am giggling like a little girl... I also got my Form 1 approved yesterday and ordered my solvent filter kit. 1.5 x 1.36 @ 8". Two stainless cups and 5 titanium cups. Will direct mount the titanium tube. This project is starting to come together.
#5980
Engraving completed on the 80% lower. No one at the range will understand it but I am giggling like a little girl... I also got my Form 1 approved yesterday and ordered my solvent filter kit. 1.5 x 1.36 @ 8". Two stainless cups and 5 titanium cups. Will direct mount the titanium tube. This project is starting to come together.
ATF approved a bunch of Individual Form 4s in ~60 days from early August, but it appears it was a deliberate attempt to fudge their average approval times, which they've been getting flak for.