Honest question: When you hear someone giving information from various supposed professionals--even in French--do you consider it a "tissue or a baggie" moment for the information?

Do you think there are nanoparticles in the Pfizer shot?

I don't have enough information, but it's certainly concerning. If it's happening, who are you going to trust to get to the bottom of it?

 

We are already drinking from a firehose of chemicals without informed consent at this point. Adding layers of possible danger or even uncertainty sounds undesirable.

Furniture and carpets are soaked in carcinogens to keep cigarette smokers from burning their houses down. How about those who are not cigarette smokers? Can I buy a chemical-free sofa with soft padding and fabric? Maybe if I have one custom made? Or a mattress? Or a pillow? Don't remove this tag under penalty of law.

New car smell and the chemical soaked trees people hang from rear view mirrors are supposedly endocrine disruptors at best and toxic or carcinogenic at worst. Fabric softeners, artificial fragrances, and the xenoestrogens in shampoos, conditioners, lotions, and soaps are bombarding us with compounds our livers and endocrine systems aren't prepared to metabolize.

Twenty years ago my father mused, "Humans are the only animals that build their own traps."

 

Remember "breast milk is not good for babies, give them formula instead"? Ooops, here's a $20 check from the class action lawsuit mam.

Shoulda known better than to trust a Vulcan. They're not human, they can't be reasoned with.

 

I suspect that you and I may not have the same impression of what a "tissue or baggie moment" means.

When I hear someone giving information which they claim to be either true or false, I tend to be especially critical of those claims, and to seek out context for understanding the background and motivation of the speaker, when the claims seem to be of an extremist or absolutist nature, or expressed from a position of "I am delivering this great revelation to you." Examples of this would be:

‎
‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ • "This information is absolutely true, and no one should question it."

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ • "Here is evidence of a massive collusion between parties."

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ • "This politician or political party is acting in the best interest of the people."

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ • "The cake is a lie."

 

Of course. Lipid-based nanoparticles are a common delivery vehicle for nucleic acids, and are widely used in mRNA-based vaccines. Both Moderna and Pfizer–BioNTech have published papers detailing their use in this specific context.

If someone who claims to be a medical researcher is just now discovering this for the first time, that pretty much instantly removes all credibility from what they have to say, in my opinion.

 

The man in the video mentioned graphene, inorganic compounds, components not on the list of "official" components that were supposed to be in the vaccine, including heavy metals.

Just like the "baggie or tissue?" question, I don't begrudge anyone the choice to decide whether the "white thing" is nefarious or innocent. Crazy thing is I thought it was interesting and wanted to hear what others thought.

People don't always see things the same way, and that's fine by me.

 

@levnubhin

 

The man in the video (whose name is Amar Goudjil, more on him later) also stated that "... vaccinated individuals were becoming almost all electromagnetic"


Now, one question which I would ask is: how does a living organism exhibit electromagnetism? I don't mean "how is that possible," I mean "what the heck does that even mean?" Was a doctor passing electric current through their bodies while measuring their flux with a gauss meter? (This is sarcasm)

Or did he mean that the patients were becoming responsive to external magnetic forces, and was just using a big, complicated word which he doesn't understand.

I suspect that the latter is true. There is at least some evidence for this phenomenon occurring in animals.


But either way, here's the catch... graphene is intrinsically nonmagnetic.


You want to know what IS intrinsically magnetic?


Blood.


You know how nutritionists talk about iron-rich foods like legumes and shellfish? Yeah, same stuff that bridges and skillets are made of.

The average human body contains 40 to 50 mg per kg of iron, which amounts to about 4 grams for a 180 lb adult male. About 80% of this is in the blood, and not having enough of it is called anemia, which is a fancy word for "your blood can't carry enough oxygen to your cells to keep you alive."

Your blood is very weakly magnetic, regardless of whether you've gotten the jabs or not. The treasurer for a political lobbyist group performing a parlor trick for a few random individuals on the street in Luxembourg does not change this. If people's blood were becoming sufficiently magnetic that any sort of hand-held magnet which you can possibly imagine would stick to the skin of a recently vaccinated person, we'd be hearing about hundreds of thousands of people being torn limb from limb inside of MRI machines each year.


(briefly scans the news)


Nope, that hasn't been happening.

 

Related factoid: I have to carry a card in my wallet detailing all the stents and coils inside me used to repair my aortic aneurism. It's not enough to set off a metal detector, but it is enough to cause what they call "artifacts" whenever I have a CT scan. if I have to have an MRI, I need to inform the operators to keep the machine below a certain level to avoid dislodging the microscopic bits. This would be very bad for me.

 

Science fiction is often more exciting than science.

 

This is true.

 

I wonder if he meant the "heavy metals" part of the vaccine. And by "heavy metals", I wonder if he meant thimerosal?

Regardless of whether I turn "magnetic" or not, I won't be taking a Covid booster anytime soon...

 

Not politics, real laboratory science:

https://open.substack.com/pub/peterm...-shots-destroy

BREAKING: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Destroy Over 60% of Women's Non-Renewable Egg Supply

The study titled, Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve, was recently published in the journal Vaccines.

-Rats injected intramuscularly with a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine -- at a human-equivalent dose -- experienced a >60% reduction in primordial follicles, the foundational egg supply for future fertility (p < 0.001).

-The inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) also caused loss, but to a lesser extent.

-The primordial follicle pool is finite and non-regenerating -- females are born with all the eggs they will ever have.


-Destruction of this pool is irreversible, leading to permanent fertility loss if translated to humans.

-AMH, a hormone reflecting ovarian reserve, dropped significantly in the mRNA group -- both in serum and in ovarian tissue (p < 0.001).

-Increased expression of caspase-3 (a cell-death enzyme) and inflammatory markers like TGF-?1 and VEGF were found in vaccinated rats. These biomarkers are linked to ovarian atresia, fibrosis, and long-term tissue damage.

-Compared to the inactivated vaccine, the mRNA group had:

Fewer growing follicles (primary, secondary, antral, preovulatory)

More dying follicles (atretic)

Greater reductions in hormone markers of fertility

-If these findings indeed apply to humans, the implications for global fertility rates are profound. This kind of damage -- to a woman's lifelong egg supply -- is biologically irreversible.

Unfortunately, a recent study by Manniche et al indicates that these ovarian reserve destruction findings likely DO translate to humans. Among ~1.3 million Czech women aged 18-39, those vaccinated against COVID-19 had ~33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to unvaccinated women.

Ovarian damage likely occurs because the lipid nanoparticles encapsulating the mRNA have a particular preference for the ovaries, according to an Australian TGA report.

 

 

did you read that hes getting ousted as the DNC vp chair because he didn't meet their diversity quotas?

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/0...-post-00343653

 

Working as intended then? Depopulation was the goal of covid was it not?

:(

 

Only the non-working class. In china it was the tribal communities. In the US it was intended to be a punishment, but our government excepted the outcome because it affected minorities and social security recipients.

 

We also ignored all the miscarriages the clot shot caused too...

 

Regarding today's news headlines about the former First Prostate...

You'd think that the President of the United States would be one of the most-well-cared-for people on earth, in terms of having access to medical care and screening, routine doctors' examinations, etc.

In that context, it is interesting how no one noticed that President Biden was suffering from a fairy serious cancer until he was out of office, out of contention for re-election, and indeed just a couple of days away from the release of a book describing in some detail the ways in which the White House covered up the decline of Biden's health and faculties during his time in office.

 

I’m sure they knew a long time ago about the cancer. His declining mental capacity just got in the way of the plan. The plan was to be re-elected, hold out as long as possible hopefully over 2yrs and then give it to harris.