Hustler's build thread 2.0, the natural aspiration connection - Page 15 - Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Welcome to Miataturbo.net   Members
 


Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2012, 12:50 AM   #281
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,131
Total Cats: 598
Default

Any plans to run E85? Dont know if you're trying to get every single pony you can but it should help with knock.
triple88a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 02:16 AM   #282
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,114
Total Cats: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RussellT94 View Post
What exhaust was on the car when dynoed? I assume you didn't get the RS yet if it was ordered yesterday.
Leaky something or other that I borrowed. Very leaky.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 02:16 AM   #283
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,114
Total Cats: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by triple88a View Post
Any plans to run E85? Dont know if you're trying to get every single pony you can but it should help with knock.
I'm considering it heavily for next year.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 03:42 AM   #284
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Plano,TX
Posts: 674
Total Cats: 3
Default

I can't wait until this car has 21st century electronics on it. It's starting to show the potential of which I imagined. This car won't run 1:27's at Hallett, but I think 1:28's will be attainable...even if it's a 1:28.9.
johnwag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 04:42 AM   #285
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Reverant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,441
Total Cats: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafy View Post
You're getting knock on tip in? MS doesnt have transient in knock retard like any halfway decent OEM ecu made this century?
Is this Techsalvager?

I've never, EVER gotten tip-in knock on ANY of the cars I've tuned.
Reverant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 05:43 AM   #286
Murderator
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 36,196
Total Cats: 2,583
Default

Just ignore him. 50% of his post content is completely and utterly BS. internet knowledge ftl
18psi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 11:46 AM   #287
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,131
Total Cats: 598
Default

Gotta love when the new girlfriends son of the long lost brother of my friends mother says this sucks so now i spread stuff that it sucks.
triple88a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 01:14 PM   #288
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,093
Total Cats: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverant View Post
Is this Techsalvager?

I've never, EVER gotten tip-in knock on ANY of the cars I've tuned.
I have, its from pushing the timing to the limit. You need it on map cars for the same reason you need transient throttle enrichment. The real air load has increased before the measured air load has. And running the tune at the limit you will get it. Or if you're just an OEM who has the car tuned for gas mileage. Often you pass through the gas mileage cells at this time where you're running crap loads of timing. But I'll normally give up some power and fuel economy if the ecu doesnt have tip in knock retard.

Last edited by Leafy; 09-09-2012 at 01:37 PM.
Leafy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 02:04 PM   #289
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,685
Total Cats: 216
Default

So wait, MS doesnt have tip-in retard?
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 02:57 AM   #290
Tour de Franzia
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,114
Total Cats: 351
Default

Bros, my exhaust doesn't fit. Bauce.
hustler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 03:01 AM   #291
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 4,685
Total Cats: 216
Default

Open header. Post vidz.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 09:25 AM   #292
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,892
Total Cats: 1,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie View Post
So wait, MS doesnt have tip-in retard?
No, I heard MS DOESN'T have tip-in retard.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 09:34 AM   #293
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,485
Total Cats: 248
Default

Why tip-in retard timing when you should tip-in enrich fuel to maintain AFR instead?
TurboTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 09:35 AM   #294
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,892
Total Cats: 1,792
Default

Don't you want a setup like techsalvager? he does everything right.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 10:36 AM   #295
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,093
Total Cats: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTim View Post
Why tip-in retard timing when you should tip-in enrich fuel to maintain AFR instead?
Even with proper afr from transient fueling you can still get knock either from the map sensor not reading the actual load (same reason you need transient fueling) and passing through cells with way too much advance. Or even just from the nature of whats happening during those transient throttle events. If the OEM's do it and you hit this preventative knock retard on a stock car with a stock tune, don't you think it would be a nice thing to have?
Leafy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 10:39 AM   #296
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,892
Total Cats: 1,792
Default

no.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 11:00 AM   #297
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,485
Total Cats: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafy View Post
Even with proper afr from transient fueling you can still get knock either from the map sensor not reading the actual load (same reason you need transient fueling)
You need transient fueling trims due to physics and thermodynamics. I imagine having lag in the MAP sensor signal would add to the issue. Acceleration enrichment based of TPS rate of change is, in my lowly opinion, the right way to do it.

Quote:
If the OEM's do it and you hit this preventative knock retard on a stock car with a stock tune, don't you think it would be a nice thing to have?
Just because OEM do it does not make it right.
TurboTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 11:09 AM   #298
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,093
Total Cats: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTim View Post
You need transient fueling trims due to physics and thermodynamics. I imagine having lag in the MAP sensor signal would add to the issue. Acceleration enrichment based of TPS rate of change is, in my lowly opinion, the right way to do it. .
Why is spark immune from this effect if fuel isnt? Remember with all other variable held equal detonation resistance is proportional to air flow. If you're determining air flow through math based off of a map sensor and have already agreed that a map sensor doesn't give accurate results during transients then how to you expect to be using good data to determine your spark advance?

And yes acceleration enrichment based off of delta TPS is the right way to do any transient response tables because the tps reacts instantly to the drivers requested air flow.
Leafy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 11:32 AM   #299
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,485
Total Cats: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafy View Post
Why is spark immune from this effect if fuel isnt?
The majority of the issue with lean tip-in is due to the fact that a gaseous fuel/air mixture at xxx absolute pressure will separate into not a gaseous fuel/air mixture if that pressure changes rapidly and positively, the extent of which varies depending on a few variables. Going from a high vacuum to not so much vacuum in a relatively short time period causes some fuel to come out of suspension. Lean spike.

Same reason there is decel enrighment. Snap that throttle shut and the fuel puddled on various walls goes to vapor from the massive vacuum change. Rich spike.

Like we agree, TPS signal is a much more accurate signal, time wise, to tune a trim to account for this phenomenon.

Signal delay within MAP sensor based fuel/ignition maps surely would have an effect too, but not as great in my opinion.

Quote:
If you're determining air flow through math based off of a map sensor and have already agreed that a map sensor doesn't give accurate results during transients then how to you expect to be using good data to determine your spark advance?
I follow you. Valid point taken. I have not seen a deltaTPS/time ignition retard/advance feature in my limited experience with tuneable ECUs. I have also never looked at a megasquirt.

This makes me want to see how much more timing I am running at lots of vacuum compared to atmospheric pressure. I don't think there's much difference so this feature, if it did exist, might not matter much for my particular setup. And under boost, my MAP sensor signal responds quicker than the turbo.
TurboTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 12:11 PM   #300
Boost Czar
iTrader: (61)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 72,892
Total Cats: 1,792
Default

Instert Meme Here:

Runs MS since 2006.

Doesnt care about tip-in retardation.
Braineack is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project Gemini - Turbo Civic on the Cheap Full_Tilt_Boogie Build Threads 59 Yesterday 09:00 PM
OTS Bilstein to motorsports ASN conversion stoves Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain 5 04-21-2016 04:00 PM
WTB MP62 (Hotside) (NB2) Rick02R WTB 3 01-03-2016 08:18 PM
Leaky Wilwoods mx592 Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain 1 10-01-2015 01:45 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.