Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

COP Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #901  
Rafa's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
From: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by j_man
Yup, that what I meant by "in parallel" - those folks running wasted spark config have to wire the coils in pairs - one pair for 1 & 4 and one pair for 2 & 3.

Looks like some stock Miata ECUs have marginal ignition drivers, and each of those can't drive two Toyota coils in parallel. Also, the stock ECU is running different dwell times than what's recommended for the Toyota coils.

All that stuff (and that box they are talking about which most likely Jason C will be designing) is for people running stock ECUs and piggybacks (Xede, AEM F/IC, etc.)

For people running aftermarket standalone ECUs with strong drivers and adjustable dwell - all this doesn't matter.

Some concerns. I'm running mines exactly as Dan pictured them (except for the tach signal). Since I'm using my car's ecu and running the MS in parallel I'm worried about Jman's assertion that, quote:"the stock ECU is running different dwell times than what's recommended for Toyota coils".

My problem is that every now and then when I fire up the car I'll get some kind of noise resembling that of a backfire and a little bit of smoke. I checked once and saw some smoke coming from where the injectors are located so I assumed (yeah, I know about assuming :gay that it could be fuel left over. Now I worry about whether the different dwell times may be an issue. If so, should I change those settings?

Thanks,

Rafa
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:34 PM
  #902  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

yes you should have changed your dwell to 2.5ms in MS.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #903  
cjernigan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

It's not dwell times causing that pop at start up Rafa. It's a rich idle from when you shut the car off or your car is setup to prime when you turn the key on. For some reason MS discharges the coils when you turn the key on, so if fuel is left in the cylinders then it will pop.
You said you saw smoke from the injector area, that could mean you have a leak there. One of those pops could have blown off a vacuum line, that could cause a bad idle. If you have a vac leak your idle will surge or hunt around instead of being stable.
Your MS is running the correct dwell times for your COPs Rafa. That's not something you need to worry about.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #904  
Rafa's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
From: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by cjernigan
It's not dwell times causing that pop at start up Rafa. It's a rich idle from when you shut the car off or your car is setup to prime when you turn the key on. For some reason MS discharges the coils when you turn the key on, so if fuel is left in the cylinders then it will pop.
You said you saw smoke from the injector area, that could mean you have a leak there. One of those pops could have blown off a vacuum line, that could cause a bad idle. If you have a vac leak your idle will surge or hunt around instead of being stable.
Your MS is running the correct dwell times for your COPs Rafa. That's not something you need to worry about.
Ok, thanks to both.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #905  
Rafa's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
From: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
yes you should have changed your dwell to 2.5ms in MS.

They're both set to 2.5ms so I'm ok there.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 03:35 AM
  #906  
RacingGreen's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 67
Total Cats: 0
From: Germany
Default

Maybe one silly question:

how much do four of the Toyota coils weight together?

I'm about to order some, but it seems the seller wants to rip me off with shipping costs...

Thanx

Bjoern
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #907  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

maybe 2lbs.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #908  
jasonrobo02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 606
Total Cats: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by RacingGreen
Maybe one silly question:

how much do four of the Toyota coils weight together?

I'm about to order some, but it seems the seller wants to rip me off with shipping costs...

Thanx

Bjoern
If this is/was an ebay transaction, then high shipping costs are the norm. Many sellers make a few extra bucks by charging a high shipping cost and hoping that people won't notice and effectively overbid for an item once shipping costs are included with the winning auction price. Good luck.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #909  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

I read the last 10 pages and I am a bit confused. From what I understand 96/97 cars dont need a separate tach input run from the COP's because the ECU gets its reading from the CAS?

The second thing im confused about is the location of the coil plug harness under the hood. Is it the big plug above the fuel injectors or the smaller 4 plug one in the back near the coil?
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #910  
Braineack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

its the plug that attaches to your coilpack!

this has been discussed. use the diagram in the archives. I pulled out all the crap out.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #911  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
its the plug that attaches to your coilpack!

this has been discussed. use the diagram in the archives. I pulled out all the crap out.
Thought so, then its the plug in the back. i have been scared to flash my ecu using the car for power because I wasnt sure. Just kept using my stim.

Saw the archive, wasnt sure. Now im sure, I saw the "edited" date.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #912  
Rafa's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
From: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
Thought so, then its the plug in the back. i have been scared to flash my ecu using the car for power because I wasnt sure. Just kept using my stim.

Saw the archive, wasnt sure. Now im sure, I saw the "edited" date.
There are 2 grey plugs to the coils on the 96/97. Those only have 3 connectors because the tach isn't connected there.

Last edited by Rafa; Jan 17, 2008 at 01:32 PM.
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #913  
j_man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 741
Total Cats: 20
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
I read the last 10 pages and I am a bit confused. From what I understand 96/97 cars dont need a separate tach input run from the COP's because the ECU gets its reading from the CAS?
The CAS has nothing to do it. The ECU always gets its reading from the CAS.

In '90 .. '95 cars the coil packs generate the square wave (by grounding the wire to the tach, ECU just pulls up)

In '95-1/2 .. '05 cars, the ECU generates the square wave
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #914  
blownmiata91's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Total Cats: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Default

Hi guys. I will be using your info to install COPs. Has anyone any experience wiring for sequential firing with a Link ECU?
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #915  
orion4096's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 550
Total Cats: 19
From: bay area, ca
Default simple cop test

Is there a way to do a basic test on a toyota cop with just a multimeter? I've been searching around and apparently the primary and secondary coils should have a resistance between a certain range, but I'm not sure which leads I need to check or if this is even possible without powering them on and having a more elaborate setup.
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #916  
orion4096's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 550
Total Cats: 19
From: bay area, ca
Default

Originally Posted by orion4096
Is there a way to do a basic test on a toyota cop with just a multimeter? I've been searching around and apparently the primary and secondary coils should have a resistance between a certain range, but I'm not sure which leads I need to check or if this is even possible without powering them on and having a more elaborate setup.
Nevermind. I decided to just buy everything and try it out. Scored this for a pretty good price from someone who swapped engines on a Celica GT. Not sure what I'm going to do with the manual or the rest of the engine harness.

Old Feb 3, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #917  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by orion4096
Nevermind. I decided to just buy everything and try it out. Scored this for a pretty good price from someone who swapped engines on a Celica GT. Not sure what I'm going to do with the manual or the rest of the engine harness.

One word... Resell. I'm sure someone would be interested in a manual, and someone else might want a new harness cause theirs was damaged? Ebay it mang!! Good luck!

FWIW, I'm one of TWO miata owners who can't get COP to work.. I'm convinced that the ignitors in my coils are the malfunction.
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #918  
orion4096's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 550
Total Cats: 19
From: bay area, ca
Default

Is it ok to leave the tach input floating on the newer 1.8s? Maybe the cop has an internal weak pull down (up?) making this ok?
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 09:50 AM
  #919  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

elesjuan,

Is your car a 99/00? If so the 99/00 ECU cannot drive 2 COPs at the same time.

I am working on a circuit that will enable the 99/00 ECU to drive the COPs in pairs, and also reduce the dwell to what is required.
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #920  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

I wasn't finished with the above message, but I am sitting in front of a beach in the Carribean with my laptop, I leaned over to get a slice of pizza, and my belly pressed down on the touchpad!

The 99/00 dwell times are so long that it will make the COPs run very hot possibly overheating.

Anyway, I also have an idea for a circuit that will generate fully sequential signals for the COPs, derived from the 99/00 cam sensor signal. This will make the COPs run half as hot, good for high RPM operation.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.