Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI

Old Aug 22, 2013 | 10:20 AM
  #821  
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,317
Total Cats: 99
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

First couple M/Ys almost always have some issues, especially on a brand new chassis, engine, car, etc. etc.

3rd or 4th model year is usually best...unless they do a big MMC and then there are all new issues the 1st year of the MMC...
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 10:59 AM
  #822  
NiklasFalk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,391
Total Cats: 63
From: Sweden
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
If this is true I am going to laugh at all of the early adopters who just got shafted. I would be even more tempted to pick one of these up though and boost it.

Scion FR-S to Get More Power From Larger Engine | AutoGuide.com News
I simplistically thought that this was going to happen at some time anyway. 2.5L boxers have been around the block and it will only need a little more cooling.

Why not a 4.0L boxer six instead? (a little more exotic than a LSx)
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #823  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
I simplistically thought that this was going to happen at some time anyway. 2.5L boxers have been around the block and it will only need a little more cooling.

Why not a 4.0L boxer six instead? (a little more exotic than a LSx)
I don't think it will be the EJ255 or 257 though.
I think it will be a punched out version of the current 2.0 with maybe some more fancy gizmos, JUST like they did from 05 to 06.
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #824  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by NiklasFalk
I simplistically thought that this was going to happen at some time anyway. 2.5L boxers have been around the block and it will only need a little more cooling.

Why not a 4.0L boxer six instead? (a little more exotic than a LSx)
You can supposedly cram one of them into the impreza engine bay, but I doubt you could fit one in the toyobaru.
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #825  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

All early adopters get shafted in some way. It's the trade off for the year+ of utility they've enjoyed vs the sideline sitters. While a boost would be nice, many are probably perfectly content with the existing power.

That said, if it got a 2.5L making ~250 BHP with a curve that didn't suck, that would be a lot more attractive to me and I would almost definitely end up buying one.
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 11:48 AM
  #826  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I understand that there are always problems with early models and certain improvements are made but 25% more displacement and horsepower for a mid-cycle refresh is a drastic improvement that would leave me pretty sour if I had a 2.0 liter.

I imagine that they will fix most of these reliability problems too. This will be one hell of a car if this all plays out correctly. It will definitely be moved up a base class by the racing bodies though.
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 07:15 PM
  #827  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by falcon
The low center of gravity thing is in the press release from Toyota. And they are the same chassis so I'd assume it's the same in the BRZ. My mistake on the motor compression. Sounds like it's a good candidate for a low boost Rotrex set up. Oscar should get on board with Cobb and build a bolt on kit with a Cobb acessport map. That would be the ****. And design it in a way that it can be removed without too much hassle for warranty and maintenance related work. I'd say 250whp and 200wtq would make a pretty damn fun daily driver :P...
And now you can. C30-94 kit ships tomorrow, with a CARB EO no less FR-S/BRZ Supercharger System | Jackson Racing

Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-86_bay_web-600x480.jpg  
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 07:36 PM
  #828  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Wow, that looks pretty sick. Having driven a BRZ, that would probably make it about perfect.

Interesting....
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 07:53 PM
  #829  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

I really think Kraftwerks was the worst thing to happen to Jackson Racing. Jackson has 3 Rotrex products on the market with CARB EO#s while Skunk2/KW is playing grabass in the shower with "Project G" on CR.net

/rant

There is a reason I haven't driven a BRZ/FRS. I'm happy not knowing what I'm missing
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 08:45 PM
  #830  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by EO2K
I really think Kraftwerks was the worst thing to happen to Jackson Racing. Jackson has 3 Rotrex products on the market with CARB EO#s while Skunk2/KW is playing grabass in the shower with "Project G" on CR.net

/rant
Pretty much covers it.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 08:48 PM
  #831  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

I don't get it.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 09:13 PM
  #832  
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,317
Total Cats: 99
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
I don't get it.
You don't get why EO2K doesn't want to drive a FR-S, or you don't get why KraftWerks was the worst thing to happen to Jackson Racing?
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 11:26 PM
  #833  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

I don't get why Kraftwerks was the worst thing to happen to Jackson Racing. Seems to me like CARB EO#s are a good thing, are they not?
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 01:31 AM
  #834  
EO2K's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,477
Total Cats: 1,924
From: Very NorCal
Default

Kraftwerks != Jackson Racing. They are NOW 2 completely separate entities.

CARB EO is not a blanket item, it covers specific components in specific configurations on specific cars of specific years. Example: an Executive Order Number for a BRZ don't mean dick for a Miata.

