Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

The AI-generated cat pictures thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:32 PM
  #24921  
TrickerZ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 857
Total Cats: 21
From: Cocoa Beach, FL
Default

Rode this today

Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:37 PM
  #24922  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Old Jul 10, 2015 | 01:57 PM
  #24923  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Reminds me of the ship's mechanic in Alien Resurrection.


Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-80-f2db79q_b4a64a041a32110031b1dcb3d1e7d5b69677afc6.jpg  
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 03:46 PM
  #24924  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by TrickerZ
Rode this today

-ferrari coaster-
Great Adventure is right by me so I've been on Kingda ka a bunch of times. not as quick as the Ferrari coaster but pulls a little more G's on launch. These hydraulic launch coasters are no joke. It pulls pretty good, levels off, then pulls harder towards the end. OOOfff.




There's now a free fall on the Kingda Ka tower...haven't done that one yet.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 01:12 AM
  #24925  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

https://www.facebook.com/edm/videos/vb.364244193645243/689524264450566
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 03:27 AM
  #24926  
kenzo42's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,017
Total Cats: 13
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
How do all mechanics not have back problems? Leaning over into the engine bay for even an hour kills my lower back.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 10:51 AM
  #24927  
oilstain's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 836
Total Cats: 76
From: Phoenix
Default

Originally Posted by kenzo42
How do all mechanics not have back problems? Leaning over into the engine bay for even an hour kills my lower back.
This is the problem I expected to see fixed in that video, essentially a SuperMan rig that attaches to an engine hoist. Know that stupid little coolant hose that attaches to the back of the engine? Ha, I'm flying now, you ******!
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 11:56 AM
  #24928  
mgeoffriau's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
From: Jackson, MS
Default

Old Jul 11, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #24929  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 22,204
Total Cats: 3,560
From: Tampa, Florida
Default The Random Pictures Thread. Only Rule: Post here more and entertain me.

ouch
Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-20150711_154241.jpg   The AI-generated cat pictures thread-20150711_154259.jpg  
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 10:39 PM
  #24930  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
...not as quick as the Ferrari coaster but pulls a little more G's on launch. These hydraulic launch coasters are no joke. It pulls pretty good, levels off, then pulls harder towards the end...
I'd love to go one one of these coasters that advertise how "fast" they are and compare them to a catapult shot off an aircraft carrier.

I know that even slower aircraft (like the Hawkeye that I fly) compare to the acceleration curve of a top-fuel dragster, but it's every little nuance that changes the experience.

I've got a feeling that the new magnetic catapults are gonna be "*****-speed" compared to the steam stuff of old.
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 10:52 PM
  #24931  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
I'd love to go one one of these coasters that advertise how "fast" they are and compare them to a catapult shot off an aircraft carrier.
This one (which hasn't yet been constructed) claims to sustain +10g for 60 seconds:



Yes, the whole point of it is to kill the rider. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_Coaster




Originally Posted by samnavy
I've got a feeling that the new magnetic catapults are gonna be "*****-speed" compared to the steam stuff of old.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were engineered to produce a linear acceleration, achieving the same velocity at the end of the stroke, but with lower peak impulse. Decreased stress on the airframes (and the nose gear), and probably more energy-efficient as well.




Also, this is apparently a real thing:

Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-44093_euthanasia_coaster_at_human.jpg  
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 11:22 PM
  #24932  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,463
Total Cats: 327
From: VaBch, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
This one (which hasn't yet been constructed) claims to sustain +10g for 60 seconds:

I wouldn't be surprised if they were engineered to produce a linear acceleration, achieving the same velocity at the end of the stroke, but with lower peak impulse. Decreased stress on the airframes (and the nose gear), and probably more energy-efficient as well.
I've been exposed to 6 G's transient in a Tomcat and a 7 G momentary in a Hornet... both experiences were not fun. 10 G's are not something that the human body can sustain with useful consciousness for more than a few seconds without a lot of preparation/anticipation. and even then.

As for carrier launches... steam catapults are not very good at "progressive" advance of acceleration. I'm a former flight deck officer and have personal experience at this. When the steam hits the piston, it's all or nothing... from the pilots seat, it feels list 0-40 is instantaneous, and the 40-140 takes another 2-3 seconds. I'm not kidding... by the seat-of-the-pants, it feels like the plane slams you in the back at 50mph and THEN accelerates to launch speed. Catapult launches are not pleasant.
Old Jul 12, 2015 | 08:47 AM
  #24933  
shooterschmidty's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 320
Total Cats: 14
From: Dayton, OH
Default

The F-16 centrifuge profile peaks at 9 G's for 15 seconds with an onset rate of 8 G's/second if I recall correctly. It definitely isn't pleasant, but it's a really cool experience. It's very unique, and a little creepy, to watch your field of view shrink as you try to force more blood to your head.
Old Jul 12, 2015 | 09:41 AM
  #24934  
TrickerZ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 857
Total Cats: 21
From: Cocoa Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Also, this is apparently a real thing:

Turbo + alternator for a hybrid?
Old Jul 12, 2015 | 10:40 AM
  #24935  
hi_im_sean's Avatar
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,143
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Default

This is incredible, how have we not known this?




Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-80-10665825_10152995262378929_9206505649420980930_n_63766fe0d196d73b61f142d12dcae8842379ef7c.jpg   The AI-generated cat pictures thread-80-racecar_spelled_backwards_is_racecar_t_shirts_r41b22967437c4760a4fcb1048808d349_i3rmy_1024_07.jpg  
Old Jul 12, 2015 | 11:02 AM
  #24936  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,402
Total Cats: 7,523
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
I've been exposed to 6 G's transient in a Tomcat and a 7 G momentary in a Hornet... both experiences were not fun. 10 G's are not something that the human body can sustain with useful consciousness for more than a few seconds without a lot of preparation/anticipation. and even then.
As per the link I posted, that specific coaster is intended to kill the rider. Hence the name "Euthanasia Coaster."


Originally Posted by samnavy
As for carrier launches... steam catapults are not very good at "progressive" advance of acceleration. I'm a former flight deck officer and have personal experience at this. When the steam hits the piston, it's all or nothing... from the pilots seat, it feels list 0-40 is instantaneous, and the 40-140 takes another 2-3 seconds. I'm not kidding... by the seat-of-the-pants, it feels like the plane slams you in the back at 50mph and THEN accelerates to launch speed.
I'm sure that the new electric catapults will feel less dramatic to the pilot, which is kind of the whole point. From an engineering perspective, decreasing peak impulse and providing a closed-loop, linear acceleration curve is all benefit and zero drawback. Greater efficiency, and less stress on both airframe components and the launcher itself. The next generation of carrier-qualified fighters will be able to use the same 1.6 diffs as their AF cousins, rather than needing to be upgraded to the heavier 1.8 units.*

* = A joke, a joke... I know the Navy will keep specifying 1.8 diffs long after carrier warfare is a dim memory.





Originally Posted by TrickerZ
Turbo + alternator for a hybrid?
Within the constraints of calling a current-gen Formula 1 car a hybrid, yes.



The Honda 2015 F1 Power Unit explained - Car Engineer

The system uses two motor-generators; one on the turbo shaft (MGU-H), another coupled to the drivetrain (MGU-K).

During braking, the drivetrain motor puts electricity into a battery, and then on the transition from decel into accel, that electricity is fed into the turbo motor to spool it up immediately. At high-RPM WOT, useful energy can be extracted from the turbo shaft (above and beyond what's being used to power the compressor) and fed directly into the drivetrain motor to increase WHP, with any energy left in the battery being available to the drivetrain motor on a "push-for-boost" basis.
Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-im_p04.png  

Last edited by Joe Perez; Jul 12, 2015 at 11:17 AM.
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 08:27 AM
  #24937  
golftdibrad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 878
Total Cats: 79
From: Maryville TN
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez


I'm sure that the new electric catapults will feel less dramatic to the pilot, which is kind of the whole point. From an engineering perspective, decreasing peak impulse and providing a closed-loop, linear acceleration curve is all benefit and zero drawback. Greater efficiency, and less stress on both airframe components and the launcher itself. The next generation of carrier-qualified fighters will be able to use the same 1.6 diffs as their AF cousins, rather than needing to be upgraded to the heavier 1.8 units.*
not to mention they wont need to wait for steam to replenish before cycling the next aircraft. Usually not a problem, but a good problem to eliminate.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 09:12 AM
  #24938  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by hi_im_sean
This is incredible, how have we not known this?

That picture made my day.

Old Jul 14, 2015 | 10:45 AM
  #24939  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

they should install generators in the coolant pipes from the radiator, when the car overheats it can generate it's own electricity to power the fans.
Old Jul 14, 2015 | 12:33 PM
  #24940  
Monk's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,885
Total Cats: 617
From: Huntington, Indiana
Default

Here's that thing that was a planet once:

Attached Thumbnails The AI-generated cat pictures thread-80-046d1bb0_2a39_11e5_aca3_7f3c971afb6c_2015_07_14t141030z_1856203939_gf10000158948_38ff4b0cef54.jpg  



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 PM.