Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 05:54 PM
  #561  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BogusSVO

Unless the intake engeneers for Edelbrock all these years have been wrong....
Short runner B18 Edelbrock manifold, for 7000-10000rpm:
Edelbrock Victor X Intake Manifolds - SummitRacing.com

Long runner B18 Edelbrock manifold, for 3000-7800rpm:
Edelbrock Performer X Intake Manifolds 4771 - SummitRacing.com
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 05:57 PM
  #562  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Hmm a design i'm thinking off is an extremely short runner that gets rid of the pulses completely, more so like a plenum bolted directly to the head? Something like this?

Attached Thumbnails Honda intake manifold-plenum-intake.gif  
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #563  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

I have never, EVER, seen any information showing long runners = top end power.
In fact, everything I have ever seen about intake manifolds, supports the short = topend, and long = lowend general rule of thumb we have here.

Sorry BogusSVO

Last edited by 18psi; Dec 20, 2012 at 06:58 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 06:56 PM
  #564  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Hmm a design i'm thinking off is an extremely short runner that gets rid of the pulses completely
You say this like the pulses are a bad thing...
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 06:57 PM
  #565  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

20K RPM motor IM build. I want to see this.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #566  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
You say this like the pulses are a bad thing...
Correct because they are pulses that go back into the air going towards the runners.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #567  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,106
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Correct because they are pulses that go back into the air going towards the runners.
I'll give you a hint: Pulses aren't a bad thing.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #568  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

lol he hates torque
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 09:08 PM
  #569  
Vilko's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 111
Total Cats: 8
Default

Correct me if Im wrong:
The pulses are reflections OFF THE INSIDE OF THE PLENUM, not the runners themselves. So you will have tiny little reflections, so you will get the benefit of those reflections no where in your rpm range. I dont know if pulses are a disadvantage at any point, I dont recall reading that anywhere.

Has anyone done any research into how the resonance frequencies of the intake manifold effect the flow? Its probably minor compared to things like volume, length, etc.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 09:15 PM
  #570  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

Lol the resonance frequencies is the most important part of designing a manifold. They greatly increase the amount of air entering the cylinders at the rpms where the high pressure wave is at the valve while the valve is open.
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 09:47 PM
  #571  
emilio700's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,626
Total Cats: 2,618
Default

Originally Posted by Vilko
Has anyone done any research into how the resonance frequencies of the intake manifold effect the flow? Its probably minor compared to things like volume, length, etc.
Things like volume, length, cross section dictate resonant frequencies.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.33 SNR
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 10:16 PM
  #572  
triple88a's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,522
Total Cats: 1,830
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Its been a while since we talked about this but whatever happened with begis manifolds? Werent they designing some stuff? I wanted to see how the top tb mount manifold will perform
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 11:16 AM
  #573  
Dot3's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 380
Total Cats: -14
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Sorry for resurrecting this thread but did anyone actually dyno this setup? After the 5th page I just started scrolling looking for results.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #574  
oreo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 332
Total Cats: 96
From: Toronto Area, Ontario
Default

see post 546
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 01:53 AM
  #575  
Vilko's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 111
Total Cats: 8
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Things like volume, length, cross section dictate resonant frequencies.
I mean resonance as in the note it would produce if you were to play it like a triangle. Not to be confused with the sound/pressure waves that reflect off the plenum and influence the power band.
All the things you listed would affect resonance frequency, but so would the material its made from and a whole lot of other factors. Its probably not a big enough influence on power to justify the effort.
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 08:12 PM
  #576  
Gotpsi?'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,260
Total Cats: 5
From: Central, TX / Bay area, CA
Default

I cant believe this thread is still going.
Old Jan 23, 2013 | 09:37 AM
  #577  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

Might as well just sticky the thread. Lots of good info in here.
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 05:02 PM
  #578  
Der_Idiot's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Total Cats: 29
From: Saint Paul, MN
Default

Does that set of dyno sheets reflect begi's NEW manifold that will probably never happen?

Last I heard that thing was supposed to be getting tested LAST SPRING. Nothing on there website even mentions it anymore. I'd love to get a manifold, especially one that is proven (see post 546). If I can find one I'll do a back to back stock 99 intake vs new and add more data.
Old Jan 28, 2013 | 02:50 PM
  #579  
doward's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,608
Total Cats: 817
From: Columbus, OH
Default

Just for data's sake..
This was the baseline before touching up the tune and revving higher. Sounds like most guys will stay at or near factory limit.
Refreshed N/A 94 block, stock 99 head. Solid line is 99 mani without vics wired, dotted is Blox skunk2 copy manifold.


Attached Thumbnails Honda intake manifold-hondaimdyno-1.jpg  
Old Jan 31, 2013 | 01:28 PM
  #580  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 269
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack


this compares pauls to a 97 block with 99 head and the same components.
I don't get this graph. Is one just tuned worse than the other? if they have the same components....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.