Notices
Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Half Bottle of JD and a 12mm wrench

Old Mar 21, 2011 | 03:19 PM
  #161  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 80,552
Total Cats: 4,368
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

**** the color, do that motor.
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 03:20 PM
  #162  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

twin turbo VQ?
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 03:29 PM
  #163  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
Being done my friend.

The valve cover needs to be modded after machining being that the center section between cyl 1 and 2 need to be filled with new metal due to the milling.

Do you think -10 or -12 would be best on the valve cover?

Also port out the hole that connects the center baffle to the driver's side baffle and weld the pcv shut.

I have a -12 male bung but just keep in mind that the fittings are pretty big. You can see pics in my build thread. Note that from what I found there are also no off-the-shelf catch cans with -12 bungs. Only up to -10. That said you can custom order a can with any bungs and breather vents you want for cheaper than ebay from petersonfluidsys.com

Personally I think bigger is better. Again though, -12 hose does not have the same bend radius as smaller hose and it takes up more space.
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 03:38 PM
  #164  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

Fae, im not worried, I do my own fabrication and -12 catch can is only 15 minutes away.

I will just bore the 3/4" npt fittings out of my current can and weld on a -12an fitting to the atpturbo vband catchcan that i currently have.


In regards to the size, the elbow fittings post a fairly large restriction on the size of the through-way. I think the theory behind it is HVLP.. high volume low pressure.. to allow you to not suck oil through the holes. Factory turbo engines for example a 1jz uses 1" hose (or similar) factory (-16AN)
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 05:40 PM
  #165  
dgmorr's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,446
Total Cats: 6
From: Toronto, ON
Default

Audi 2.7tt...modded to some extent.
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #166  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by shlammed
Fae, im not worried, I do my own fabrication and -12 catch can is only 15 minutes away.

I will just bore the 3/4" npt fittings out of my current can and weld on a -12an fitting to the atpturbo vband catchcan that i currently have.


In regards to the size, the elbow fittings post a fairly large restriction on the size of the through-way. I think the theory behind it is HVLP.. high volume low pressure.. to allow you to not suck oil through the holes. Factory turbo engines for example a 1jz uses 1" hose (or similar) factory (-16AN)
Yah I think that the HVLP has worked for me- I don't see clouds of smoke under WOT behind me at all and I am running a slashcut (vent to exhaust)
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #167  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

ordered pipe to make intercooler charge piping.

2.5" hot, 3" cold. all aluminum.

Also ordered the 1/8 NPT bung for IAT sensor. Debating running it on the Intercooler or adjacent to the intercooler on the cold pipe.
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #168  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

What IAT sensor does AEM use?
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 07:58 PM
  #169  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

Any sensor.

It has calibration for most sensors but if you know the curve for your sensor you plug in the voltage or resistance wtv it is for it's relative temperature.
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 10:43 AM
  #170  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

Ordered velocity stacks and runner material. Need to get the intake manifold flange ordered and i need to get some material for the plenum.

Im going to be using the stock 2002 throttle body still.

runners are going to be ~7-8" long and the plenum volume i need to calculate... i think the rule is 1.5x the engine capacity on a boosted engine? aka 2.7 liters. So it I make it 2.5 liters i will maintain some throttle response as the 150% is on the high side of the limits.
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 10:56 PM
  #171  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

Subscribed.

Awesome build so far. Can't wait to see the IM. Are you using a Ross extrusion or will you be making the plenum from scratch?
Old Mar 22, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #172  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

Plenum is from scratch.

This is a design I am working off of.
Name:  902d82d1.jpg
Views: 143
Size:  16.4 KB

The runner and velocity stacks are Ross parts. Their oval sized type works best with the miata port having overlaid the runner onto the port in cad.

I'm just not sure where to get the quarter dome from locally, so it might be pie cut pipe
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 12:28 AM
  #173  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

Looks good. Pie cuts are a pain, especially on aluminum. I'd just order a cap or hemisphere from these guys:

https://www.shopwagner.com/nxc/nxcli.nsf

They're cheap.
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 12:52 AM
  #174  
Gotpsi?'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,260
Total Cats: 5
From: Central, TX / Bay area, CA
Default

Also use a bend in the center, hard edges = bad. Also what size tubing are you using and what plenum volume are you shooting for?
Old Mar 23, 2011 | 09:25 AM
  #175  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

tubing for the plenum? to be determined by the shape of the plenum to optimize at 2.5 Liters.

should be using something like 3.25" id 0.080 wall pipe cut lengthwise for the top. I was planning on using a flat floor with the Ross velocity stacks flush in there. see the plenum design above.

The inside of the manifold would look something like this if i have my way...
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #176  
thasac's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 811
Total Cats: 44
From: Mass.
Default

CNC'd aluminum is so sexy

sub'd for goodness.

-Zach
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 04:31 PM
  #177  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

.080" is too thin for an intake. Use .125" at least. As for the velocity stacks, they flow better raised off the floor. I'd try that if you can. I'm not sure if the Ross stacks allow for that. I'm using horns from velocity of sound for mine.

Last thing, this design seems easier to build and is very similar to the one you linked:

Old Mar 24, 2011 | 04:56 PM
  #178  
shlammed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

That design does look easier.
Thanks ARTech.


The large radius bend in 0.125" may be hard to source... but it makes sense.

For the time being, im not overly worried about the stacks raising off the floor because of the shape the ross ones are it would take quite a bit of work to raise them properly.


Once i build mine, I am going to blueprint what I made and offer these as a complete bolt on intake for BP miatas. (with modification needed to cold pipe)

-Matt
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #179  
dgmorr's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,446
Total Cats: 6
From: Toronto, ON
Default

Sign me up on that list...pending price.
Old Mar 24, 2011 | 07:06 PM
  #180  
Gotpsi?'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,260
Total Cats: 5
From: Central, TX / Bay area, CA
Default

[QUOTE=ARTech;705836].080" is too thin for an intake. Use .125" at least. As for the velocity stacks, they flow better raised off the floor. I'd try that if you can. I'm not sure if the Ross stacks allow for that. I'm using horns from velocity of sound for mine.

The ross ones have sharp ridges that have to be rounded down to use when raised I used them once and have move to another source for that reason.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.