Notices
Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want

Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 09:46 AM
  #501  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Also, probably bs and wont get put into them, but:
Subaru developing engine for BRZ Turbo
Subaru debuts a turbo version of the FA20 engine | Kaizen Factor



If they did, I'd probably go buy one cash moneyz
Would seriously be my "perfect car"
Attached Thumbnails Want or do not want? Subaru BRZ STI-subaru-fa20-turbocharged-2.0-liter-boxer-four.jpg  
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:16 AM
  #502  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
Just because you can drive a slow car fast, does not make them fast. It means the driver was able to overcome the governing body that forces them to be slow turds using old methods of slowness.
I don't think I understand your point. We might be talking past each other (or you are trying to argue for the sake of arguing)?

This street car was quicker than a slow "race car" and not that far off of some very serious and/or very spendy hardware. As in, orders of magnitude more expensive.

Basically, this seems like a modern Miata coupe: it hits way above its weight class in near-stock trim and seems to have a load of potential with heavy mods.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #503  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

i just like to hate. my comments are to be ignored.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:31 AM
  #504  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Scrappy that car that went under the spec miata record was stock right? Not the 460hp turbo one others are talking about? I assume it was, as I doubt those turbo kits are ready for the track yet.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:38 AM
  #505  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

The turbo one only visited the drag strip so far.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #506  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Scrappy that car that went under the spec miata record was stock right? Not the 460hp turbo one others are talking about? I assume it was, as I doubt those turbo kits are ready for the track yet.
Correct; non-turbo.

My understanding - and consider all of this third party hearsay as I did not have a chance to interview the owner in depth - is that the car is stock or near stock in terms of power. I was told by a friend of the owner that it has an "E85 tune" but I'm not sure how much difference that makes on those cars.

I believe he has off-the-shelf BC coilovers, wheels, tires and the tune. This is the Arsenal Autosport car that also ran the time attack event at PBIR (Palm Beach Intl Raceway, formerly Moroso).
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #507  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Tune would yield about 20hp or so iirc
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:00 AM
  #508  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Cool. A stock car with wheels/tires beating the spec miata record on a short lap is pretty impressive, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a turbo car making close to 500hp before I start bragging about it to people who hate on the Toyoberu.

And yeah, if or when miatas become too rare to be this cheap (hopefully never) the FRS/BRZ would be my first choice for my new toy. Until or unless Mazda can't produce on a ~2200lbs ND.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:16 AM
  #509  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
Basically, this seems like a modern Miata coupe: it hits way above its weight class in near-stock trim and seems to have a load of potential with heavy mods.
Yet you'll never overcome the fact that it looks like complete and total dog **** and the roof doesn't come off....

Still, do not want.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #510  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

so you want a c70?
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #511  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

Welp they better step it up and deliver on their rumors of a sub 2500 di boosted ND or whatever because they will get muscled out by all these new cars. Hyundai has tonsa power but is a pig. Toyobaru isn't a pig but also doesn't have tonsa power. If the ND could have ok power (at least a bit over 200) AND be under 2600lbs I'd consider them "back in the game"
Originally Posted by elesjuan
Yet you'll never overcome the fact that it looks like complete and total dog **** and the roof doesn't come off....

Still, do not want.
Often times I think I'm the most negative, pessimistic ******* I know.

Then I look at you and suddenly I'm a "glass half full" person

Seriously man........Give other cars a chance.
lol
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #512  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Welp they better step it up and deliver on their rumors of a sub 2500 di boosted ND or whatever because they will get muscled out by all these new cars. If the ND could have ok power (at least a bit over 200) AND be under 2600lbs I'd consider them "back in the game"
With those stats they would be a class leader in performance, not just "back in the game".

Those stats are also highly unlikely because Mazda is not a huge automaker and does not have loads of cash or the ability to amortize their costs over ginormous production runs. Realistically I think they can pull off a sub 2300lb miata with roughly 170hp and maybe 180hp if they push it. Do not expect >200hp because that is just not going to happen as it would be cost prohibitive.

They will always sell the miata well because there just is no other 2 seat convertible roadster in that price range and it has already been stated that the BRZ/FR-S will not come to america in a convertible form because it would cost too much and no one would buy it, or so they say.

I just hope Mazda doesn't try to put a 1.3 turbo engine in the miata like some rumors state. I would rather them put in the 2.0l skyactive engine they already have developed and tune it a little more for performance and less for mpg's. I feel like that would be the most cost effective solution for them.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #513  
concealer404's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,206
Default

Looks like the BRZ/FRS motor is made out of 100% Japanese WTF metal.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #514  
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
Do not want.
Originally Posted by elesjuan
But the thing is, it looks like a pile of dog ---- and the performance numbers on it are far from impressive. I'd rather spend less on a car which could be improved and still come out ahead..
Originally Posted by elesjuan
Yet you'll never overcome the fact that it looks like complete and total dog **** and the roof doesn't come off....

Still, do not want.
We appreciate you keeping us updated on your continued lack of interest in ever buying this car.

My recommendation to you is to not buy it.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 02:26 PM
  #515  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
We appreciate you keeping us updated on your continued lack of interest in ever buying this car.

My recommendation to you is to not buy it.
Naw i think he should buy it and keep us updated on how much he hates his car.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 02:36 PM
  #516  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G
Those stats are also highly unlikely because Mazda is not a huge automaker and does not have loads of cash or the ability to amortize their costs over ginormous production runs. Realistically I think they can pull off a sub 2300lb miata with roughly 170hp and maybe 180hp if they push it. Do not expect >200hp because that is just not going to happen as it would be cost prohibitive.

Which is why they are partnered with Alpha on the chassis.

I am not sure how the 2.0L skyactiv handles boost. But a 1.4 turbo wouldn't be terrible; as long as it could still spool up an EFR6258 I would be happy.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 03:25 PM
  #517  
elesjuan's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,360
Total Cats: 43
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
so you want a c70?
No. S60 or S80, maybe.

Originally Posted by 18psi
Often times I think I'm the most negative, pessimistic ******* I know.

Then I look at you and suddenly I'm a "glass half full" person

Seriously man........Give other cars a chance.
lol
Aww thanks.

Sorry, I just don't understand the ******* swingers..

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
We appreciate you keeping us updated on your continued lack of interest in ever buying this car.

My recommendation to you is to not buy it.

Still do not want.


Just think, at average cost of an NA miata you could buy almost 12 of them for the same price! Or a properly setup LSx miata...
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 03:30 PM
  #518  
miata2fast's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,145
Total Cats: 175
From: Dover, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Ryan_G

I just hope Mazda doesn't try to put a 1.3 turbo engine in the miata like some rumors state. I would rather them put in the 2.0l skyactive engine they already have developed and tune it a little more for performance and less for mpg's. I feel like that would be the most cost effective solution for them.
I could not agree more. The bottom line is the bigger the motor the more potential.

The best scenerio we could ask for would be for a larger discplacement motor that has plenty of options to go even bigger (like the current NC motor). Also have a cylinder head that has the right valve angle and runner geometry, but also has plenty more volume potential. I would prefer it to start out with a small camshaft too.

There is something fun about the ability to uncork a motor and get large gains from a build up. A motor that is already hopped up near the ceiling of its potential is no fun. Never mind the much higher expense to see the same gains.
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 04:55 PM
  #519  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by elesjuan
No. S60 or S80, maybe.


.
No. S366 or bust
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 05:12 PM
  #520  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
No. S366 or bust
lol.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.