Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

H3AVY to H3AVYER to...H3AV1EST P1G

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:19 PM
  #561  
Pen2_the_penguin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,699
Total Cats: 95
From: Reno, NV
Default

Twin charge or ban.


Srsly, I bet someone here has extra IC piping to donate meow!

How about in the name of MURICA!



5Kzu3.jpg&size=400x1000
Attached Thumbnails H3AVY to H3AVYER to...H3AV1EST P1G-meanwhile-murica-_062f93860376eea9654d7c1a8db8eb13.jpg  
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:21 PM
  #562  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Yep. I just think it would be interesting to have a very clear datapoint for the 'a SC car will be faster than the equivalent turbo car because throttle response' people (not that they will let facts get in their way anyway).
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:24 PM
  #563  
18psi's Avatar
Thread Starter
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

lol honestly I think that argument might have some merit simply because the n00bs arguing it don't have enough experience to handle a turbo setup on track and spin out or crash or something.

But yeah I intend to datalog all this mumbo jumbo and post it up
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:24 PM
  #564  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

I'm pretty sure it's more complicated than you guys are making out. You need some way of bypassing the charger at higher rpms' i.e. past peak torque, or t just becomes an epic restriction.

It's not as simple as plumbing the turbo into the charger.
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:27 PM
  #565  
Pen2_the_penguin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,699
Total Cats: 95
From: Reno, NV
Default

Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
I'm pretty sure it's more complicated than you guys are making out. You need some way of bypassing the charger at higher rpms' i.e. past peak torque, or t just becomes an epic restriction.

It's not as simple as plumbing the turbo into the charger.
actually, its as simple as getting an external wastegate to work as a boost controlled valve

Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:31 PM
  #566  
18psi's Avatar
Thread Starter
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Bunch of geniuses in here

YO DAWG, ALL YOU GOTTA DO IS:

..
..
..
..
..
100001
..
..
..
..
PROFIT

Easy Peazy
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #567  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by richyvrlimited
I'm pretty sure it's more complicated than you guys are making out. You need some way of bypassing the charger at higher rpms' i.e. past peak torque, or t just becomes an epic restriction.

It's not as simple as plumbing the turbo into the charger.
A twin screw super charger takes a fixed volume and gulps it into the engine. When the turbo pressurizes the air that air becomes more dense.. so now the SC takes a volume of pressurized air and gulps it into the engine.
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #568  
Pen2_the_penguin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,699
Total Cats: 95
From: Reno, NV
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
A twin screw super charger takes a fixed volume and gulps it into the engine. When the turbo pressurizes the air that air becomes more dense.. so now the SC takes a volume of pressurized air and gulps it into the engine.
This would be an epic build, not going to lie. I'd attempt it myself if I had a twin screw just lying around. Ever since I saw that video of the Lotus Exige that was twin charged
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:03 PM
  #569  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Two things I found on google when searching for "twincharged miata"


Attached Thumbnails H3AVY to H3AVYER to...H3AV1EST P1G-3291570018_large.jpg   H3AVY to H3AVYER to...H3AV1EST P1G-34750556.jpg  
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:13 PM
  #570  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Bunch of geniuses in here

YO DAWG, ALL YOU GOTTA DO IS:

..
..
..
..
..
100001
..
..
..
..
PROFIT

Easy Peazy
Exactly!

Stop whining and do it. I am not asking you to fully optimize the system.
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 04:10 AM
  #571  
richyvrlimited's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,642
Total Cats: 42
From: Warrington/Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Pen2_the_penguin
actually, its as simple as getting an external wastegate to work as a boost controlled valve

Happy to be corrected, Done a bit of reading and it seems you can do either, with or without a bypass. Mind you look at the 2nd pic, look at the layout, TC>SC>IC

That'll be great fun to route. Read impossible with a FFS supercharger setup.

I've considered the setup myself seeing as I have a coldside supercharger, but I doubt I could afford the cost of a built engine.

Other series configurations exist where no bypass system is employed and both compressors are in continuous duty. As a result, compounded boost is always produced as the pressure ratios of the two compressors are multiplied, not added. In other words, if a supercharger which produced 10 psi (0.7 bar) (pressure ratio = 1.7) alone blew into a turbocharger which also produced 10psi alone, the resultant manifold pressure would be 27 psi (1.9 bar) (PR=2.8) rather than 20 psi (1.4 bar) (PR=2.3). This form of series twincharging allows for the production of boost pressures that would otherwise be unachievable with other compressor arrangements and would be inefficient.
Heh, in for 40psi Vlad?
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 05:05 AM
  #572  
Pen2_the_penguin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,699
Total Cats: 95
From: Reno, NV
Default

if we all twin charge what will this site be named?
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #573  
muoto's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 414
Total Cats: 69
From: Finland
Default

When I had my FFS I wondered a long time doing twincharger setup. Piping is hardest part and it’s not even that hard. Just one 180 turn before throttle body and then long pipe under the FFS intake. That’s all, rest is normal turbo IC routing. I found out that there’s no harm feeding positive pressure to the SC and you can always modify wastegate actuator to the MP62 bypass lever so that when turbo starts feeding, large part of the air bypass the SC rotors.

So do it !
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 10:08 AM
  #574  
Fireindc's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,705
Total Cats: 904
From: Taos, New mexico
Default

Originally Posted by Pen2_the_penguin
if we all twin charge what will this site be named?
hermaphroditemiata.net
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 01:47 PM
  #575  
Pen2_the_penguin's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,699
Total Cats: 95
From: Reno, NV
Default

lol
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 02:38 PM
  #576  
Chiburbian's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,331
Total Cats: 204
From: Loganville, GA
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I don't guinea pig for overcomplicated retardation in the name of "science" lol.
Well, I don't know if I would be willing to be a "guinea pig" either for such a project, but I disagree about it being overcomplicated retardation. Given that you already have (or will have shortly) all the parts I have to say I wish you would reconsider. I mean, You have the parts, you have the knowledge, and damnit, people like you.

I'll still respect you if you stick to your guns, but I will be disappointed not to see that epic build thread.
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 02:40 PM
  #577  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I sure with the 30 or so turbo kits he has at his disposal, he could cobble together something...
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #578  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I wonder if you can beat Faes 350hp dyno at 35 psi
Old Jul 11, 2013 | 03:45 PM
  #579  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

It's definitely overcomplicated retardation. The turbo he eventually wants will make MORE LOWEND TORQUE than a roots blower.
Old Jul 12, 2013 | 10:11 AM
  #580  
18psi's Avatar
Thread Starter
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

LOL I'm sticking to my guns, gayz.

I'll be done with the thupercharger by December and be installing the turbo goodies, so you are all more than welcome to buy it and run 100psi of compounded boost glory, faefae style

Anyways, some minor updates:

Scott contacted the developer(s) of MS and was informed that nitrous IN can't be used as an input for AC like he thought. or something to that effect. So it was set up wrong. So yesterday my friend came over and re-soldered a few pins on the DB37 like a boss and I sent my most current msq to Scott to re-do the software portion of it.

I am REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY hoping that fixes the last of my issues and I can finally finish tuning this bad boy.

So far it feels just like stock, but with about 40 or so (butty dyno estimate) bump everywhere.

I fabricated a 3" midpipe and bolted it to the car. I think its overwhelming the stock muffler though cause from about 2k-3k it rattles like crazy. Pisses me off and sounds like some old ratty honda civic or something. Will have to figure out what I'm gonna do about that. Don't wanna go full exhaust yet because I want to keep it quiet. I dunno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.