Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 02:05 PM
  #461  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

So, take Emilio's wheels, tires, brake pads and alignment and add this:



93 octane and ~8 PSI (stock injectors)
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #462  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

I'd like to see it with a smaller turboz and zero mods...just that way from the factory.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 08:21 PM
  #463  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I'd like to see it with a smaller turboz and zero mods...just that way from the factory.
But there is no space for a turbo duh...
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 02:43 PM
  #464  
gospeed81's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
From: Spring, TX
Default

First Turbocharged Subaru BRZ Boosted To 278 Horsepower

now we're talkin'...


That's a 73% increase in whp over stock for those of you that suck at simple maths.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #465  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

That is a beautiful torque curve. I think this platform will be absolutely insane as people really start to tinker with it. I am assuming that was all done on stock internals? I am impressed.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #466  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

needs more low end.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 04:45 PM
  #467  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,794
Total Cats: 1,342
From: Rochester, NY
Default

How is it that someone can go out and buy a brand new car and mod it before the thing is even broken in?
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 08:18 PM
  #468  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

answer: moar boost.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 09:41 PM
  #469  
Saml01's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I'd honestly consider one if i wanted three 2-dr cars.

but id also consider the other heavy, expensive, higher HP ones to
Your fingers keep saying no but you know you do.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 08:20 AM
  #470  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Saml01
Your fingers keep saying no but you know you do.
The G37x, CLK, C-Class coupe, 2-Dr Accord V6 are on my list, the BRZ/FRS...not.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #471  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,035
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by rleete
How is it that someone can go out and buy a brand new car and mod it before the thing is even broken in?
Ask yourself how many turbo kits and/or ecutek 'tunes' do they need to sell to recover the cost of the car and overhead? I am sure the car is written off as a shop expense once tax time comes too
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #472  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by rleete
How is it that someone can go out and buy a brand new car and mod it before the thing is even broken in?
it's not the broken in part i care about, it's the modding of a brand new car.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #473  
Opti's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 625
Total Cats: 22
From: DF-DUB
Default

Originally Posted by rleete
How is it that someone can go out and buy a brand new car and mod it before the thing is even broken in?
According to subaru the break in period is only 1k miles, keep it under 4K. I could put 4K on it in a week.

They did it because being the first to the market with an expensive turbo kit will help them sell more initially to the people who bought the car and have the money to mod it right away. In a few years when prices are being driven down by cheaper kits margins will shrink and it will be harder to recoupe the cost of the car.

Friend did it with the Scion tC, one of the first turbocharged tCs and the first automatic turbocharged tC, which ultimately lead to many problems haha.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 12:32 PM
  #474  
rleete's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,794
Total Cats: 1,342
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
it's not the broken in part i care about, it's the modding of a brand new car.
That's what I meant. Sorta in conjunction with your statement about "if im buying a brand new car, that ---- isn't getting touched."

I didn't realize it was a development place making kits/parts, I thought it was just someone with money to burn.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #475  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default



car has too much traction. lol, I hate what drifting has done to the world.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 01:47 PM
  #476  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
lol, I hate what drifting has done to the world.
Hater


Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-drift-crash.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-bigdriftaccident.jpg   Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-sstp_0912_12_o-formula_drift_washington-toyota_crash.jpg  
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #477  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

i mean, this dude is saying the FRS sucks because you cant get it sideways and it has too much traciton to be fast around a track.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:31 PM
  #478  
Sparetire's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
From: Colorado
Default

Pretty much every other reveiw I have read is talking about how easy it is to play at the limits of the car.

Maybe they have water-logged brake fluid and no talent.

Nice jacket though.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:39 PM
  #479  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
i mean, this dude is saying the FRS sucks because you cant get it sideways and it has too much traciton to be fast around a track.
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-my-brain-full-fuck.jpg  
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:59 PM
  #480  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Post

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
Quoted from another site, allegedly pulled From 949Racing's Facebook page (I say allegedly only because I have not verified it personally):
Some FR-S test results from Buttonwillow 13CW this weekend. In each case, I did maybe 1-2 hot laps then came in. I had a total of 8-10 full laps for the entire day, 1-2 laps at at time then in for changes. I had to adapt to whatever changes we made on the out lap, go for it then back in for more adjustments or switch drivers. The car's owner did the bulk of the driving. So most of my laps had little errors, or traffic. I'd say each lap time posted here left 1s on the table in the same conditions. All runs 100% as delivered from dealer unless otherwise mentioned.

1. 100% bone stock + Carbotech XP10/XP8 pads, 85° 2:12.1
2. 255/40/17 RS3 on 17x9, Subaru "crash" alignment bolts, 90° 2:07.1
3. Same as 2, + prototype AST 4150's, 93°, 2:03.75. This lap had three big mistakes.

Too hot and ran out of time to test much else. Lots left on the table. Sub 2:00 car on RS3's in cool weather with a few tweaks to the coilover setup. Wanted to test the Ventus TD C71's but didn't get them in time. That would have been high 1:58's I think. Yes, the FR-S is fast.

If I have my facts straight, the 2:03.75 is on par with Emilio's NB2-engined 95R SuperMiata street project car (2:03.16 on 2012-01-30) and a few hundredths slower than the old silver 1999 rental car's 2010 time of 2:03.39 (before it became Crusher).

Not too shabby for a wheel, tire, brake pad and coilover change in 93* heat and not much seat time in that vehicle.
Road & Track took a MazdaSpeed 3, WRX and FR-S to Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch. They ran them on stock tires, then swapped stock-sized Star Specs and then 18" Star Specs on 7.5" wide Advan RG-II wheels on to the FR-S.

* MS3: 1:27.6 (stock 225/40-18 Dunlop SP Sport 2050)
* WRX: 1:28.3 (stock 235/45-17 Dunlop SP Sport 01)
* FR-S: 1:29.3 (stock 215/45-17 Primacy HP)
* FR-S: 1:27.0 (215/45-17 Star Spec)
* FR-S: 1:27.6 (235/40-18 Star Spec)

Link to full article


For what it's worth, Tire Rack lists the MS3's SP Sport 2050 as an "Ultra High Performance Summer" tire and the Star Spec as an "Extreme Performance Summer" tire. The Primacy HP is a low rolling resistance (LRR) qualified Grand Touring Summer tire.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.