Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2013 | 10:31 AM
  #641  
Vashthestampede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,564
Total Cats: 58
From: Danbury, CT
Default

Edmunds road test blog on the BRZ.

2013 Subaru BRZ Long Term Road Test - New Updates
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 12:04 PM
  #642  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Toyota GT 86 chief confirms supercharged & turbocharged variants under consideration - report
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 02:27 PM
  #643  
Stein's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,729
Total Cats: 166
From: Nebraska
Default



Name:  6forty_zps4cbe6182.jpg
Views: 122
Size:  212.8 KB
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-6forty_zps4cbe6182.jpg  
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 02:30 PM
  #644  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

might as well install a rotrex.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 02:36 PM
  #645  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

The giant peak power plots are cool and all, but I wish more companies would focus on making more torque under curve with these things. I've only seen one plot so far with a good amount of torque under curve. IT was on a fully built shop car.

*edit: I also want to see the plot to the roots type sc that Innovate was coming out with
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 02:59 PM
  #646  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Roots supercharger?

gross...
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 03:04 PM
  #647  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Dyno queens gonna dyno queen.


I want to see one with an EFR6258. 300ft-lbs@3500rpm and 400whp@7000rpm sounds like fun.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 03:18 PM
  #648  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
The giant peak power plots are cool and all, but I wish more companies would focus on making more torque under curve with these things. I've only seen one plot so far with a good amount of torque under curve. IT was on a fully built shop car.

*edit: I also want to see the plot to the roots type sc that Innovate was coming out with
You'll see one soon. The youngest son of the Tuner Tools family is going to be getting on in his FRS. He's a current WPI student. And owns a 1.6 miata too.

And on the power curve, he's making more torque than the stock peak before 3500 rpm.

Last edited by Leafy; Mar 11, 2013 at 03:37 PM.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 03:34 PM
  #649  
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 409
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Calling that a dyno queen is a bit of an exaggeration. That has a plenty big power band for a drag/street car, and would probably do pretty well on the track too, assuming it wouldnt blow up or overheat.

There are 600 hp time attack WRXs and Evos out there ripping it up. Im sure theyre tricky to drive, but that doesnt mean theyre not fast.
Like usual, you guys are way too fixated on having useless torque at 3k rpm.


700 hp from a 2.0L engine, probably a bit peaky... still really ******* fast:

Old Mar 11, 2013 | 03:37 PM
  #650  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Looks pretty good to me. Just because torque isn't flat doesn't mean it's not making a lot under the curve.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:09 PM
  #651  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Yep. At no point does it ever make less than stock, and they started the pull kinda late, in my opinion. I bet that thing ******* RIPS from pretty much any RPM you'd care about.

Unless you're all like "Hang on bro, let's race, but let's shift at 2000rpms."
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:10 PM
  #652  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
Unless you're all like "Hang on bro, let's race, but let's shift at 2000rpms."
Ok techsalvager.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:17 PM
  #653  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Ok techsalvager.

I laffed.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:18 PM
  #654  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

I saw that car today on Reddit. I'd agree that for a strictly street car more torque would be nice, but you cannot deny that on a track that is a great power curve.

How well that motor would hold together on any kind of track is a whole 'nother issue though. Stock block iirc, seems like it would explode pretty quickly on a road course.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:22 PM
  #655  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Well it takes ~2000rpm to get from 200ft-lbs to peak, so I'm sure it's nice smooth delivery.

But it only holds it for ~1000rpm. That isn't exactly what I would call a wide powerband.

But more importantly, I don't want 600 ******* horsepower!
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:27 PM
  #656  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Well it takes ~2000rpm to get from 200ft-lbs to peak, so I'm sure it's nice smooth delivery.

But it only holds it for ~1000rpm. That isn't exactly what I would call a wide powerband.

But more importantly, I don't want 600 ******* horsepower!
When you're talking small displacement motors like that, though... you don't see cars making that kind of power with 4000rpm torque "plateaus." Miatas included.

I'm with ya, though... for my purposes, i'd rather see 350whp with crazy response and ginormous flat "curves."

I just find this completely insane and awesome. I REALLY want to see a pull from 2000 or 2500rpms, though.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 04:29 PM
  #657  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

No reason why you shouldn't be able to tune the boost control to keep the torque peak at say double factory, 225ft-lbs from 4200+, and then you'd love it like woah.

But if you were going to go for that target, then yeah, smaller turbo (or EFR?) would be smarter. I admit.
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #658  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
..
Like usual, you guys are way too fixated on having useless torque at 3k rpm.
+1

I gotta laugh at all the guys whining their lightweight sports car doesn't have enough torque below 3500rpm. Sure, short shifting at part throttle is nice around town but even in my C6Z when it's go time, I drop down two or three gears. Our 95R shop car has I/H/E and ECU on a stock JDM NB2 long block. It's perfectly happy scooting around town, short shifting with sharp throttle response and still easily zipping past normal traffic. The stock FR-S I drove on track had perfectly spacd gearing for the available power and was just fine. In town it pulled smoothly enough but needed a downshift or two if you were in a hurry. Big deal.

Too many members here seem to be almost offended if it doesn't have 300lbs ft at 3000rpm I think it's an ex-street/drag racer or hot rodder mentality. Unless it boasts crazy torque down low it's not a real engine, insufficient or something. I don't get it.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 05:40 PM
  #659  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I didn't say any of that.

I mentioned more torque under curve because it feels fantastic on the street. Part throttling at 2500 and having the car scoot up to speed effortlessly is super awesome. Just personal preference.

This isn't the race section. There is no "wrong answer" its all personal preference.

I had a 3076 on a street car, don't lump me in with the likes of Techsalvager
Old Mar 11, 2013 | 05:44 PM
  #660  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I didn't say any of that.

I mentioned more torque under curve because it feels fantastic on the street. Part throttling at 2500 and having the car scoot up to speed effortlessly is super awesome. Just personal preference.

This isn't the race section. There is no "wrong answer" its all personal preference.

I had a 3076 on a street car, don't lump me in with the likes of Techsalvager
It's still gonna have that, though...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.