The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,416
Total Cats: 7,532
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,564
Total Cats: 4,370
From: Chantilly, VA
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,564
Total Cats: 4,370
From: Chantilly, VA
https://x.com/tonyxtwo/status/1939515367803727970?s=51
TONYxTWO (@TONY™) posted: “So it looks like a Missouri pharmacist might have just blown the auto pen scandal wide open.”
TONYxTWO (@TONY™) posted: “So it looks like a Missouri pharmacist might have just blown the auto pen scandal wide open.”
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,416
Total Cats: 7,532
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
That will never happen for two main reasons. First, there's no way to hide the pork in a single issue bill, but probably more importantly, multi-issue bills give the politicians an out. For example, Congressman Fucknutz didn't vote to deport illegal aliens that commit violent sex crimes because the bill had a provision that would negatively affect EV sales in his district.
We The People should push for a referendum for single issue bills. I believe it would be a game changer.
We The People should push for a referendum for single issue bills. I believe it would be a game changer.
Because nukes have "signatures". If Russia sold them one, and they used it, we'd know where it came from.
No country is willing to risk so much for a **** country like Iran.
No country is willing to risk so much for a **** country like Iran.
Exactly the correct answer. We know if they had one, they'd use it. So why is ANYONE pissed the strike happened?
I can follow your logic there.
Now, who would they use it on? And would they think that person wouldn't return the favor with the same weapon, of which they likely have more of, and likely even more powerful?
Or do they think the nuked party would just tuck their tails between their legs and run to the international police with a grievance?
Remember, Iran, after getting blasted by the US reportedly told the US about their planned retaliation just so, you know, they would know it wasn't an actual retaliation.
Now, who would they use it on? And would they think that person wouldn't return the favor with the same weapon, of which they likely have more of, and likely even more powerful?
Or do they think the nuked party would just tuck their tails between their legs and run to the international police with a grievance?
Remember, Iran, after getting blasted by the US reportedly told the US about their planned retaliation just so, you know, they would know it wasn't an actual retaliation.
I don't believe you can. Yet.
Israel is the "Little Satan", and we are the "Big Satan". Their religion would reward them for the large scale killing of either of us. The mullahs don't care about their own Iranian population. They don't care about retaliation.
As a tangent to this conversation, read the Hamas Charter. It's an easy find on the google machine. It pretty much lays out where the Iranian mullahs are.
Israel is the "Little Satan", and we are the "Big Satan". Their religion would reward them for the large scale killing of either of us. The mullahs don't care about their own Iranian population. They don't care about retaliation.
As a tangent to this conversation, read the Hamas Charter. It's an easy find on the google machine. It pretty much lays out where the Iranian mullahs are.
Energy defines a countries wealth. We do not want Iran to become a major power financially and especially with the bomb. Would they use it, probably not because of the collateral damage to neighboring countries. Would they threaten to use it, definitely.
I follow what you're saying, it's not a thought I haven't had myself.
If this were the case, they would be invading Israel right now.
I'm not saying I'm some kind of expert in world politics or Islamic regimes. I'm just looking at the broad view here and doing some basic history. It's a lot of bla bla bla and a whole bunch of terrorist actions. Kinda like our own political theater here in the States.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,564
Total Cats: 4,370
From: Chantilly, VA
...so long as some unelected Biden staffer doesn't remove all those things because they can.
otherwise, he can never get 60 votes on a bill that says: 1 + 1 = 2.








