Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:05 PM
  #5241  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Its going to be straight into the AFPR. Which will be chassis mounted.

Looking at this doc: https://www.swagelok.com/downloads/W.../MS-01-140.pdf

The pressure fittings are rated to the working pressure of the tube (page 9)

I can get -500-6-5AN (page 19) which is a 5/16 tube to Male 5an. Then a simple 5an female to 6an male and were good to go. Need to call a distributor and get a price.

Then I dont have to **** around with flaring and stuff.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:06 PM
  #5242  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 206
From: Kansas
Default

I very much hate those fittings. The necked diameter next to the large shoulder means they snap off in your block oil feed port.

Originally Posted by codrus
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:07 PM
  #5243  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by deezums
Thats different than what he posted. You linked to a tube fitting, like the PDF I linked to

Originally Posted by codrus
I need 1/8NPT. I might do that too though. Still shopping.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:09 PM
  #5244  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 206
From: Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Thats different than what he posted. You linked to a tube fitting, like the PDF I linked to
So it is.

I'd still use that one over the male/female adapter you linked. AN fittings probably don't need the thread relief the M10 does, but it's still a very shittty weak fitting IMO.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:09 PM
  #5245  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default


Attached Thumbnails Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap-8agfvsi.png   Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap-hf9vnrw.png  
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #5246  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Originally Posted by deezums
So it is.

I'd still use that one over the male/female adapter you linked. AN fittings probably don't need the thread relief the M10 does, but it's still a very shittty weak fitting IMO.
What male/female adapter? The one ian linked?
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #5247  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 206
From: Kansas
Default

Yeah.

Seeing the picture of the swagelock, it probably doesn't matter. It has a weak center no matter if it's male or female.

With the need for the through hole, combined with the thread relief cut right into the shoulder (can't turn complete threads against such a tall shoulder) means you get a really weak shear point.



Old Nov 26, 2015 | 01:24 PM
  #5248  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Then there is this if I can't find the swaglok fitting.

www.ka-t.org ? View topic - How to *properly* run AN fittings with stock fuel lines
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 04:36 PM
  #5249  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by deezums
I very much hate those fittings. The necked diameter next to the large shoulder means they snap off in your block oil feed port.
Why would you screw an AN male thread into a block oil feed port?

I have a couple of these fittings, but I use them to put a pressure sender on the chassis and run an AN line to them. Like this:



There shouldn't be any significant load on the fitting in this application.

--Ian
Attached Thumbnails Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap-fuel-pressure-sender.jpg  
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #5250  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Does that fitting have a flat spot for an o-ring? It needs to seal against the block.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 05:29 PM
  #5251  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Does that fitting have a flat spot for an o-ring? It needs to seal against the block.
Are you asking me? Which block? Neither end is the right threads for the engine block -- do you mean the FPR housing?

I dunno if it's got an O-ring spot or not. Here's a slightly different angle shot:



--Ian
Attached Thumbnails Aidan's loose oily bunghole actually runs a track lap-fuel-pressure-bits1.jpg  
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 06:51 PM
  #5252  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Sorry, I meant seal against the afpr. See my picture a page back.

Before I dig into all this. How much fuel/hp can the stock 5/16 line support.

[Utag]patsmx5[/utag] are you running stock headlines?
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 06:54 PM
  #5253  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

I run 6AN feed and return. No stock lines.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 07:01 PM
  #5254  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Damn, you too?
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 07:15 PM
  #5255  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I know we discussed it in Gs thread at some point.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 07:54 PM
  #5256  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,298
Total Cats: 884
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

IIRC, stock 5/16 lines are good for 300-400 on gasoline. You really only *need* -6 on a Miata if you're running E85.

(edit: with a turbo. supercharger may well be different due to parasitic losses)

--Ian
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:02 PM
  #5257  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

Yank is running 350 on e85 an stock lines I believe. Isn't the tank outlet 5/16 anyways?
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:10 PM
  #5258  
patsmx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,406
Total Cats: 559
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by aidandj
Damn, you too?
I did it because I wanted to overdo it so I wouldn't have to worry about a weak link in my fuel system. I have a fairly ridiculous fuel system in this car, although I am running E85. Twin 255's, 2 relays w/10 gauge wires, 6AN, regulator in the engine bay, ID1000's at 60 PSI and 1:1 referenced. Basically a few months ago I got tired of upgrading things and not doing it "enough", so now whenever I upgrade something, I go ahead and do it all-out with the idea being it's the last time I have to mess with it.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:36 PM
  #5259  
aidandj's Avatar
Thread Starter
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,643
Total Cats: 1,870
From: Beaverton, USA
Default

I think I'm going to leave the stock line for now. I'll have it set up with AN6 everywhere after the hard-line so it will be really easy to add an AN line later.
Old Nov 26, 2015 | 08:48 PM
  #5260  
hi_im_sean's Avatar
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by patsmx5
I did it because I wanted to overdo it so I wouldn't have to worry about a weak link in my fuel system. I have a fairly ridiculous fuel system in this car, although I am running E85. Twin 255's, 2 relays w/10 gauge wires, 6AN, regulator in the engine bay, ID1000's at 60 PSI and 1:1 referenced. Basically a few months ago I got tired of upgrading things and not doing it "enough", so now whenever I upgrade something, I go ahead and do it all-out with the idea being it's the last time I have to mess with it.
I, for one, approve of this type of thinking. Although, I usually cant afford it...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.