The Jacksons were working with KW to bring rotrex kits to market for the Miata and S2k. They did so and promised a lot, (including a CARB EO# and this is literally why I own a rotrex) but due to some internal uproar I'm not privy to, the Jacksons split from KW. In doing so JR left the Miata and S2k rotrex market for KW to figure out and have moved on to bigger and better things. KW shuffled their feet for well over a year and left a lot of people out in the cold, me included. All my dealings with Oscar Sr & Jr were always positive, if not productive. I've literally spent hours on hold waiting for Kraftwerks to pick up the phone or return my calls. GroupA/Skunk2/Kraftwerks has also made no effort to "make it right" with any of their previous customers. Go see my buildfail thread for an example of how they "fixed" my rotrex mounting plate. Dropping support on a product and screwing your existing customers is not how you build positive relationships in the market.

Jackson Racing has 3 fully developed rotrex products on the market right now with CARB EO# (R18 Civic, CR-Z, FR-S/BRZ) and from what I understand, more to come. CARB means nothing unless you live in CA and I understand that, but it means everything to those of us who choose to live on the left coast. Go read up on what happens to people who get busted for CARB violations. I'll give you a hit: its not just failing a smog check.

Kraftwerks is... not really developing anything as far as I can tell. "Project G" seems to be a "partnered" with them selling kits, but the G boys seem to be a bunch of 20 something stancebro CR.net toolbags from SoCal or the Bay Area. I've not been impressed with anything they have posted anywhere. I've mentally put them in the same category as the bros from Tuning Done Rong, if that makes any sense.

So yeah, sorry if I'm a little touchy about this.

Back on topic... thread needs more pr0n










I'd rock it in green
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-chargespeed-toyota-86-subaru-brz-bodykit-01.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-subaru-brz-super-gt-104-626x382.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-2012_subaru_brz_overseas_10-1207.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-2013-subaru-brz-interior.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-subaru-brz-getting-230-hp-without-turbocharging-52196-7.jpg  

Old Nov 20, 2013 | 08:56 AM
  #835  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

I have not followed the KraftWerks issues with Project-G, but in their [edit: Project-G's] defense, they've always seemed pretty professional and their products have always seemed of high quality. Granted, they are high quality aesthetic-oriented products and are definitely a better fit for CR.net than Trubo.net, but I am not sure it's fair to lump them in with the TDW(rong) guy.

If nothing else, Project-G's reps post legibly.


On-topic: What's the advantage of the JR/Rotrex kit vs the Innovate/Sprintex kit?

Last edited by Scrappy Jack; Nov 20, 2013 at 03:44 PM.
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 09:39 AM
  #836  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
I have not followed the KraftWerks ... they've always seemed pretty professional and their products have always seemed of high quality.

really?
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 09:41 AM
  #837  
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,317
Total Cats: 99
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Kraftwerks = junk (now that Jackson Racing has removed themselves from the situation)

Jackson Racing = super nice, high quality stuff with excellent company support, etc. etc.

My understanding is the Jackson's had to deal with a whole bunch of BS trying to get themselves out of a bad situation (Kraftwerks/Skunk2 disaster fest) and unfortunately they had to give up the rights to the Miata and S2000 kits.

Which means there will never be a decent Rotrex supercharger kit for the miata or s2000 from Jackson Racing. KW/Skunk2 might get there act together and make the kits decent, but I highly doubt it.

That, and the Jackson's basically wasted years of their lives and who knows how much money in R&D, etc., because of the Skunk2 arsehats.
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 09:47 AM
  #838  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
Kraftwerks = junk (now that Jackson Racing has removed themselves from the situation)

Jackson Racing = super nice, high quality stuff with excellent company support, etc. etc.

My understanding is the Jackson's had to deal with a whole bunch of BS trying to get themselves out of a bad situation (Kraftwerks/Skunk2 disaster fest) and unfortunately they had to give up the rights to the Miata and S2000 kits.

Which means there will never be a decent Rotrex supercharger kit for the miata or s2000 from Jackson Racing. KW/Skunk2 might get there act together and make the kits decent, but I highly doubt it.

That, and the Jackson's basically wasted years of their lives and who knows how much money in R&D, etc., because of the Skunk2 arsehats.
I'm sure junk2 will come out with the kit at some point, and I'm sure that it'll be 95% perfect with just a tiny bunch of annoying problems, like bolts that are a tad too short, or packaging the NA kit of parts in an NB box.
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 12:13 PM
  #839  
turbofan's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,146
Total Cats: 1,087
From: Lake Forest, CA
Default

Ah. Now I understand. Thanks for the explanation I had never followed it at all, because stupidcharger.

I get the CARB thing though, and the appeal that a CARB legal kit has. I remember reading some stuff in your thread EO2K, I'll have to review it because it seems like it was a LONG time ago. Didn't that happen like... 2 years ago?
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 12:35 PM
  #840  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Subaru Cross Sport Concept BRZ Wagon - 2013 Tokyo Auto Show - Road & Track

Yeah, I'd buy this.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.