Trayvon Martin: What say y'all? - Page 23 - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

Trayvon Martin: What say y'all?

Old 07-10-2013, 11:10 AM
  #441  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

but if they do that, then they open up the jury to the idea of a different/multiple scenario, which in itself is reasonable doubt.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-10-2013, 12:37 PM
  #442  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

the defense should not have called the current witness. it's adding nothing and the state is running with him.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 10:46 AM
  #444  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 107
Default

Judge considers lesser charges in Zimmerman case

I didn't even realize it was possible?
z31maniac is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 10:49 AM
  #445  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

in FL everything is possible.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 10:54 AM
  #446  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,676
Total Cats: 186
Default

Is it really legal to change the charges after the trial is already this far in without a plea? That seems like shady ****. What is to stop the DA from just hitting you with the highest charge he can and then just lowering the standard when he can't prove his case. That just sounds ridiculous.

EDIT: I just looked it up and in most courts it is perfectly legal for you to be tried for one charge and be convicted of a lessor charge if evidence for the original charge is insufficient.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:12 AM
  #447  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

yeah it seems kinda weak, so they just shoot for the stars and just grab whatever they can on the way down. I feel like if you're being tried for a certain crime, that's all you should be subjected to. Although I guess any lesser charges also being considered prevents double jeopardy, where they just charge him for manslaughter after a failed 2nd degree trial or something.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:17 AM
  #448  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

The judge is allowing the court to consider manslaughter. now they are arguing to allow child abuse charges.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:18 AM
  #449  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,676
Total Cats: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack View Post
Although I guess any lesser charges also being considered prevents double jeopardy, where they just charge him for manslaughter after a failed 2nd degree trial or something.
This is actually a way to skirt double jeopardy. The bolded section is specifically prohibited by double jeopardy. You can only be tried for any given crime (read as "event") once. The charge doesn't matter. This sounds like a rule put in place to seek "justice" when the DA gets overzealous in what he thinks he can prove. Sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me. The DA needs to know what he can prove and what he can't and make a decision based on the facts. If he overshoots he should not have this kind of bullshit to fall back on. This just breeds mediocrity.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:22 AM
  #450  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,676
Total Cats: 186
Default

I can definitely see a manslaughter charge sticking. Way to ******* back pedal DA.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:36 AM
  #451  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,528
Total Cats: 106
Default

And now they want 3rd degree murder based on "child abuse"

Talk about a political lynching!
olderguy is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 11:37 AM
  #452  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

West to Judge Nelson:

"Just when I thought this case couldn't get anymore bizarre...child abuse?

...

This was a trick this is a trick by the state!"
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 12:09 PM
  #453  
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (18)
 
olderguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,528
Total Cats: 106
Default

Judge: "Show me in law where it states that following someone is not illegal"

Go ahead, prove the negative.
olderguy is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 12:19 PM
  #454  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

That is in regards to allowing it in the jury instructions; I agree with the judge in this case.

Unless there's a law that says it's specifically legal, they can't be instructed on it. All the defense has to do is make sure the jury understands that following someone is not illegal during closing statements.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 12:53 PM
  #455  
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,455
Total Cats: 81
Default

The race thing is part of THE NARRATIVE of the mass media:

(Practice spotting the media's LIES BY OMISSION in the snippets below):

JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 02:04 PM
  #456  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

judge threw out the 3rd degree felony murder for child abuse charge.


so lesser is just: manslaughter.



EDIT: oh looks like Angela Corey finally showed up to her show trial.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 03:14 PM
  #457  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

I cant decide if this was her attempt to create or prevent a mistrial:

Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 03:43 PM
  #458  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

In opening statements, the prosecution claimed GZ walked up to TM and shot him point blank in the chest. Yet to mention that about 2 hours into closing statements, just a lot a talk about a struggle before getting shot; weird. It's almost like they had to change their entire case mid-trial because their witnesses didn't match the story the Major, DOJ, and/or President of United States told them happened.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 03:45 PM
  #459  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

ROFL, he just suggested that the small button/pin on TM's hoodie is why it was about 4-5" away from his body when shot.
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-11-2013, 04:33 PM
  #460  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 75,274
Total Cats: 2,152
Default

HE has still yet to provide any proof to the jury why GZ committed 2nd° murder...just a bunch of "how comes" and "what ifs" about GZ's story.
Braineack is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Trayvon Martin: What say y'all?


Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.